Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Proportion of Null HypothesesÃÂ0 in High Dimensional Data When the Test Statistics is Continuous

I. Dialsingh, Sherwin P Cedeno
{"title":"Comparison of Methods for Estimating the Proportion of Null HypothesesÃÂ0 in High Dimensional Data When the Test Statistics is Continuous","authors":"I. Dialsingh, Sherwin P Cedeno","doi":"10.4172/2155-6180.1000343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in Genomics have re-energized interest in multiple hypothesis testing procedures but have simultaneously created new methodological and computational challenges. In Genomics for instance, it is now commonplace for experiments to measure expression levels in thousands of genes creating large multiplicity problems when thousands of hypotheses are to be tested simultaneously. Within this context we seek to identify differentially expressed genes, that is, genes whose expression levels are associated with a particular response or covariate of interest. The False Discovery Rate (FDR) is the preferred measure since the Family Wise Error Rates (FWERs) are usually overly restrictive. In the FDR methods, estimation of the proportion of null hypotheses (π0) is an important parameter that needs to be estimated. In this paper, we compare the effectiveness of 12 methods for estimating π0 when the test statistics are continuous using simulated data with independent, weak dependence, and moderate dependence structures.","PeriodicalId":87294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6180.1000343","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Advances in Genomics have re-energized interest in multiple hypothesis testing procedures but have simultaneously created new methodological and computational challenges. In Genomics for instance, it is now commonplace for experiments to measure expression levels in thousands of genes creating large multiplicity problems when thousands of hypotheses are to be tested simultaneously. Within this context we seek to identify differentially expressed genes, that is, genes whose expression levels are associated with a particular response or covariate of interest. The False Discovery Rate (FDR) is the preferred measure since the Family Wise Error Rates (FWERs) are usually overly restrictive. In the FDR methods, estimation of the proportion of null hypotheses (π0) is an important parameter that needs to be estimated. In this paper, we compare the effectiveness of 12 methods for estimating π0 when the test statistics are continuous using simulated data with independent, weak dependence, and moderate dependence structures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测试统计量连续时高维数据中Null比例估算方法的比较HypothesesÃÂ0
基因组学的进步重新激发了人们对多种假设检验程序的兴趣,但同时也带来了新的方法学和计算挑战。例如,在基因组学中,现在测量数千个基因的表达水平的实验很常见,当同时测试数千个假设时,会产生巨大的多重性问题。在这种背景下,我们试图识别差异表达的基因,即其表达水平与感兴趣的特定反应或协变量相关的基因。错误发现率(FDR)是首选的衡量标准,因为家族错误率(FWER)通常过于严格。在FDR方法中,零假设比例(π0)的估计是需要估计的一个重要参数。在本文中,我们使用具有独立、弱依赖和中等依赖结构的模拟数据,比较了当测试统计量是连续的时,估计π0的12种方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PROSPECTIVELY ESTIMATING THE AGE OF INITIATION OF E-CIGARETTES AMONG U.S. YOUTH: FINDINGS FROM THE POPULATION ASSESSMENT OF TOBACCO AND HEALTH (PATH) STUDY, 2013-2017. The Kumaraswamy-Rani Distribution and Its Applications Analytical Visual Methods to Describe Practice Patterns in a Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Non-Interventional Disease Registry Short Prognostic APP for Multiple Myeloma Sample Size Charts for Spearman and Kendall Coefficients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1