Active upper limb prostheses: a review on current state and upcoming breakthroughs

IF 5 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI:10.1088/2516-1091/acac57
A. Marinelli, N. Boccardo, F. Tessari, Dario Di Domenico, G. Caserta, M. Canepa, G. Gini, G. Barresi, M. Laffranchi, L. de Michieli, M. Semprini
{"title":"Active upper limb prostheses: a review on current state and upcoming breakthroughs","authors":"A. Marinelli, N. Boccardo, F. Tessari, Dario Di Domenico, G. Caserta, M. Canepa, G. Gini, G. Barresi, M. Laffranchi, L. de Michieli, M. Semprini","doi":"10.1088/2516-1091/acac57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The journey of a prosthetic user is characterized by the opportunities and the limitations of a device that should enable activities of daily living (ADL). In particular, experiencing a bionic hand as a functional (and, advantageously, embodied) limb constitutes the premise for promoting the practice in using the device, mitigating the risk of its abandonment. In order to achieve such a result, different aspects need to be considered for making the artificial limb an effective solution to accomplish ADL. According to such a perspective, this review aims at presenting the current issues and at envisioning the upcoming breakthroughs in upper limb prosthetic devices. We first define the sources of input and feedback involved in the system control (at user-level and device-level), alongside the related algorithms used in signal analysis. Moreover, the paper focuses on the user-centered design challenges and strategies that guide the implementation of novel solutions in this area in terms of technology acceptance, embodiment, and, in general, human-machine integration based on co-adaptive processes. We here provide the readers (belonging to the target communities of researchers, designers, developers, clinicians, industrial stakeholders, and end-users) with an overview of the state-of-the-art and the potential innovations in bionic hands features, hopefully promoting interdisciplinary efforts for solving current issues of upper limb prostheses. The integration of different perspectives should be the premise to a transdisciplinary intertwining leading to a truly holistic comprehension and improvement of the bionic hands design. Overall, this paper aims to move the boundaries in prosthetic innovation beyond the development of a tool and toward the engineering of human-centered artificial limbs.","PeriodicalId":74582,"journal":{"name":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2516-1091/acac57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The journey of a prosthetic user is characterized by the opportunities and the limitations of a device that should enable activities of daily living (ADL). In particular, experiencing a bionic hand as a functional (and, advantageously, embodied) limb constitutes the premise for promoting the practice in using the device, mitigating the risk of its abandonment. In order to achieve such a result, different aspects need to be considered for making the artificial limb an effective solution to accomplish ADL. According to such a perspective, this review aims at presenting the current issues and at envisioning the upcoming breakthroughs in upper limb prosthetic devices. We first define the sources of input and feedback involved in the system control (at user-level and device-level), alongside the related algorithms used in signal analysis. Moreover, the paper focuses on the user-centered design challenges and strategies that guide the implementation of novel solutions in this area in terms of technology acceptance, embodiment, and, in general, human-machine integration based on co-adaptive processes. We here provide the readers (belonging to the target communities of researchers, designers, developers, clinicians, industrial stakeholders, and end-users) with an overview of the state-of-the-art and the potential innovations in bionic hands features, hopefully promoting interdisciplinary efforts for solving current issues of upper limb prostheses. The integration of different perspectives should be the premise to a transdisciplinary intertwining leading to a truly holistic comprehension and improvement of the bionic hands design. Overall, this paper aims to move the boundaries in prosthetic innovation beyond the development of a tool and toward the engineering of human-centered artificial limbs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动上肢假体:现状及未来的突破
义肢使用者的旅程的特点是机会和设备的局限性,应该使日常生活活动(ADL)。特别是,体验仿生手作为一个功能(并且,有利的是,具体化)肢体构成了促进使用该设备的实践的前提,减轻了其放弃的风险。为了达到这样的效果,需要考虑不同的方面,使假肢成为实现ADL的有效解决方案。基于这一观点,本文旨在介绍目前上肢假肢装置存在的问题,并展望未来的突破。我们首先定义了系统控制(用户级和设备级)中涉及的输入和反馈的来源,以及信号分析中使用的相关算法。此外,本文还重点介绍了以用户为中心的设计挑战和策略,这些挑战和策略指导了该领域在技术接受、实施以及基于共同适应过程的人机集成方面的新解决方案的实施。我们在这里为读者(属于研究人员、设计师、开发人员、临床医生、工业利益相关者和最终用户的目标群体)提供了仿生手特征的最新技术和潜在创新的概述,希望促进跨学科的努力来解决当前上肢假肢的问题。不同观点的整合应该是跨学科相互交织的前提,从而真正全面地理解和改进仿生手的设计。总体而言,本文旨在将假肢创新的界限从工具的开发转向以人为中心的假肢工程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of bioengineered 3D patient derived breast cancer organoid model focusing dynamic fibroblast-stem cell reciprocity. Biomedical applications of the engineered AIEgen-lipid nanostructurein vitroandin vivo. Cell stretching devices integrated with live cell imaging: a powerful approach to study how cells react to mechanical cues. Mathematical models on bone cell homeostasis and kinetics in the presence of electric fields: a review. A review of computational optimization of bone scaffold architecture: methods, challenges, and perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1