Voting Intersections: Race, Class, and Participation in Presidential Elections in the United States 2008–2016

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Sociological Perspectives Pub Date : 2021-12-09 DOI:10.1177/07311214211059136
Daniel Laurison, H. Brown, Ankita Rastogi
{"title":"Voting Intersections: Race, Class, and Participation in Presidential Elections in the United States 2008–2016","authors":"Daniel Laurison, H. Brown, Ankita Rastogi","doi":"10.1177/07311214211059136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intersectional analyses are increasingly common in sociology; however, analyses of voting tend to focus on only race, class, or gender, using the others as control variables. We assess whether and how race, class, and gender intersect to produce distinct patterns of voter engagement in presidential elections 2008–2016. Per existing research, we find income strongly predicts White voting. However, the class gap in voting is not statistically significant among Black voters. In contrast to common characterizations of Black people as politically disengaged, lower income Black citizens are more likely to vote than their White counterparts. Moreover, the lowest earning Black women vote at dramatically higher rates than any other race-gender combination in this income group. These findings call into question the perceived universality of the income gap in voting and widespread claims that more resources directly facilitate voting. They also have implications for our understanding of political participation, social inequality, and democratic citizenship.","PeriodicalId":47781,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214211059136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Intersectional analyses are increasingly common in sociology; however, analyses of voting tend to focus on only race, class, or gender, using the others as control variables. We assess whether and how race, class, and gender intersect to produce distinct patterns of voter engagement in presidential elections 2008–2016. Per existing research, we find income strongly predicts White voting. However, the class gap in voting is not statistically significant among Black voters. In contrast to common characterizations of Black people as politically disengaged, lower income Black citizens are more likely to vote than their White counterparts. Moreover, the lowest earning Black women vote at dramatically higher rates than any other race-gender combination in this income group. These findings call into question the perceived universality of the income gap in voting and widespread claims that more resources directly facilitate voting. They also have implications for our understanding of political participation, social inequality, and democratic citizenship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投票交叉点:2008-2016年美国总统选举中的种族、阶级和参与
交叉分析在社会学中越来越普遍;然而,对投票的分析往往只关注种族、阶级或性别,将其他因素作为控制变量。我们评估种族、阶级和性别是否以及如何交叉,以在2008-2016年总统选举中产生不同的选民参与模式。根据现有研究,我们发现收入对白人投票有很强的预测作用。然而,黑人选民在投票方面的阶级差距在统计上并不显著。与人们普遍认为黑人在政治上不参与相反,低收入的黑人公民比白人公民更有可能投票。此外,收入最低的黑人女性的投票率远远高于该收入群体中的任何其他种族性别组合。这些发现对投票中收入差距的普遍性以及更多资源直接促进投票的广泛说法提出了质疑。它们对我们理解政治参与、社会不平等和民主公民身份也有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Established in 1957 and heralded as "always intriguing" by one critic, Sociological Perspectives is well edited and intensely peer-reviewed. Each issue of Sociological Perspectives offers 170 pages of pertinent and up-to-the-minute articles within the field of sociology. Articles typically address the ever-expanding body of knowledge about social processes and are related to economic, political, anthropological and historical issues.
期刊最新文献
Time as a Resource for Constructing Long-term Visions among Two Generations of Feminist Activism in Peru and Ecuador “What Else Explains This Trauma but Porn?” Women Partners of Porn Addicts as Claims-Makers “I Could Feel His Sadness and Disdain as He Told Me”: A Qualitative Analysis of Black Women’s Accounts of Vicarious Racism Schooled Families: Higher Education and Family Virtue The Structure of Social Capital and Cultural Participation: A Cross-sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1