'Ne Bis In Idem' Principle in Criminal Proceedings – Comparative Analysis with International Instruments and Kosovo Legislation

Orhan Çeku
{"title":"'Ne Bis In Idem' Principle in Criminal Proceedings – Comparative Analysis with International Instruments and Kosovo Legislation","authors":"Orhan Çeku","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-6.3-a000308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Criminal procedure law consists of legal principles, such as a fair and impartial trial and within a reasonable time, presumption of innocence, the principle \"in dubio pro reo,\" independence of the court, equality of parties, the principle \"ne bis in idem\"etc. Among the main principles recognised by International Conventions, the Constitutions of States, and Criminal Procedure Laws is the principle, “The right not to be tried twice for the same offence,\" or as it is also known, \"ne bis in idem.\" The principle “in bis in idem” is used in Kosovo’s criminal proceedings, and recognition of this principle by international convention, including its recognition by the Law of the European Union, is analysed in this paper. \nThe legislation of Kosovo was established with the influence and assistance of the international community, which had an administration mandate until 17 February 2008, the date on which Kosovo declared its independence and, hence, separated from the former Yugoslavia. The new state is not a member of the UN but is officially recognised by more than 100 countries. In 2010, the International Court of Justice issued the Advisory Opinion which concluded, “The declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo on 17 February 2008 had not violated general international law.”\nThe purpose of this paper is to emphasise the importance of this principle when dealing with criminal cases before regular courts, the legal security that this principle provides to society, and the implementation of international legal instruments in the national law.\nMethods: The paper uses methods of analysis and synthesis, the descriptive method, as well as the method of doctrinal interpretation of legal norms of criminal proceedings.\nResults and conclusions: This principle has been accepted by international instruments and by Kosovo’s constitutional and legal system. The application of this principle in the criminal justice system in Kosovo forms legal certainty for citizens and constitutes protection of the rights and legitimate interests of persons involved in criminal proceedings. Kosovo has applied international standards in the implementation of criminal legislation and has directly incorporated international human rights instruments into its constitutional system (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights adopted by the UN in 1966, ensued by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms).","PeriodicalId":40329,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6.3-a000308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Criminal procedure law consists of legal principles, such as a fair and impartial trial and within a reasonable time, presumption of innocence, the principle "in dubio pro reo," independence of the court, equality of parties, the principle "ne bis in idem"etc. Among the main principles recognised by International Conventions, the Constitutions of States, and Criminal Procedure Laws is the principle, “The right not to be tried twice for the same offence," or as it is also known, "ne bis in idem." The principle “in bis in idem” is used in Kosovo’s criminal proceedings, and recognition of this principle by international convention, including its recognition by the Law of the European Union, is analysed in this paper. The legislation of Kosovo was established with the influence and assistance of the international community, which had an administration mandate until 17 February 2008, the date on which Kosovo declared its independence and, hence, separated from the former Yugoslavia. The new state is not a member of the UN but is officially recognised by more than 100 countries. In 2010, the International Court of Justice issued the Advisory Opinion which concluded, “The declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo on 17 February 2008 had not violated general international law.” The purpose of this paper is to emphasise the importance of this principle when dealing with criminal cases before regular courts, the legal security that this principle provides to society, and the implementation of international legal instruments in the national law. Methods: The paper uses methods of analysis and synthesis, the descriptive method, as well as the method of doctrinal interpretation of legal norms of criminal proceedings. Results and conclusions: This principle has been accepted by international instruments and by Kosovo’s constitutional and legal system. The application of this principle in the criminal justice system in Kosovo forms legal certainty for citizens and constitutes protection of the rights and legitimate interests of persons involved in criminal proceedings. Kosovo has applied international standards in the implementation of criminal legislation and has directly incorporated international human rights instruments into its constitutional system (International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights adopted by the UN in 1966, ensued by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刑事诉讼中的“平等原则”——与国际文书和科索沃立法的比较分析
刑事诉讼法由法律原则组成,如在合理时间内进行公平公正的审判、无罪推定、“无罪推定”原则、法院独立性、各方平等、“一罪不二”原则等。在国际公约、国家宪法和刑事诉讼法承认的主要原则中,“不因同一罪行接受两次审判的权利”,或者也被称为“一罪不二审”在科索沃的刑事诉讼中使用,本文分析了国际公约对这一原则的承认,包括欧洲联盟法律对其的承认。科索沃立法是在国际社会的影响和协助下制定的,国际社会的行政任务一直到2008年2月17日,也就是科索沃宣布独立并因此脱离前南斯拉夫的日期。这个新国家不是联合国成员,但得到了100多个国家的正式承认。2010年,国际法院发表了咨询意见,结论是:“2008年2月17日科索沃宣布独立没有违反一般国际法。”,这一原则为社会提供的法律保障,以及国际法律文书在国内法中的实施。方法:运用分析综合法、描述性分析法和理论解释法对刑事诉讼法律规范进行研究。结果和结论:这一原则已被国际文书以及科索沃的宪法和法律制度所接受。这一原则在科索沃刑事司法系统中的适用为公民提供了法律确定性,构成了对刑事诉讼当事人权利和合法利益的保护。科索沃在执行刑事立法方面采用了国际标准,并将国际人权文书直接纳入其宪法体系(1966年联合国通过了《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》,随后又通过了《欧洲保护人权和基本自由公约》)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges of Legal Guarantees for the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in International Commercial Cases Advancing Sustainable Justice through AI-Based Case Law Analysis The Implementation of Consensual Tenet in Modern Civil Procedure: Comparative Analysis of Court-Connected Settlement Procedures Applied in Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine Human Trafficking in Western Balkan: Case Study of Kosovo Towards an Effective Legal Protection for Older Persons in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of International Human Rights Law and Arab Constitutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1