Parental engagement and implementation fidelity in a mHealth motor skills intervention for young children.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-15 DOI:10.1080/17408989.2023.2235394
Amanda E Staiano, Sanjoy Saha, Robbie A Beyl, Chelsea L Kracht, Robert L Newton, E Kipling Webster
{"title":"Parental engagement and implementation fidelity in a mHealth motor skills intervention for young children.","authors":"Amanda E Staiano, Sanjoy Saha, Robbie A Beyl, Chelsea L Kracht, Robert L Newton, E Kipling Webster","doi":"10.1080/17408989.2023.2235394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mobile apps (i.e., mHealth) provide unprecedented opportunity for widespread dissemination of health behavior programs. However, for programs directed towards young children, parental engagement may explain differing results of mHealth programs. Within the context of an app-based fundamental motor skill (FMS) intervention that improved children's motor skills (PLAY), this paper examines parents' fidelity to the intervention and the extent to which fidelity was related to children's motor skill improvements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the PLAY trial, 72 children aged 3-5 years were randomized for their parents to access a Motor Skills app or Free Play app for a 12-week intervention. The Motor Skills app contained lessons, videos, and activity breaks totaling 1 hour/week of directed FMS instruction by the parent to the child over a 12-week period. The Free Play app was similar in appearance and format but focused on unstructured physical activity. Children's FMS were evaluated with the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-3) at baseline, 12-weeks, and 24-week follow-up. Implementation fidelity data included dosage completed (activity breaks completed), parental engagement (duration of video views), and quality of intervention delivery (feasibility and acceptability). Dosage and engagement were dichotomized within the Motor Skills condition into high vs. low. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine the association of dosage completed and parental engagement with changes in children's FMS both within and between conditions. The level of significance was set at 0.05 for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children completed 70% (8.4 of 12 hours) of the prescribed activity breaks based on parental report in the Motor Skills condition and 87% (10.4 of 12 hours) in the Free Play condition (not significantly different). Parental engagement based on video viewing duration for the Motor Skills condition was on average 8.0 ± 8.6 of the 9.8 available minutes and for the Free Play condition was 5.0 ± 5.5 of the available 18 minutes, with no significant difference between conditions. Parents rated high acceptability and usability for both apps. Children in the Motor Skills condition improved their FMS more than children in the Free Play condition regardless of whether they were classified as receiving high or low dosage or high or low parental engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parents and children consistently engaged with a 12-week Motor Skills app intervention, and the salience of FMS improvements did not differ by the level of parent fidelity or engagement with the mHealth app. The intervention potency, parental engagement, and dosage completed were sufficient to produce the desired child motor skills improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":47917,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy","volume":" ","pages":"390-402"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12326528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2023.2235394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mobile apps (i.e., mHealth) provide unprecedented opportunity for widespread dissemination of health behavior programs. However, for programs directed towards young children, parental engagement may explain differing results of mHealth programs. Within the context of an app-based fundamental motor skill (FMS) intervention that improved children's motor skills (PLAY), this paper examines parents' fidelity to the intervention and the extent to which fidelity was related to children's motor skill improvements.

Methods: In the PLAY trial, 72 children aged 3-5 years were randomized for their parents to access a Motor Skills app or Free Play app for a 12-week intervention. The Motor Skills app contained lessons, videos, and activity breaks totaling 1 hour/week of directed FMS instruction by the parent to the child over a 12-week period. The Free Play app was similar in appearance and format but focused on unstructured physical activity. Children's FMS were evaluated with the Test of Gross Motor Development (TGMD-3) at baseline, 12-weeks, and 24-week follow-up. Implementation fidelity data included dosage completed (activity breaks completed), parental engagement (duration of video views), and quality of intervention delivery (feasibility and acceptability). Dosage and engagement were dichotomized within the Motor Skills condition into high vs. low. Linear mixed effects models were used to examine the association of dosage completed and parental engagement with changes in children's FMS both within and between conditions. The level of significance was set at 0.05 for all analyses.

Results: Children completed 70% (8.4 of 12 hours) of the prescribed activity breaks based on parental report in the Motor Skills condition and 87% (10.4 of 12 hours) in the Free Play condition (not significantly different). Parental engagement based on video viewing duration for the Motor Skills condition was on average 8.0 ± 8.6 of the 9.8 available minutes and for the Free Play condition was 5.0 ± 5.5 of the available 18 minutes, with no significant difference between conditions. Parents rated high acceptability and usability for both apps. Children in the Motor Skills condition improved their FMS more than children in the Free Play condition regardless of whether they were classified as receiving high or low dosage or high or low parental engagement.

Conclusion: Parents and children consistently engaged with a 12-week Motor Skills app intervention, and the salience of FMS improvements did not differ by the level of parent fidelity or engagement with the mHealth app. The intervention potency, parental engagement, and dosage completed were sufficient to produce the desired child motor skills improvements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
mHealth幼儿运动技能干预中的父母参与度和实施忠诚度
引言:移动应用程序(即移动健康)为健康行为项目的广泛传播提供了前所未有的机会。然而,对于针对幼儿的项目,父母的参与可能解释了移动健康项目的不同结果。在基于应用程序的基本运动技能(FMS)干预提高儿童运动技能(PLAY)的背景下,本文研究了父母对干预的忠诚程度以及忠诚程度与儿童运动技能提高的关系。方法:在PLAY试验中,72名3-5岁的儿童被随机分配给他们的父母,让他们使用Motor Skills应用程序或Free PLAY应用程序进行为期12周的干预。运动技能应用程序包含课程、视频和活动休息,在12周的时间里,父母对孩子进行每周1小时的直接FMS指导。Free Play应用在外观和格式上都很相似,但侧重于非结构化的体力活动。在基线、12周和24周随访时,采用大肌肉运动发育测试(TGMD-3)评估儿童FMS。实施保真度数据包括完成剂量(活动休息完成)、家长参与(视频观看时间)和干预交付质量(可行性和可接受性)。在运动技能条件下,剂量和参与分为高和低。使用线性混合效应模型来检验完成剂量和父母参与与条件内和条件间儿童FMS变化的关系。所有分析的显著性水平设为0.05。结果:儿童在运动技能条件下完成了父母报告的70%(8.4 / 12小时)的规定活动休息,在自由游戏条件下完成了87%(10.4 / 12小时)(无显著差异)。基于视频观看时间的父母参与在运动技能条件下平均为8.0±8.6分钟(9.8分钟),在自由游戏条件下平均为5.0±5.5分钟(18分钟),两种条件之间无显著差异。家长们对这两款应用的可接受性和可用性评价都很高。运动技能组的孩子比自由游戏组的孩子在FMS方面的改善更大,无论他们是接受高剂量还是低剂量,还是父母参与度高或低。结论:父母和孩子一致参与了为期12周的运动技能应用程序干预,并且FMS改善的显著性并不因父母的忠诚程度或对移动健康应用程序的参与程度而有所不同。干预的效力、父母的参与和完成的剂量足以产生期望的儿童运动技能改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy is the official research journal of the Association for Physical Education (AfPE). The journal provides a forum for high quality educational research intended to have a high impact on both policy and practice for a national and international readership. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy publishes research that reports educational practices in all appropriate contexts including, but not limited to, school physical education, club sport, and active leisure programs. The journal considers papers that discuss a broad range of physical activities, including aquatics, dance, exercise, gymnastics, outdoor and adventure activities, meditative and martial arts and sport. Pedagogy in these contexts refers to the interacting and interdependent components of knowledge and curriculum, learners and learning, and teachers/coaches, teaching/coaching and teacher/coach education. The journal particularly welcomes papers that consider the interactions of each of these components and their practice in specific contexts.
期刊最新文献
Exploring core practices for dance educators: towards a practice-based pedagogy in Korean dance education The ‘Good!’, the ‘Great!’ and the ‘Brilliant!’: exclamations and teacher artwork in volleyball teaching Curricular intervention in physical education to prevent bullying: A-Judo programme Who influences whom: do students' perceptions of physical education teacher's (de)motivating styles shape student motivation, vice versa, or both? Meaningful physical education versus autonomy support: effects on self-determined motivation and affectivity during a fitness unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1