Comparing Teacher and Student Report of Behavioral Risk in Predicting Elementary Student Math Outcomes

IF 1.2 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION Pub Date : 2019-12-12 DOI:10.1177/1534508419885016
Nathaniel P. von der Embse, Andrew Jenkins, Geoffrey West, Katie Eklund, Stephen P. Kilgus, Myesha M. Morgan
{"title":"Comparing Teacher and Student Report of Behavioral Risk in Predicting Elementary Student Math Outcomes","authors":"Nathaniel P. von der Embse, Andrew Jenkins, Geoffrey West, Katie Eklund, Stephen P. Kilgus, Myesha M. Morgan","doi":"10.1177/1534508419885016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Universal screening is a promising and proactive method to detect emotional and behavioral risk in schools. To date, most of the research on screening has evaluated teacher report formats. Despite the potential benefits, there has been a general lack of research on student self-report particularly in elementary grade levels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative predictive ability of teacher and student report of risk on later academic outcomes. Results indicated that student self-report of risk significantly contributed to the prediction of academic outcomes even when controlling for demographic variables and in comparison to teacher report. The strength of this relationship increased from first to fifth grade. Implications and future research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46264,"journal":{"name":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","volume":"46 1","pages":"304 - 309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1534508419885016","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508419885016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Universal screening is a promising and proactive method to detect emotional and behavioral risk in schools. To date, most of the research on screening has evaluated teacher report formats. Despite the potential benefits, there has been a general lack of research on student self-report particularly in elementary grade levels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative predictive ability of teacher and student report of risk on later academic outcomes. Results indicated that student self-report of risk significantly contributed to the prediction of academic outcomes even when controlling for demographic variables and in comparison to teacher report. The strength of this relationship increased from first to fifth grade. Implications and future research are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
师生行为风险报告预测小学生数学成绩之比较
普遍筛查是一种很有前途和前瞻性的方法来检测学校的情绪和行为风险。迄今为止,大多数关于筛选的研究都是评估教师报告的格式。尽管有潜在的好处,但普遍缺乏对学生自我报告的研究,特别是在小学阶段。本研究的目的是评估教师和学生报告风险对以后学业成绩的相对预测能力。结果表明,即使在控制人口统计学变量和与教师报告相比较的情况下,学生的风险自我报告对学业成绩的预测也有显著的贡献。从一年级到五年级,这种关系的强度有所增加。讨论了研究的意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION
ASSESSMENT FOR EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Reliability of Ratings of an English Language Arts Curriculum With the Curriculum Evaluation Guidelines What Is Important to Measure in Sentence-Level Language Comprehension? Universal Screening for Student Mental Health: Selection of Norming Group Validation of the Youth Internalizing Problem Screener in Singapore Using Empirical Information to Prioritize Early Literacy Assessment and Instruction in Preschool and Kindergarten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1