Effect of a summer school on formative and summative assessment in accounting education

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100769
Evelien Opdecam, Patricia Everaert
{"title":"Effect of a summer school on formative and summative assessment in accounting education","authors":"Evelien Opdecam,&nbsp;Patricia Everaert","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the effect of a voluntary accounting summer school on formative and summative assessments in accounting education. A quasi-experiment with a questionnaire design was conducted in a first-year undergraduate accounting course. The sample consisted of 497 first-time higher education students. The effectiveness of voluntary summer school for performance was examined by comparing the attendees’ and non-attendees’ scores on two formative assessments and one summative assessment to determine whether attendees scored higher. The results of multiple one-way analyses of covariance, controlling for different variables, reveal that attendance at summer school has a significantly positive effect on short-term performance (first formative assessment), but it disappears over time. No significant differences are found for the second formative assessment or the summative assessment. Stepwise linear regression analyses show that the scores of the test the students completed at the end of summer school are significantly positively related to the summative assessment score (final exam at the end of the semester). Implications and recommendations for further research and the organization of summer schools are covered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575122000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of a voluntary accounting summer school on formative and summative assessments in accounting education. A quasi-experiment with a questionnaire design was conducted in a first-year undergraduate accounting course. The sample consisted of 497 first-time higher education students. The effectiveness of voluntary summer school for performance was examined by comparing the attendees’ and non-attendees’ scores on two formative assessments and one summative assessment to determine whether attendees scored higher. The results of multiple one-way analyses of covariance, controlling for different variables, reveal that attendance at summer school has a significantly positive effect on short-term performance (first formative assessment), but it disappears over time. No significant differences are found for the second formative assessment or the summative assessment. Stepwise linear regression analyses show that the scores of the test the students completed at the end of summer school are significantly positively related to the summative assessment score (final exam at the end of the semester). Implications and recommendations for further research and the organization of summer schools are covered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
暑期学校对会计教育形成性评价与总结性评价的影响
本文探讨了自愿会计暑期学校对会计教育形成性评估和总结性评估的影响。本研究以问卷设计的准实验方式,对一年级的会计学课程进行研究。样本包括497名首次接受高等教育的学生。通过比较参与者和非参与者在两次形成性评估和一次总结性评估中的得分,以确定参与者的得分是否更高,来检验自愿暑期学校的绩效有效性。控制不同变量的多重单向协方差分析结果显示,参加暑期学校对短期绩效(第一次形成性评估)有显著的积极影响,但随着时间的推移而消失。在第二次形成性评估和总结性评估中没有发现显著差异。逐步线性回归分析表明,学生在暑期学校结束时完成的测试分数与总结性评估分数(学期结束时的期末考试)呈显著正相关。对进一步研究和组织暑期学校的影响和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1