Percutaneous intra-articular tranexamic acid following total knee arthroplasty without drainage to reduce blood loss

E. Gericke, J. F. Beer, M. Deacon, L. Marais
{"title":"Percutaneous intra-articular tranexamic acid following total knee arthroplasty without drainage to reduce blood loss","authors":"E. Gericke, J. F. Beer, M. Deacon, L. Marais","doi":"10.17159/2309-8309/2020/v19n2a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) peri-operatively is a well-recognised strategy used by orthopaedic surgeons to reduce blood loss during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Furthermore, not using a drain has been advocated to be a safe and effective way to further reduce blood loss. The main aim of this study is to assess the effect of a combination of these two strategies on total blood loss associated with TKA. \nMethods: This is a retrospective study conducted on a single surgeon’s data gathered over a two-year period. This study compares the blood loss in two groups of patients. The control group received no antifibrinolytic agents and a drain was inserted, while the study group received TXA and the drain was omitted. \nResults: A total of 109 patients were included in the analysis, with 86 patients in the study group and 23 patients in the control group. The two groups were compared in terms of pre-operative haemoglobin, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and body mass index (BMI). The mean age of the study group was lower than that of the control group (64±8 years vs 68±9 years; p=0.03). The mean total blood loss was lower in the study group compared to the control group (mean difference 171.8 ml; 95% CI 31.2–312.2; p=0.01). Duration of hospital stay was also reduced in the study group (2.4 days vs 3.1 days; p=0.003). There was, however, no difference in the functional outcome according to the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). \nConclusion: These findings are in accordance with previous studies, indicating that intra-articular administration of TXA and omission of negative pressure drainage may be associated with a reduction in blood loss following TKA. Larger, well-designed studies are required to determine the optimal TXA administration strategy. \nLevel of evidence: Level 4","PeriodicalId":32220,"journal":{"name":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"74-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2020/v19n2a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) peri-operatively is a well-recognised strategy used by orthopaedic surgeons to reduce blood loss during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Furthermore, not using a drain has been advocated to be a safe and effective way to further reduce blood loss. The main aim of this study is to assess the effect of a combination of these two strategies on total blood loss associated with TKA. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on a single surgeon’s data gathered over a two-year period. This study compares the blood loss in two groups of patients. The control group received no antifibrinolytic agents and a drain was inserted, while the study group received TXA and the drain was omitted. Results: A total of 109 patients were included in the analysis, with 86 patients in the study group and 23 patients in the control group. The two groups were compared in terms of pre-operative haemoglobin, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and body mass index (BMI). The mean age of the study group was lower than that of the control group (64±8 years vs 68±9 years; p=0.03). The mean total blood loss was lower in the study group compared to the control group (mean difference 171.8 ml; 95% CI 31.2–312.2; p=0.01). Duration of hospital stay was also reduced in the study group (2.4 days vs 3.1 days; p=0.003). There was, however, no difference in the functional outcome according to the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Conclusion: These findings are in accordance with previous studies, indicating that intra-articular administration of TXA and omission of negative pressure drainage may be associated with a reduction in blood loss following TKA. Larger, well-designed studies are required to determine the optimal TXA administration strategy. Level of evidence: Level 4
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全膝关节置换术后无引流经皮关节内氨甲环酸以减少失血
背景:围手术期使用氨甲环酸(TXA)是整形外科医生公认的减少全膝关节置换术(TKA)期间失血的策略。此外,不使用引流管被认为是进一步减少血液流失的安全有效的方法。本研究的主要目的是评估这两种策略的组合对TKA相关的总失血量的影响。方法:这是一项对一名外科医生在两年内收集的数据进行的回顾性研究。这项研究比较了两组患者的失血情况。对照组未接受抗纤溶剂治疗并插入引流管,而研究组接受TXA治疗并省略引流管。结果:共有109名患者被纳入分析,其中86名患者在研究组,23名患者在对照组。两组患者在术前血红蛋白、美国麻醉师协会(ASA)评分和体重指数(BMI)方面进行了比较。研究组的平均年龄低于对照组(64±8岁vs 68±9岁;p=0.03)。与对照组相比,研究组的总平均失血量较低(平均差异171.8 ml;95%CI 31.2–312.2;p=0.01)。研究组的住院时间也缩短了(2.4天vs 3.1天;p=0.003),根据膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)的功能结果没有差异。结论:这些发现与先前的研究一致,表明关节内给予TXA和省略负压引流可能与TKA后减少失血有关。需要更大规模、精心设计的研究来确定最佳TXA给药策略。证据级别:4级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SA Orthopaedic Journal
SA Orthopaedic Journal Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Fassier technique for correction of proximal femoral deformity in children with osteogenesis imperfecta Factors associated with dissemination and complications of acute bone and joint infections in children Low dislocation rate one year after total hip arthroplasty at a tertiary hospital in South Africa Functional outcome of free fibula grafting in benign non-reconstructable bone tumours involving the hand A survey on the educational value of an mHealth referral app for orthopaedics in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1