A survey on the educational value of an mHealth referral app for orthopaedics in South Africa

Ntambue Kauta, E. Owolabi, B. Salence, Stefan Swanepoel, S. Roche, K. Chu
{"title":"A survey on the educational value of an mHealth referral app for orthopaedics in South Africa","authors":"Ntambue Kauta, E. Owolabi, B. Salence, Stefan Swanepoel, S. Roche, K. Chu","doi":"10.17159/2309-8309/2023/v22n1a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: A WhatsApp orthopaedic referral group (ORG) was created in 2017 by orthopaedic specialists at a district hospital to provide support to primary healthcare doctors in order to manage traumatic fractures and dislocations. This study assessed the educational value and user satisfaction of the ORG platform METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey was conducted among ORG users from May to June 2021. Demographic information, user satisfaction, the educational value of ORG, and perceived improvement in managing closed fractures and dislocations were captured using descriptive and inferential statistics RESULTS: There were 80 respondents, with 50% females. The median age was 30 (interquartile range [IQR] 28-35) years, duration of practice was 5 (IQR 3-10) years, and length of ORG use was 10 (IQR 5-24) months. Seventy-two (90%) reported that ORG enabled them to receive timely advice for orthopaedic case management and 75 (93.8%) considered it an easy referral facilitation tool. Most (76.3%) felt that the advice, pictures, and videos shared on ORG helped novice doctors successfully complete fracture reduction. The percentage of participants who felt very capable in managing the following fractures increased after ORG membership: extra-articular distal radius fracture (12.5% to 45.0%, p < 0.001); bimalleolar ankle fractures (16.3% to 43.8%, p < 0.001) and shoulder dislocation (35.0% to 61.3%, p = 0.001 CONCLUSION: ORG is an easy-to-use and well-accepted platform for the management, referral facilitation and teaching of acute orthopaedic conditions. Similar platforms can be introduced in other settings where surgical specialists are scarce. Additional studies should measure the feasibility and effectiveness of these mHealth platforms Level of evidence: Level 3","PeriodicalId":32220,"journal":{"name":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8309/2023/v22n1a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A WhatsApp orthopaedic referral group (ORG) was created in 2017 by orthopaedic specialists at a district hospital to provide support to primary healthcare doctors in order to manage traumatic fractures and dislocations. This study assessed the educational value and user satisfaction of the ORG platform METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey was conducted among ORG users from May to June 2021. Demographic information, user satisfaction, the educational value of ORG, and perceived improvement in managing closed fractures and dislocations were captured using descriptive and inferential statistics RESULTS: There were 80 respondents, with 50% females. The median age was 30 (interquartile range [IQR] 28-35) years, duration of practice was 5 (IQR 3-10) years, and length of ORG use was 10 (IQR 5-24) months. Seventy-two (90%) reported that ORG enabled them to receive timely advice for orthopaedic case management and 75 (93.8%) considered it an easy referral facilitation tool. Most (76.3%) felt that the advice, pictures, and videos shared on ORG helped novice doctors successfully complete fracture reduction. The percentage of participants who felt very capable in managing the following fractures increased after ORG membership: extra-articular distal radius fracture (12.5% to 45.0%, p < 0.001); bimalleolar ankle fractures (16.3% to 43.8%, p < 0.001) and shoulder dislocation (35.0% to 61.3%, p = 0.001 CONCLUSION: ORG is an easy-to-use and well-accepted platform for the management, referral facilitation and teaching of acute orthopaedic conditions. Similar platforms can be introduced in other settings where surgical specialists are scarce. Additional studies should measure the feasibility and effectiveness of these mHealth platforms Level of evidence: Level 3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项关于南非整形外科的移动健康转诊应用程序的教育价值的调查
背景:一家地区医院的骨科专家于2017年创建了WhatsApp骨科转诊组(ORG),为初级保健医生提供支持,以管理创伤性骨折和脱位。本研究评估了ORG平台的教育价值和用户满意度。方法:在2021年5月至6月期间,对ORG用户进行了在线横断面调查。使用描述性和推断性统计捕获了人口统计信息、用户满意度、ORG的教育价值以及治疗闭合性骨折和脱位的感知改善。结果:共有80名受访者,其中50%为女性。年龄中位数为30岁(四分位间距[IQR] 28 ~ 35)岁,实践时间为5年(IQR 3 ~ 10)年,ORG使用时间为10个月(IQR 5 ~ 24)个月。72人(90%)报告说,ORG使他们能够及时获得骨科病例管理的建议,75人(93.8%)认为它是一个简单的转诊便利工具。大多数(76.3%)认为在ORG上分享的建议、图片和视频帮助新手医生成功完成骨折复位。加入ORG后,认为有能力处理以下骨折的参与者比例增加:关节外桡骨远端骨折(12.5%至45.0%,p < 0.001);结论:ORG是一种易于使用且被广泛接受的平台,可用于急性骨科疾病的管理、转诊促进和教学。类似的平台可以引入到其他缺乏外科专家的地方。进一步的研究应衡量这些移动医疗平台的可行性和有效性证据水平:3级
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SA Orthopaedic Journal
SA Orthopaedic Journal Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Fassier technique for correction of proximal femoral deformity in children with osteogenesis imperfecta Factors associated with dissemination and complications of acute bone and joint infections in children Low dislocation rate one year after total hip arthroplasty at a tertiary hospital in South Africa Functional outcome of free fibula grafting in benign non-reconstructable bone tumours involving the hand A survey on the educational value of an mHealth referral app for orthopaedics in South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1