Impact of COVID-19 on Stock Indices Volatility: Long-Memory Persistence, Structural Breaks, or Both?

Q1 Decision Sciences Annals of Data Science Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s40745-022-00446-0
Abdinardo Moreira Barreto de Oliveira, Anandadeep Mandal, Gabriel J. Power
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 on Stock Indices Volatility: Long-Memory Persistence, Structural Breaks, or Both?","authors":"Abdinardo Moreira Barreto de Oliveira,&nbsp;Anandadeep Mandal,&nbsp;Gabriel J. Power","doi":"10.1007/s40745-022-00446-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has increased volatility in financial markets, motivating researchers to investigate its impact. Some use the GARCH family of models to focus on long-memory persistence, while others use Markov chain models to better identify structural breaks and regimes. However, no study has addressed the occurrence of these two phenomena in a unified framework. Since both are important features of the data, to ignore one or the other could lead to poorly specified models. The outcome would be incorrect risk measurement, with implications for risk management, Value at risk, portfolio decisions, forecasting, and option pricing. This paper aims to fill this gap in the literature. We assemble an international dataset for 16 stock market indices in three continents over the period from August 1, 2019 to February 18, 2022, totalling 669 business days. Using R, we estimate 80 GARCH family models, 16 pure Markov-Switching models, and 900 combined GARCH/ Markov-Switching models using daily stock market log-returns. We allow for two volatility regimes (low and high). We also measure and incorporate News Impact Curves, which show how past shocks affect contemporaneous volatility. Our main finding, across estimated models, is that COVID-19 affected both long-memory persistence and volatility regimes in most markets. To describe the specific impact in each market, we report News Impact Curves. Lastly, the first wave of COVID-19 had a much greater impact on volatility than did subsequent waves linked to the emergence of new variants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36280,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Data Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40745-022-00446-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has increased volatility in financial markets, motivating researchers to investigate its impact. Some use the GARCH family of models to focus on long-memory persistence, while others use Markov chain models to better identify structural breaks and regimes. However, no study has addressed the occurrence of these two phenomena in a unified framework. Since both are important features of the data, to ignore one or the other could lead to poorly specified models. The outcome would be incorrect risk measurement, with implications for risk management, Value at risk, portfolio decisions, forecasting, and option pricing. This paper aims to fill this gap in the literature. We assemble an international dataset for 16 stock market indices in three continents over the period from August 1, 2019 to February 18, 2022, totalling 669 business days. Using R, we estimate 80 GARCH family models, 16 pure Markov-Switching models, and 900 combined GARCH/ Markov-Switching models using daily stock market log-returns. We allow for two volatility regimes (low and high). We also measure and incorporate News Impact Curves, which show how past shocks affect contemporaneous volatility. Our main finding, across estimated models, is that COVID-19 affected both long-memory persistence and volatility regimes in most markets. To describe the specific impact in each market, we report News Impact Curves. Lastly, the first wave of COVID-19 had a much greater impact on volatility than did subsequent waves linked to the emergence of new variants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19对股指波动的影响:长期记忆持续性,结构性断裂,还是两者兼而有之?
COVID-19 大流行病的爆发加剧了金融市场的波动,促使研究人员调查其影响。一些人使用 GARCH 模型系列来关注长记忆持久性,而另一些人则使用马尔科夫链模型来更好地识别结构性断裂和制度。然而,目前还没有研究在统一的框架下探讨这两种现象的发生。由于这两种现象都是数据的重要特征,忽略其中一种可能会导致模型的不完善。其结果将是错误的风险测量,对风险管理、风险价值、投资组合决策、预测和期权定价产生影响。本文旨在填补这一文献空白。我们收集了三大洲 16 个股票市场指数的国际数据集,时间跨度为 2019 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 2 月 18 日,共计 669 个工作日。我们使用 R 语言,利用每日股市对数收益率估计了 80 个 GARCH 族模型、16 个纯马尔可夫-转换模型和 900 个 GARCH/ 马尔可夫-转换组合模型。我们考虑了两种波动率机制(低波动率和高波动率)。我们还测量并纳入了新闻影响曲线,该曲线显示了过去的冲击是如何影响同期波动率的。在所有估计模型中,我们的主要发现是 COVID-19 对大多数市场的长期记忆持续性和波动率机制都产生了影响。为了描述对每个市场的具体影响,我们报告了新闻影响曲线。最后,COVID-19 的第一波对波动率的影响远远大于与新变体出现相关的后续波次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Data Science
Annals of Data Science Decision Sciences-Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Annals of Data Science (ADS) publishes cutting-edge research findings, experimental results and case studies of data science. Although Data Science is regarded as an interdisciplinary field of using mathematics, statistics, databases, data mining, high-performance computing, knowledge management and virtualization to discover knowledge from Big Data, it should have its own scientific contents, such as axioms, laws and rules, which are fundamentally important for experts in different fields to explore their own interests from Big Data. ADS encourages contributors to address such challenging problems at this exchange platform. At present, how to discover knowledge from heterogeneous data under Big Data environment needs to be addressed.     ADS is a series of volumes edited by either the editorial office or guest editors. Guest editors will be responsible for call-for-papers and the review process for high-quality contributions in their volumes.
期刊最新文献
Non-negative Sparse Matrix Factorization for Soft Clustering of Territory Risk Analysis Kernel Method for Estimating Matusita Overlapping Coefficient Using Numerical Approximations Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Generalized Inflated Power Series Distributions Farm-Level Smart Crop Recommendation Framework Using Machine Learning Reaction Function for Financial Market Reacting to Events or Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1