{"title":"Perception and production mismatch in truncated past tense verbs in\n Korean","authors":"Drew Crosby, Amanda Dalola","doi":"10.1075/kl.22001.cro","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Korean is often described as neutralizing its obstruents to\n unreleased stops in coda position. However, a stylistic truncated form of the\n intimate past tense expressing avuncularity, contradicts this description by\n realizing a fricative word finally. Despite tokens elicited from informants\n lacking phonetic evidence for a word-final vowel, speakers report hearing [ɨ]\n word-finally in these truncated forms. The present article gives an optimality\n theoretic (OT) account (McCarthy & Prince 1995) of this phenomenon by\n utilizing Benua’s (1995)\n base-truncated form (BT) constraints to explain the production of the form and\n Boersma & Hamann’s (2008) cue constraints to explain the mismatch between\n the production and perception in parallel to the treatment of loanwords. This\n suggests that output-output constraints and perceptual cue constraints may\n interact to create differences in phonological form between production and\n perception, even within native phonologies, and lends further support for the\n need for separate production and perception phonologies (Boersma 1999).","PeriodicalId":29725,"journal":{"name":"Korean Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/kl.22001.cro","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Korean is often described as neutralizing its obstruents to
unreleased stops in coda position. However, a stylistic truncated form of the
intimate past tense expressing avuncularity, contradicts this description by
realizing a fricative word finally. Despite tokens elicited from informants
lacking phonetic evidence for a word-final vowel, speakers report hearing [ɨ]
word-finally in these truncated forms. The present article gives an optimality
theoretic (OT) account (McCarthy & Prince 1995) of this phenomenon by
utilizing Benua’s (1995)
base-truncated form (BT) constraints to explain the production of the form and
Boersma & Hamann’s (2008) cue constraints to explain the mismatch between
the production and perception in parallel to the treatment of loanwords. This
suggests that output-output constraints and perceptual cue constraints may
interact to create differences in phonological form between production and
perception, even within native phonologies, and lends further support for the
need for separate production and perception phonologies (Boersma 1999).