Relative Validation of a Four Weeks Retrospective Food Frequency Questionnaire versus 7-Day Paper-Based Food Records in Estimating the Intake of Energy and Nutrients in Adults

IF 1.3 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and Dietary Supplements Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.2147/nds.s310260
C. Șerban, A. Banu, Sandra Putnoky, Ștefania Ioana Butica, M. Niculescu, Salomeia Putnoky
{"title":"Relative Validation of a Four Weeks Retrospective Food Frequency Questionnaire versus 7-Day Paper-Based Food Records in Estimating the Intake of Energy and Nutrients in Adults","authors":"C. Șerban, A. Banu, Sandra Putnoky, Ștefania Ioana Butica, M. Niculescu, Salomeia Putnoky","doi":"10.2147/nds.s310260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study assessed potential differences in estimating short-term dietary intake of energy and nutrients and food consumption, between 4-week food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and 7-day food records in Romanian adults. Patients and Methods: A total of 116 participants (age range 18–74 years, 31% males and 28.4% of participants being overweight and obese) were recruited. Estimates for energy and macro- and micronutrient intakes, and food group intakes were compared between the two methods using Wilcoxon-sign-rank test, correlation coefficients, Cohen’s Kappa, Bland– Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement, and quartile classifications. Results: Cohen’s Kappa values for energy and macronutrient intakes indicated moderate agreement, ranging from 0.402 (protein) to 0.470 (fat), fair agreement for most micronutrients (0.2–0.4) and poor agreement for most food groups (<0.2). When data were cross-classified into quartiles for energy and macronutrients, about 58% of participants were cross-classified in the same quartile using both methods, while 33% of participants were cross-classified in adjacent quartiles of one method versus the other. Micronutrients (such Na, Mg, Ca, K, Fe, vitamins) had the highest degree of misclassification, on average 40% being cross-classified in the same quartile and another 40% in adjacent quartiles. Bland– Altman plots suggested that both methods were comparable for energy and all macronutrients. When the consumption of food groups was compared, correlation coefficients between methods ranged from 0.09 (legumes) to 0.26 (whole grain), indicating poor correlation. Conclusion: These results showed that the relative match of a standard FFQ, as compared to the 7-day food records, was moderate in estimating macronutrient and energy, fair for most micronutrient intakes and poor for others and as for food groups.","PeriodicalId":43423,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and Dietary Supplements","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and Dietary Supplements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/nds.s310260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed potential differences in estimating short-term dietary intake of energy and nutrients and food consumption, between 4-week food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) and 7-day food records in Romanian adults. Patients and Methods: A total of 116 participants (age range 18–74 years, 31% males and 28.4% of participants being overweight and obese) were recruited. Estimates for energy and macro- and micronutrient intakes, and food group intakes were compared between the two methods using Wilcoxon-sign-rank test, correlation coefficients, Cohen’s Kappa, Bland– Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement, and quartile classifications. Results: Cohen’s Kappa values for energy and macronutrient intakes indicated moderate agreement, ranging from 0.402 (protein) to 0.470 (fat), fair agreement for most micronutrients (0.2–0.4) and poor agreement for most food groups (<0.2). When data were cross-classified into quartiles for energy and macronutrients, about 58% of participants were cross-classified in the same quartile using both methods, while 33% of participants were cross-classified in adjacent quartiles of one method versus the other. Micronutrients (such Na, Mg, Ca, K, Fe, vitamins) had the highest degree of misclassification, on average 40% being cross-classified in the same quartile and another 40% in adjacent quartiles. Bland– Altman plots suggested that both methods were comparable for energy and all macronutrients. When the consumption of food groups was compared, correlation coefficients between methods ranged from 0.09 (legumes) to 0.26 (whole grain), indicating poor correlation. Conclusion: These results showed that the relative match of a standard FFQ, as compared to the 7-day food records, was moderate in estimating macronutrient and energy, fair for most micronutrient intakes and poor for others and as for food groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4周回顾性食物频率问卷与7天纸质食物记录在估算成人能量和营养摄入方面的相对验证
目的:本研究评估了罗马尼亚成年人4周食物频率问卷(FFQ)和7天食物记录在估计短期膳食能量和营养素摄入量以及食物消耗方面的潜在差异。患者和方法:共招募了116名参与者(年龄在18-74岁之间,31%为男性,28.4%的参与者超重和肥胖)。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验、相关系数、Cohen’s Kappa、Bland–Altman图(95%的一致性极限)和四分位数分类,比较了两种方法对能量、宏观和微量营养素摄入量以及食物组摄入量的估计值。结果:能量和大量营养素摄入量的Cohen Kappa值显示中度一致,范围从0.402(蛋白质)到0.470(脂肪),大多数微量营养素的一致性尚可(0.2-0.4),大多数食物组的一致性较差(<0.2),使用这两种方法,约58%的参与者被交叉分类在同一个四分位数中,而33%的参与者被一种方法与另一种方法交叉分类在相邻的四分位数。微量营养素(如Na、Mg、Ca、K、Fe、维生素)的错误分类程度最高,平均40%在同一四分位数中交叉分类,另有40%在相邻四分位数。Bland–Altman图表明,这两种方法在能量和所有常量营养素方面具有可比性。当比较食物组的消费时,方法之间的相关系数在0.09(豆类)到0.26(全谷物)之间,表明相关性较差。结论:这些结果表明,与7天的食物记录相比,标准FFQ的相对匹配在估计大量营养素和能量方面是中等的,对大多数微量营养素摄入量来说是公平的,对其他人和食物组来说是差的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition and Dietary Supplements is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on research into nutritional requirements in health and disease, impact on metabolism and the identification and optimal use of dietary strategies and supplements necessary for normal growth and development. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Epidemiology, prevalence of related disorders such as obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemias Biochemistry and cellular metabolism of nutrients Effect of nutrition on metabolic control Impact of hormones and genetics on nutrient handling Identification of cofactors and development of effective supplementation strategies Dietary strategies Behavior modification Consumer and patient adherence, quality of life Public Health Policy & Health Economics.
期刊最新文献
Cross-Sectional Survey of Adulterated Sexual Enhancement Products Sold in the Sacramento Area of California Cannabidiol (CBD) Upregulates Vitamin D3 Receptors (VDRs) Expression That Modulates Cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6), Tissue Elasticity, Cellular Senescence, and Mitochondrial ATP Generation in Human and Rodent Cell Lines A Review of Amaranth Crop as a Potential Solution to Ethiopia’s Nutritional Crisis Effectiveness of Quadruple Fortified Salt Compared to Double and Single Fortified Salts in Improving Haemoglobin Levels Among Moderately Anemic Women Aged 18–49 Years in Rural Low Resource Setting: Randomized Clinical Trial Risk Factors of Overweight and Obesity Among School Children Aged 6 to 18 Years: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1