Path analysis of influence of coping style and self-consistency on stigma among bipolar disorder depression patients

Juyi Peng, Ya-Ling Hu, Xiaofen Fan, Tian-e Zhang, Yan Ren, Ya-Chi Fan, Hong Yang
{"title":"Path analysis of influence of coping style and self-consistency on stigma among bipolar disorder depression patients","authors":"Juyi Peng, Ya-Ling Hu, Xiaofen Fan, Tian-e Zhang, Yan Ren, Ya-Chi Fan, Hong Yang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115682-20190712-02494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the correlations among coping style, self-consistency and stigma in bipolar disorder depression patients. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom June 2017 to December 2018, this study selected 217 bipolar disorder depression inpatients of Department of Mental Health at a Class Ⅲ Grade A hospital in Taiyuan by convenience sampling. All of them were investigated with the general information questionnaire, Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination Scale (PDD) , Self-Consistency and Congruence Scale (SCCS) and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) . Amos 22.0 was used to path analysis. \n \n \nResults \nThe scores of PDD, SCSQ and positive coping style and negative coping style were (30.92±6.41) , (101.54±16.99) , (21.63±6.46) and (13.36±5.03) respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that positive coping style of patients had negative correlations with the self-consistency and stigma (r=-0.748, -0.655; P<0.01) ; negative coping style had positive correlations with the self-consistency and stigma (r=0.553, 0.742; P<0.01) ; self-consistency had a positive correlation with the stigma (r=0.763, P<0.01) . Mediating effect test showed that self-consistency only had partial mediating role between the negative coping style and stigma and the mediating effect accounted for 40.54% of the total effect. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe negative coping style not only has a direct impact on the stigma in bipolar disorder depression patients, but also has an indirect impact on stigma by self-consistency. Medical staff can carry out intervention based on this path to reduce the stigma of bipolar disorder depression patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nDepression; Bipolar disorder; Stigma; Self-consistency; Coping style; Path analysis","PeriodicalId":10070,"journal":{"name":"中华现代护理杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"1306-1310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华现代护理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115682-20190712-02494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the correlations among coping style, self-consistency and stigma in bipolar disorder depression patients. Methods From June 2017 to December 2018, this study selected 217 bipolar disorder depression inpatients of Department of Mental Health at a Class Ⅲ Grade A hospital in Taiyuan by convenience sampling. All of them were investigated with the general information questionnaire, Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination Scale (PDD) , Self-Consistency and Congruence Scale (SCCS) and the Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) . Amos 22.0 was used to path analysis. Results The scores of PDD, SCSQ and positive coping style and negative coping style were (30.92±6.41) , (101.54±16.99) , (21.63±6.46) and (13.36±5.03) respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that positive coping style of patients had negative correlations with the self-consistency and stigma (r=-0.748, -0.655; P<0.01) ; negative coping style had positive correlations with the self-consistency and stigma (r=0.553, 0.742; P<0.01) ; self-consistency had a positive correlation with the stigma (r=0.763, P<0.01) . Mediating effect test showed that self-consistency only had partial mediating role between the negative coping style and stigma and the mediating effect accounted for 40.54% of the total effect. Conclusions The negative coping style not only has a direct impact on the stigma in bipolar disorder depression patients, but also has an indirect impact on stigma by self-consistency. Medical staff can carry out intervention based on this path to reduce the stigma of bipolar disorder depression patients. Key words: Depression; Bipolar disorder; Stigma; Self-consistency; Coping style; Path analysis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双相情感障碍抑郁症患者应对方式和自我一致性对病耻感影响的通径分析
目的探讨双相情感障碍抑郁患者的应对方式、自我一致性和耻辱感之间的相关性。方法2017年6月至2018年12月,采用方便抽样的方法,选取太原市某三甲医院精神卫生科217例双相情感障碍抑郁症住院患者。采用一般信息量表、知觉贬值判别量表(PDD)、自洽量表(SCCS)和简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)对其进行调查。阿莫斯22.0用于通径分析。结果PDD、SCSQ、积极应对方式和消极应对方式得分分别为(30.92±6.41)、(101.54±16.99)、(21.63±6.46)和(13.36±5.03)。Pearson相关分析显示,积极应对方式和患者的自我一致性和耻辱感呈负相关(r=-0.748,-0.655;P<0.01);消极应对方式和自我一致性和耻辱感呈正相关(r=0.553,0.742;P<0.01);自我一致性与污名呈正相关(r=0.763,P<0.01)。中介效应检验表明,自我一致性在消极应对方式与污名之间仅起部分中介作用,中介效应占总效应的40.54%。结论消极应对方式不仅直接影响双相情感障碍抑郁患者的污名,而且通过自我一致性间接影响污名。医务人员可以基于这一路径进行干预,以减少双相情感障碍抑郁症患者的耻辱感。关键词:抑郁症;双相情感障碍;污名;自洽性;应对方式;路径分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37482
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
The role of grid management in community epidemic prevention and control and its implication to community health service systems Application of narrative nursing in a COVID-19 patient with acute stress disorder Influence of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude on protective behavior among clinical nurses Effects of nursing based on PRECEDE-PROCEED in community patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus Effects of nurse as standardized patient in clinical apprenticeship and objective structured clinical examination of psychiatric nursing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1