Nahu-kparilim (cattle caretakership): understanding the persistence of unfree Fulani labour and the (non)violent renegotiation of power relations in agrarian economies in northern Ghana

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Review of African Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/03056244.2023.2192344
Surulola Eke
{"title":"Nahu-kparilim (cattle caretakership): understanding the persistence of unfree Fulani labour and the (non)violent renegotiation of power relations in agrarian economies in northern Ghana","authors":"Surulola Eke","doi":"10.1080/03056244.2023.2192344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article focuses on how Fulani outsider status, often maintained through several generations, constitutes the basis for unequal labour, land and associated relations. It discusses how static forms of ‘fixed’ citizenship and socioeconomic immobility both maintain and intensify labour precarity, rendering the Fulani more vulnerable to the whims, caprices and avarice of their native ‘overlords’, as evidenced by the practice of nahu-kparilim in Ghana. The article’s main interest is thus land and labour injustice rather than pastoral production and related livelihood activities. Integrating the theories of unfreedom, social reproduction and subalternity, the article contributes to unfree labour studies by demonstrating that despite being constrained in complex ways, unfree labourers have the agency to renegotiate power relations. This advances the idea of unfree labourers’ agency which, in comparison to their immiseration, receives less attention in scholarship on unfreedom.","PeriodicalId":47526,"journal":{"name":"Review of African Political Economy","volume":"50 1","pages":"49 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of African Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2023.2192344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article focuses on how Fulani outsider status, often maintained through several generations, constitutes the basis for unequal labour, land and associated relations. It discusses how static forms of ‘fixed’ citizenship and socioeconomic immobility both maintain and intensify labour precarity, rendering the Fulani more vulnerable to the whims, caprices and avarice of their native ‘overlords’, as evidenced by the practice of nahu-kparilim in Ghana. The article’s main interest is thus land and labour injustice rather than pastoral production and related livelihood activities. Integrating the theories of unfreedom, social reproduction and subalternity, the article contributes to unfree labour studies by demonstrating that despite being constrained in complex ways, unfree labourers have the agency to renegotiate power relations. This advances the idea of unfree labourers’ agency which, in comparison to their immiseration, receives less attention in scholarship on unfreedom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nahu-kparilim(养牛):了解加纳北部农业经济中不自由的富拉尼劳工的持续存在和权力关系的(非暴力)重新谈判
摘要本文关注的是富拉尼人的局外人地位,通常维持了几代人,是如何构成不平等劳动、土地和相关关系的基础的。它讨论了静态形式的“固定”公民身份和社会经济不动性如何维持和加剧劳动力的不稳定,使富拉尼人更容易受到当地“统治者”的反复无常和贪婪的影响,加纳的纳胡·克帕里姆实践就是明证。因此,这篇文章的主要关注点是土地和劳动力的不公正,而不是畜牧生产和相关的生计活动。本文综合了非自由主义、社会再生产和次替代主义的理论,通过证明非自由劳工尽管受到复杂的约束,但有重新谈判权力关系的代理权,为非自由劳工研究做出了贡献。这推进了自由劳动者代理的理念,与他们的移民相比,自由劳动者代理在学术界较少受到关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Review of African Political Economy (ROAPE) is a refereed journal committed to encouraging high quality research and fostering excellence in the understanding of African political economy. Published quarterly by Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group for the ROAPE international collective it has since 1974 provided radical analysis of trends and issues in Africa. It has paid particular attention to the political economy of inequality, exploitation and oppression, whether driven by global forces or local ones (such as class, race, community and gender), and to materialist interpretations of change in Africa. It has sustained a critical analysis of the nature of power and the state in Africa.
期刊最新文献
Resource nationalism and energy transitions in lower-income countries: the case of Tanzania Speaking out, talking back? African feminist politics and decolonial poetics of knowing, organising and loving South Africa’s unjust climate reparations: a critique of the Just Energy Transition Partnership How capitalism is destroying the Horn of Africa: sheep and the crises in Somalia and Sudan (Un)Just transition in power generation: neoliberal reforms and climate crisis in Sudan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1