Few-shot learning for biotic stress classification of coffee leaves

IF 8.2 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aiia.2022.04.001
Lucas M. Tassis , Renato A. Krohling
{"title":"Few-shot learning for biotic stress classification of coffee leaves","authors":"Lucas M. Tassis ,&nbsp;Renato A. Krohling","doi":"10.1016/j.aiia.2022.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the last few years, deep neural networks have achieved promising results in several fields. However, one of the main limitations of these methods is the need for large-scale datasets to properly generalize. Few-shot learning methods emerged as an attempt to solve this shortcoming. Among the few-shot learning methods, there is a class of methods known as embedding learning or metric learning. These methods tackle the classification problem by learning to compare, needing fewer training data. One of the main problems in plant diseases and pests recognition is the lack of large public datasets available. Due to this difficulty, the field emerges as an intriguing application to evaluate the few-shot learning methods. The field is also relevant due to the social and economic importance of agriculture in several countries. In this work, datasets consisting of biotic stresses in coffee leaves are used as a case study to evaluate the performance of few-shot learning in classification and severity estimation tasks. We achieved competitive results compared with the ones reported in the literature in the classification task, with accuracy values close to 96%. Furthermore, we achieved superior results in the severity estimation task, obtaining 6.74% greater accuracy than the baseline.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52814,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589721722000046/pdfft?md5=5cf0c42bce2c0c6dd16ddbaf36a982d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2589721722000046-main.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589721722000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the last few years, deep neural networks have achieved promising results in several fields. However, one of the main limitations of these methods is the need for large-scale datasets to properly generalize. Few-shot learning methods emerged as an attempt to solve this shortcoming. Among the few-shot learning methods, there is a class of methods known as embedding learning or metric learning. These methods tackle the classification problem by learning to compare, needing fewer training data. One of the main problems in plant diseases and pests recognition is the lack of large public datasets available. Due to this difficulty, the field emerges as an intriguing application to evaluate the few-shot learning methods. The field is also relevant due to the social and economic importance of agriculture in several countries. In this work, datasets consisting of biotic stresses in coffee leaves are used as a case study to evaluate the performance of few-shot learning in classification and severity estimation tasks. We achieved competitive results compared with the ones reported in the literature in the classification task, with accuracy values close to 96%. Furthermore, we achieved superior results in the severity estimation task, obtaining 6.74% greater accuracy than the baseline.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咖啡叶生物胁迫分类的少射学习
在过去的几年里,深度神经网络在几个领域取得了可喜的成果。然而,这些方法的主要限制之一是需要大规模的数据集来进行适当的泛化。为了解决这一缺陷,出现了一种尝试。在少量的学习方法中,有一类方法被称为嵌入学习或度量学习。这些方法通过学习比较来解决分类问题,需要更少的训练数据。植物病虫害识别的主要问题之一是缺乏大型公共数据集。由于这一困难,该领域出现了一个有趣的应用来评估少镜头学习方法。由于农业在一些国家的社会和经济重要性,该领域也具有相关性。在这项工作中,由咖啡叶中的生物胁迫组成的数据集被用作案例研究,以评估在分类和严重性估计任务中的少射学习的性能。在分类任务中,我们取得了与文献报道相比具有竞争力的结果,准确率接近96%。此外,我们在严重性估计任务中取得了更好的结果,获得了比基线高6.74%的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prediction of spatial heterogeneity in nutrient-limited sub-tropical maize yield: Implications for precision management in the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains UAV-based field watermelon detection and counting using YOLOv8s with image panorama stitching and overlap partitioning Comparing YOLOv8 and Mask R-CNN for instance segmentation in complex orchard environments A comprehensive survey on weed and crop classification using machine learning and deep learning Computer vision in smart agriculture and precision farming: Techniques and applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1