Contributing factors to providing an effective community-based forensic service for people with a learning disability: a literature review

A. Wark
{"title":"Contributing factors to providing an effective community-based forensic service for people with a learning disability: a literature review","authors":"A. Wark","doi":"10.1108/jidob-03-2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nLegislative guidance stipulates that people with a learning disability have the right to receive local provision of personalised support within the least restrictive environment. On these bases there is a growing emphasis on the requirement for local authorities to develop appropriate services for people who are currently in a hospital setting. The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature addressing factors influencing the provision of effective community-based forensic services.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe six articles were analysed separately using the evaluation tool – Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose. The six articles used divergent sample groups and employed both qualitative and quantitative methods to collate data. The articles shared a purpose of examining forensic community service provision with an aim to improve services.\n\n\nFindings\nThere were three themes that emerged consistently across the literature these included: balancing risk management vs individual autonomy; multi-disciplinary and multi-agency working; service improvement. There is a growing emphasis on the need to replace long-term hospital placements with specialist, community provision, employing least restrictive methods and positive responses to crisis situations. In this climate, it is crucial that multi-disciplinary agencies from local authority, health and the charitable and private sector continue to work collaboratively on the integration of service provision in order to bring about the development of effective and responsive community services.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nResearch limited to peer reviewed and published research papers focusing on the subject of community forensic services with publications specifically made within the time frame of the Transforming Care Agenda.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper looks to examine the practical solutions to providing effective community forensic services for a person with an intellectual disability and makes recommendations for research into improving service specific training for support staff.\n\n\nSocial implications\nFollowing the Winterbourne View Hospital scandal (BBC One, 2011) instigations were made to make legislative change under the Transforming Care Agenda. Despite a renewed conviction in the rights of people to be a part of their local community without segregation or discrimination, professionals in the field continue to report a failure to reduce numbers of people in long stay hospitals and secure settings. With commissioning under pressure to make these intentions a reality it is a really good time to reflect on practice and evaluate service models to establish the factors that bring about positive outcomes for individuals enabling inclusion within community settings.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis review will focus on the literature evidencing positive intervention and outcome focussed methods of supporting people with a forensic history in the community. This is an entirely original piece of work analysing peer reviewed and published research.\n","PeriodicalId":43468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jidob-03-2019-0005","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jidob-03-2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Legislative guidance stipulates that people with a learning disability have the right to receive local provision of personalised support within the least restrictive environment. On these bases there is a growing emphasis on the requirement for local authorities to develop appropriate services for people who are currently in a hospital setting. The purpose of this paper is to examine the literature addressing factors influencing the provision of effective community-based forensic services. Design/methodology/approach The six articles were analysed separately using the evaluation tool – Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose. The six articles used divergent sample groups and employed both qualitative and quantitative methods to collate data. The articles shared a purpose of examining forensic community service provision with an aim to improve services. Findings There were three themes that emerged consistently across the literature these included: balancing risk management vs individual autonomy; multi-disciplinary and multi-agency working; service improvement. There is a growing emphasis on the need to replace long-term hospital placements with specialist, community provision, employing least restrictive methods and positive responses to crisis situations. In this climate, it is crucial that multi-disciplinary agencies from local authority, health and the charitable and private sector continue to work collaboratively on the integration of service provision in order to bring about the development of effective and responsive community services. Research limitations/implications Research limited to peer reviewed and published research papers focusing on the subject of community forensic services with publications specifically made within the time frame of the Transforming Care Agenda. Practical implications This paper looks to examine the practical solutions to providing effective community forensic services for a person with an intellectual disability and makes recommendations for research into improving service specific training for support staff. Social implications Following the Winterbourne View Hospital scandal (BBC One, 2011) instigations were made to make legislative change under the Transforming Care Agenda. Despite a renewed conviction in the rights of people to be a part of their local community without segregation or discrimination, professionals in the field continue to report a failure to reduce numbers of people in long stay hospitals and secure settings. With commissioning under pressure to make these intentions a reality it is a really good time to reflect on practice and evaluate service models to establish the factors that bring about positive outcomes for individuals enabling inclusion within community settings. Originality/value This review will focus on the literature evidencing positive intervention and outcome focussed methods of supporting people with a forensic history in the community. This is an entirely original piece of work analysing peer reviewed and published research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为有学习障碍的人提供有效的社区法医服务的因素:文献综述
目的立法指导规定,学习障碍者有权在限制最少的环境中获得当地提供的个性化支持。在此基础上,人们越来越强调要求地方当局为目前在医院的人提供适当的服务。本文的目的是审查有关影响提供有效的社区法医服务的因素的文献。设计/方法/方法使用评估工具——货币、相关性、权威性、准确性、目的——分别分析了这六篇文章。这六篇文章使用了不同的样本组,并采用了定性和定量的方法来整理数据。这些文章的共同目的是审查法医社区服务的提供,以改善服务。发现文献中一致出现了三个主题,包括:平衡风险管理与个人自主;多学科和多机构工作;服务改进。人们越来越强调有必要用专家、社区服务、使用限制最少的方法和对危机情况的积极反应来取代长期的医院安置。在这种情况下,至关重要的是,来自地方当局、卫生、慈善和私营部门的多学科机构应继续合作,整合服务提供,以发展有效和响应迅速的社区服务。研究局限性/影响研究仅限于同行评审和发表的研究论文,重点关注社区法医服务,并在《转变护理议程》的时间框架内专门发表出版物。实际影响本文旨在探讨为患有精神分裂症的人提供有效社区法医服务的实际解决方案智力残疾,并就改进支助人员服务特定培训的研究提出建议。社会影响Winterbourne View医院丑闻(BBC One,2011)之后,根据《转变护理议程》,人们发起了立法改革。尽管人们重新相信人们有权在不受隔离或歧视的情况下成为当地社区的一部分,但该领域的专业人员仍报告称,未能减少长期住院医院和安全环境中的人数。由于委托工作面临着使这些意图成为现实的压力,现在是反思实践和评估服务模式的好时机,以确定为个人带来积极结果的因素,从而使其能够融入社区环境。原创性/价值本综述将重点关注证明积极干预和以结果为中心的方法支持社区中有法医史的人的文献。这是一篇分析同行评审和发表的研究的完全原创的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Trauma and adversity in forensic patients with an intellectual disability: a review of risk assessment reports What is important in forensic psychiatric evaluation in people with Down syndrome? A sample from Türkiye Demographic, forensic and service involvement characteristics related to adults referred to a community-based learning disability forensic team pre- and post-COVID-19 The relationship between institutional climate and constructive deviance A feasibility study to identify the presence of autism specific risk factors in secure services using an autism specific framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1