Unfathered Connections: Samuel Beckett and Djuna Barnes

IF 0.3 4区 文学 N/A LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3366/jobs.2023.0388
Georgina Nugent
{"title":"Unfathered Connections: Samuel Beckett and Djuna Barnes","authors":"Georgina Nugent","doi":"10.3366/jobs.2023.0388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores Beckett’s engagement with Djuna Barnes, starting with their epistolary exchanges in the 1970s and working back to his reading of her work in the 1930s in order to position Barnes as yet another modernist woman writer who, along with Gertrude Stein, facilitated Beckett’s transition away from Joyce in the 1930s. It explores their shared connection with James Joyce before developing on two key comparative critical readings of their aesthetics by Tyrus Miller and Daniela Caselli in order to situate Barnes as a valid aesthetic counterpoint to Joyce, a development on the ‘Nominalism’ versus ‘Realism’ dyad Beckett establishes between Gertrude Stein and Joyce in the 1937 Kaun letter. Borrowing from Barnes’s own late reflection on Nightwood, this article builds on extant criticism of Beckett and Barnes to situate Barnes’s ‘histrionic’ and ‘verballistic’ writings within the constellation of women authors whose work facilitated the development of Beckett’s ‘literature of the non-word’, and an important progression on from the (Steinian) ‘nominalistic irony’ Beckett identifies in the 1937 Kaun letter as a ‘necessary’ step towards his desired aesthetics. The essay argues that Barnes’s work represents a significant point of contact within this transitional period in Beckett’s aesthetic development, and that his identification of Barnes’s work as ‘verballistic’ in 1938, specifically the ‘shattered’ surfaces visible therein, provided Beckett with a glimpse of ‘that which lurks behind, be it something or nothing’ so central to his post-1937 aesthetics.","PeriodicalId":41421,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BECKETT STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/jobs.2023.0388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay explores Beckett’s engagement with Djuna Barnes, starting with their epistolary exchanges in the 1970s and working back to his reading of her work in the 1930s in order to position Barnes as yet another modernist woman writer who, along with Gertrude Stein, facilitated Beckett’s transition away from Joyce in the 1930s. It explores their shared connection with James Joyce before developing on two key comparative critical readings of their aesthetics by Tyrus Miller and Daniela Caselli in order to situate Barnes as a valid aesthetic counterpoint to Joyce, a development on the ‘Nominalism’ versus ‘Realism’ dyad Beckett establishes between Gertrude Stein and Joyce in the 1937 Kaun letter. Borrowing from Barnes’s own late reflection on Nightwood, this article builds on extant criticism of Beckett and Barnes to situate Barnes’s ‘histrionic’ and ‘verballistic’ writings within the constellation of women authors whose work facilitated the development of Beckett’s ‘literature of the non-word’, and an important progression on from the (Steinian) ‘nominalistic irony’ Beckett identifies in the 1937 Kaun letter as a ‘necessary’ step towards his desired aesthetics. The essay argues that Barnes’s work represents a significant point of contact within this transitional period in Beckett’s aesthetic development, and that his identification of Barnes’s work as ‘verballistic’ in 1938, specifically the ‘shattered’ surfaces visible therein, provided Beckett with a glimpse of ‘that which lurks behind, be it something or nothing’ so central to his post-1937 aesthetics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲缘:塞缪尔·贝克特和朱娜·巴恩斯
本文探讨了贝克特与朱娜·巴恩斯的交往,从他们在20世纪70年代的书信交流开始,追溯到他在20世纪30年代对她的作品的阅读,以将巴恩斯定位为另一位现代主义女作家,她与格特鲁德·斯坦一起,在20世纪90年代促成了贝克特从乔伊斯的转变。它探讨了他们与詹姆斯·乔伊斯的共同联系,然后发展了泰鲁斯·米勒和丹妮拉·卡塞利对他们美学的两个关键的比较批判解读,以将巴恩斯定位为乔伊斯的有效美学对位,这是贝克特在1937年考恩信中建立的格特鲁德·斯坦和乔伊斯之间的“名义主义”与“现实主义”二人组的发展。借用巴恩斯自己对《夜木》的后期反思,本文建立在对贝克特和巴恩斯现存批评的基础上,将巴恩斯的“表演性”和“言语性”作品置于女性作家群体中,这些女性作家的作品促进了贝克特“非词文学”的发展,贝克特在1937年考恩的信中认为,这是他走向理想美学的“必要”一步。文章认为,巴恩斯的作品代表了贝克特美学发展这一过渡时期的一个重要接触点,他在1938年将巴恩斯的工作认定为“口头的”,特别是其中可见的“破碎的”表面,让贝克特得以一窥“隐藏在背后的东西,这是他1937年后美学的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Waiting with Beckett in the Anthropocene. ‘to hesitate to die to death’: Reading Augustine and the After-life in Echo’s Bones Samuel Beckett and Technology, ed. Galina Kiryushina, Einat Adar and Mark Nixon Notes on Contributors A ‘Classic’ Revisited: May B, Compagnie Maguy Marin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1