Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award winners: A quantitative analysis between strategic planning and human resource variables

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Quality Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI:10.1080/10686967.2022.2112929
Patricia A. Lapoint
{"title":"Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award winners: A quantitative analysis between strategic planning and human resource variables","authors":"Patricia A. Lapoint","doi":"10.1080/10686967.2022.2112929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The United States Congress in 1987 voted to enact the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) with the goal of encouraging U.S. businesses and other types of organizations to approach and deploy effective quality processes in the delivery of their products and services. The MBNQA provides a framework of internal assessment for companies to use in their planning and implementation of quality initiatives. Through this internal assessment process, company leadership gains a better understanding of the alignments/linkages within its operations to modify its processes for meeting or exceeding customer expectations and requirements. The purpose of the research is to examine the extent of the alignment between strategic planning processes and human resource processes. Eleven manufacturing companies were selected for a site visit. Each of these eleven companies represents a different industry sector, geographical location, and organizational size. A survey, documents search, and personal interviews were used to collect the data. The observations of the alignment between the two construct categories show mixed results and are dependent upon the specific statistical analysis used. Therefore, research questions R1 and R2 are not confirmed.","PeriodicalId":38208,"journal":{"name":"Quality Management Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"289 - 298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2022.2112929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The United States Congress in 1987 voted to enact the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) with the goal of encouraging U.S. businesses and other types of organizations to approach and deploy effective quality processes in the delivery of their products and services. The MBNQA provides a framework of internal assessment for companies to use in their planning and implementation of quality initiatives. Through this internal assessment process, company leadership gains a better understanding of the alignments/linkages within its operations to modify its processes for meeting or exceeding customer expectations and requirements. The purpose of the research is to examine the extent of the alignment between strategic planning processes and human resource processes. Eleven manufacturing companies were selected for a site visit. Each of these eleven companies represents a different industry sector, geographical location, and organizational size. A survey, documents search, and personal interviews were used to collect the data. The observations of the alignment between the two construct categories show mixed results and are dependent upon the specific statistical analysis used. Therefore, research questions R1 and R2 are not confirmed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家质量奖得主:战略规划与人力资源变量之间的定量分析
摘要1987年,美国国会投票通过了马尔科姆·鲍德里奇国家质量奖(MBNQA),旨在鼓励美国企业和其他类型的组织在提供产品和服务时采用和部署有效的质量流程。MBNQA提供了一个内部评估框架,供公司在规划和实施质量举措时使用。通过这一内部评估过程,公司领导层更好地了解其运营中的一致性/联系,以修改其流程,满足或超过客户的期望和要求。研究的目的是检验战略规划过程和人力资源过程之间的一致性。选择了11家制造公司进行现场考察。这十一家公司中的每一家都代表着不同的行业、地理位置和组织规模。调查、文件搜索和个人访谈被用来收集数据。对两个构造类别之间的对齐的观察显示出混合的结果,并且取决于所使用的特定统计分析。因此,研究问题R1和R2未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Management Journal
Quality Management Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Private hospitals quality assessment: Evidence from Jordan using HEALTHQUAL model The Role of Top Management Commitment, Employee Involvement, and Training and Development on Employee Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector of an Emerging Economy Investigating the critical success factors for integrating Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 Determinants of working capital management for noncertified and certified firms from the EFQM Excellence Model Quality aspects vs consumption values: What affects intention to book hotels in the post-Covid era?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1