Use of Cervical Cancer Screening among Patients of Primary Healthcare Services: Northeast Portugal.

Q3 Medicine Portuguese Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2022-04-22 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000522666
Cristina Teixeira, Celeste Antão, Eugénia Anes, Maria José Gomes, Ana Versos, Conceição Tomé
{"title":"Use of Cervical Cancer Screening among Patients of Primary Healthcare Services: Northeast Portugal.","authors":"Cristina Teixeira, Celeste Antão, Eugénia Anes, Maria José Gomes, Ana Versos, Conceição Tomé","doi":"10.1159/000522666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the overuse and underuse of cervical cancer (CC) screening plays a role in preventing such behaviours, allowing to maximize the CC screening uptake.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the predictors of being over-screened and never/under-screened in CC screening in Northeast Portugal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a part of a larger cross-sectional survey carried out in two public health centres in Northeast Portugal (October 2017 to June 2018). Data collection was based on a face-to-face interview. This analysis included 764 women (aged 25-60 years) classified according to the use of CC screening into guideline-consistent screened, over-screened and unscreened/under-screened. Multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to assess predictors of being over-screened and never/under-screened. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and respective 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-fourth (<i>n</i> = 197) of participants were unscreened/under-screened and 50.0% (<i>n</i> = 382) of them were classified as over-screened. Regular visits with primary care physicians (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.76) and higher age (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.00) reduced the odds of being unscreened/under-screened. Women who received prescription/recommendation for CC screening from primary care physician (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.09-3.29) or both primary care physician and nurse (OR = 2.62; 95% CI: 1.10-6.22) were more likely to be over-screened. Higher level of CC health literacy decreases the odds of being over-screened (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90-1.00) and unscreened/under-screened (OR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.92). The majority of over-screened (52.2%) and of under-screened (44.2%) women reported that their screening frequency was based on healthcare provider prescription. Among never-screened women, 60.2% reported that no one prescribed screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increase in CC health literacy can maximize CC screening uptake. Primary healthcare providers could play a role in preventing the overuse and underuse of CC screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":37244,"journal":{"name":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","volume":"40 1","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Portuguese Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the overuse and underuse of cervical cancer (CC) screening plays a role in preventing such behaviours, allowing to maximize the CC screening uptake.

Aim: To assess the predictors of being over-screened and never/under-screened in CC screening in Northeast Portugal.

Methods: This is a part of a larger cross-sectional survey carried out in two public health centres in Northeast Portugal (October 2017 to June 2018). Data collection was based on a face-to-face interview. This analysis included 764 women (aged 25-60 years) classified according to the use of CC screening into guideline-consistent screened, over-screened and unscreened/under-screened. Multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to assess predictors of being over-screened and never/under-screened. Adjusted odds ratio (OR) and respective 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were obtained.

Results: One-fourth (n = 197) of participants were unscreened/under-screened and 50.0% (n = 382) of them were classified as over-screened. Regular visits with primary care physicians (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.26-0.76) and higher age (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-1.00) reduced the odds of being unscreened/under-screened. Women who received prescription/recommendation for CC screening from primary care physician (OR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.09-3.29) or both primary care physician and nurse (OR = 2.62; 95% CI: 1.10-6.22) were more likely to be over-screened. Higher level of CC health literacy decreases the odds of being over-screened (OR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90-1.00) and unscreened/under-screened (OR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.92). The majority of over-screened (52.2%) and of under-screened (44.2%) women reported that their screening frequency was based on healthcare provider prescription. Among never-screened women, 60.2% reported that no one prescribed screening.

Conclusion: The increase in CC health literacy can maximize CC screening uptake. Primary healthcare providers could play a role in preventing the overuse and underuse of CC screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级保健服务患者中使用宫颈癌筛查:葡萄牙东北部
背景:了解宫颈癌筛查的过度使用和不充分使用在预防此类行为中起着重要作用,可以最大限度地提高宫颈癌筛查的使用率。目的:评估葡萄牙东北部CC筛查中过度筛查和未筛查/未筛查的预测因素。方法:这是在葡萄牙东北部的两个公共卫生中心(2017年10月至2018年6月)进行的一项更大的横断面调查的一部分。数据收集是基于面对面的访谈。该分析包括764名女性(25-60岁),根据CC筛查的使用情况分为符合指南的筛查、过度筛查和未筛查/筛查不足。采用多变量逻辑回归模型来评估过度筛查和未筛查/未筛查的预测因素。获得校正优势比(OR)和相应的95%置信区间(95% CI)。结果:四分之一(n = 197)的参与者未筛查/筛查不足,50.0% (n = 382)的参与者被归类为过度筛查。定期访问初级保健医生(OR = 0.44;95% CI: 0.26-0.76)和更高的年龄(OR = 0.98;95% CI: 0.96-1.00)降低了未筛查/筛查不足的几率。接受初级保健医生处方/建议进行CC筛查的妇女(OR = 1.89;95% CI: 1.09-3.29)或初级保健医生和护士(or = 2.62;95% CI: 1.10-6.22)更有可能被过度筛查。CC健康素养水平越高,被过度筛查的几率越低(OR = 0.95;95% CI: 0.90-1.00)和未筛查/未筛查(OR = 0.87;95% ci: 0.82-0.92)。大多数过度筛查(52.2%)和筛查不足(44.2%)的妇女报告说,她们的筛查频率是基于医疗保健提供者的处方。在从未接受过筛查的女性中,60.2%的人报告说没有人规定进行筛查。结论:提高CC健康素养可以最大限度地提高CC筛查率。初级卫生保健提供者可在预防CC筛查的过度使用和使用不足方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Portuguese Journal of Public Health
Portuguese Journal of Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
55 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mental Health as a Polysemic Construct? Revisiting the Debate about University Students' Unmet Needs. The Potential of Physical Activity for the Control of Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Cancer: An Often-Overlooked Ally for Public Health and Healthcare Management. Supported Accommodations for People with Serious Mental Disorders: Staff’s Assessment of Work Challenges and Their Impact during COVID-19 Epidemic Intelligence Threat Reporting Profile in Portugal during the COVID-19: 2 Years of Decrease in Reporting on Non-COVID-19 Threats From Health Communication to Health Literacy: A Comprehensive Analysis of Relevance and Strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1