Defining an effective approach to blended learning in higher education: A systematic review

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-25 DOI:10.14742/ajet.8489
Shaun Mccarthy, E. Palmer
{"title":"Defining an effective approach to blended learning in higher education: A systematic review","authors":"Shaun Mccarthy, E. Palmer","doi":"10.14742/ajet.8489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blended learning has enjoyed wide acceptance as a teaching and learning approach in higher education, but its use and understanding commonly fail to extend across all levels of blending. At the institutional level, challenges still exist in aligning a blended learning approach with core university priorities. Often, there is a focus on the provisions of technology tools and associated training; however, there is less emphasis on the development of frameworks that support an institutional-level approach to blended teaching and learning and ways that these can be effectively measured. This paper analyses previous work undertaken in the field of blended learning and looks to build on the literature by defining an effective approach to adoption using conceptual clarity, blended frameworks and institutional-level implementation of blended learning as a framework to describe effective use within higher education.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nUniversity decision makers should define an institutional approach to blended learning and foster a common understanding of what success will look like.\nInstitutional strategy must carefully consider the multifaceted roles of students, academics and administrators within blended learning.\nBlended learning adoption should be measured using criteria and descriptive standards to evaluate framework implementation.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blended learning has enjoyed wide acceptance as a teaching and learning approach in higher education, but its use and understanding commonly fail to extend across all levels of blending. At the institutional level, challenges still exist in aligning a blended learning approach with core university priorities. Often, there is a focus on the provisions of technology tools and associated training; however, there is less emphasis on the development of frameworks that support an institutional-level approach to blended teaching and learning and ways that these can be effectively measured. This paper analyses previous work undertaken in the field of blended learning and looks to build on the literature by defining an effective approach to adoption using conceptual clarity, blended frameworks and institutional-level implementation of blended learning as a framework to describe effective use within higher education. Implications for practice or policy: University decision makers should define an institutional approach to blended learning and foster a common understanding of what success will look like. Institutional strategy must carefully consider the multifaceted roles of students, academics and administrators within blended learning. Blended learning adoption should be measured using criteria and descriptive standards to evaluate framework implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定义高等教育中混合学习的有效方法:系统综述
在高等教育中,混合式学习作为一种教学方法已经被广泛接受,但它的使用和理解通常不能扩展到所有层次的混合。在机构层面,将混合学习方法与大学的核心重点相结合仍然存在挑战。通常,重点是提供技术工具和相关培训;然而,对于制定支持机构级混合教与学方法的框架以及有效衡量这些方法的方法的重视程度较低。本文分析了以前在混合学习领域开展的工作,并希望通过定义一种有效的采用方法来建立文献,使用概念清晰度,混合框架和机构层面的混合学习实施作为框架来描述高等教育中的有效使用。对实践或政策的启示:大学决策者应该定义一种混合式学习的制度方法,并促进对成功的共同理解。机构战略必须仔细考虑学生、学者和管理人员在混合式学习中的多重角色。混合学习的采用应该使用标准和描述性标准来评估框架的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Academics' perceptions of ChatGPT-generated written outputs: A practical application of Turing’s Imitation Game Effects of a ChatGPT-based flipped learning guiding approach on learners’ courseware project performances and perceptions University teachers’ well-being in ICT-enhanced teaching: The roles of teacher self-efficacy and teaching support Digital transformation in engineering education: Exploring the potential of AI-assisted learning Investigation of student experiences with ChatGPT-supported online learning applications in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1