COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL TRAINING VS TRADITIONAL TRAINING ON ADL'S IN THE OLDER ADULT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Katie Boydstun, Mary G. b. Ware, Wesley Daughdrill, Jarrod joel, S. Colson
{"title":"COMPARISON OF FUNCTIONAL TRAINING VS TRADITIONAL TRAINING ON ADL'S IN THE OLDER ADULT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW","authors":"Katie Boydstun, Mary G. b. Ware, Wesley Daughdrill, Jarrod joel, S. Colson","doi":"10.34107/kszv7781.10459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Age related loss of muscle strength can impact the older adult’s ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Both traditional and functional strength training has shown to improve overall strength in the elderly. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate whether traditional or functional training has a greater impact on improving ADL performance in older, community dwelling adults. Databases were utilized for article searching. Key search words included: functional training, traditional training, older adults, and ADLs. Results were screened by title, abstract, and full text, respectively. Inclusion criteria consisted of: written in English, publication 2010-2020, participants’ community-dwelling ≥ 65 years old. Studies focusing on participants with medical conditions were excluded. Five articles remained after screening. 722 participants were included in the five studies. One of five studies showed no significant difference in ADL performance between traditional and functional training. Three of five studies indicated a significant difference in favor of functional over traditional training in a least one ADL outcome measure. One study showed significant within group improvements for both traditional and functional training but did not indicate between group differences. The findings indicate while both functional and traditional training improves ADL’s, functional training showed more significant gains.","PeriodicalId":75599,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical sciences instrumentation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical sciences instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34107/kszv7781.10459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Age related loss of muscle strength can impact the older adult’s ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL). Both traditional and functional strength training has shown to improve overall strength in the elderly. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate whether traditional or functional training has a greater impact on improving ADL performance in older, community dwelling adults. Databases were utilized for article searching. Key search words included: functional training, traditional training, older adults, and ADLs. Results were screened by title, abstract, and full text, respectively. Inclusion criteria consisted of: written in English, publication 2010-2020, participants’ community-dwelling ≥ 65 years old. Studies focusing on participants with medical conditions were excluded. Five articles remained after screening. 722 participants were included in the five studies. One of five studies showed no significant difference in ADL performance between traditional and functional training. Three of five studies indicated a significant difference in favor of functional over traditional training in a least one ADL outcome measure. One study showed significant within group improvements for both traditional and functional training but did not indicate between group differences. The findings indicate while both functional and traditional training improves ADL’s, functional training showed more significant gains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人ADL功能训练与传统训练的比较
与年龄相关的肌肉力量丧失会影响老年人进行日常生活活动(ADL)的能力。传统力量训练和功能性力量训练都能提高老年人的整体力量。本系统综述的目的是调查传统或功能性训练是否对改善老年社区成年人的ADL表现有更大的影响。数据库被用于文章搜索。关键词包括:功能训练、传统训练、老年人和日常生活能力。结果分别按标题、摘要和全文进行筛选。纳入标准包括:以英语撰写,出版于2010-2020年,参与者的社区居住年龄≥65岁。重点关注有疾病的参与者的研究被排除在外。筛选后仍有五篇文章。722名参与者参与了这五项研究。五项研究中有一项显示,传统训练和功能训练在ADL表现上没有显著差异。五项研究中有三项表明,在至少一项ADL结果测量中,功能训练优于传统训练有显著差异。一项研究表明,传统训练和功能训练在组内都有显著改善,但没有表明组间的差异。研究结果表明,虽然功能训练和传统训练都能提高ADL,但功能训练表现出更显著的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Roles of Echocardiography in Teaching of Cardiovascular Physiology at Pre-Clinical Level of Undergraduate Medical Education Positively Charged Water as a Tumor Growth Stimulator Impact of COVID-19 on Liver Function Tests Among Sudanese Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study of Khartoum State Analysis of the Mechanism of Salvia miltiorrhiza in the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Based on Network Pharmacology Serological Status of Viral Hepatitis B and Associated Factors Among Sex Workers in Douala (Littoral-Cameroon)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1