VALIDATION OF THE FINNISH VERSION OF THE MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT TEST1

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Acta Neuropsychologica Pub Date : 2018-12-18 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0012.7964
Taija Nortunen, J. Puustinen, L. Luostarinen, H. Huhtala, T. Hänninen
{"title":"VALIDATION OF THE FINNISH VERSION OF THE MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT TEST1","authors":"Taija Nortunen, J. Puustinen, L. Luostarinen, H. Huhtala, T. Hänninen","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0012.7964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to determine the clinical utility of the Finnish version of the MoCA test for screening Alzheimer’s disease and MCI. The purpose was to examine the ability (sensitivity and specificity) of the MoCA to distinguish patients with AD and MCI from cognitively normal controls.\n\nThe study population consists of three participant groups: patients with AD (n=25), patients meeting the criteria for MCI (n=18), and cognitively normal controls (NC) (n=39). The AD group consists of subjects with very mild (CDR= 0.5, n=12), mild (CDR=1, n=12), and moderate (CDR=2, n=1) dementia, and they were given a diagnosis of dementia by using the revised NINCDS-ARDRA criteria. The normal control group (NC) consists of 39 cognitively normal volunteer participants.\n\nThe three study groups differed from each other in terms of sex, age, and level of education. The NCs were younger than the subjects with AD (t [37,374] = 3.265, p = 0.002) and MCI (t [30,800] = 4.306, p = < 0.001). The NCs were also better-educated than the patients with AD (t [54,975] = -3.419, p = 0.001) and MCI (t [40,782] = -3.008, p = 0.004). The sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA in detecting AD and MCI was done according to various cutoff points. With a cutoff score of 26, the MoCA had a sensitivity of 100% to detect subjects with AD and a sensitivity of 100% to detect subjects with MCI. The specificity was 79.5%. With a cutoff score of 24, which was the best threshold in the present study, the MoCA not only had a high sensitivity to detect subjects with AD (96%) and MCI (89%) but also delivered a high specificity (97%).\n\nThe MoCA has a high sensitivity and specificity to detect subjects with AD and MCI with a cutoff score of 24/30. The Finnish version of the MoCA is a feasible screening instrument for assessing cognitive decline. According to our study, the optimal cutoff score of the MoCA is 24/30.\n\n","PeriodicalId":43280,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0012.7964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical utility of the Finnish version of the MoCA test for screening Alzheimer’s disease and MCI. The purpose was to examine the ability (sensitivity and specificity) of the MoCA to distinguish patients with AD and MCI from cognitively normal controls. The study population consists of three participant groups: patients with AD (n=25), patients meeting the criteria for MCI (n=18), and cognitively normal controls (NC) (n=39). The AD group consists of subjects with very mild (CDR= 0.5, n=12), mild (CDR=1, n=12), and moderate (CDR=2, n=1) dementia, and they were given a diagnosis of dementia by using the revised NINCDS-ARDRA criteria. The normal control group (NC) consists of 39 cognitively normal volunteer participants. The three study groups differed from each other in terms of sex, age, and level of education. The NCs were younger than the subjects with AD (t [37,374] = 3.265, p = 0.002) and MCI (t [30,800] = 4.306, p = < 0.001). The NCs were also better-educated than the patients with AD (t [54,975] = -3.419, p = 0.001) and MCI (t [40,782] = -3.008, p = 0.004). The sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA in detecting AD and MCI was done according to various cutoff points. With a cutoff score of 26, the MoCA had a sensitivity of 100% to detect subjects with AD and a sensitivity of 100% to detect subjects with MCI. The specificity was 79.5%. With a cutoff score of 24, which was the best threshold in the present study, the MoCA not only had a high sensitivity to detect subjects with AD (96%) and MCI (89%) but also delivered a high specificity (97%). The MoCA has a high sensitivity and specificity to detect subjects with AD and MCI with a cutoff score of 24/30. The Finnish version of the MoCA is a feasible screening instrument for assessing cognitive decline. According to our study, the optimal cutoff score of the MoCA is 24/30.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰版蒙特利尔认知评估测验的验证
本研究的目的是确定芬兰版MoCA测试在筛查阿尔茨海默病和MCI方面的临床实用性。目的是检查MoCA区分AD和MCI患者与认知正常对照组的能力(敏感性和特异性)。研究人群由三个参与者组组成:AD患者(n=25)、符合MCI标准的患者(n=18)和认知正常对照组(NC)(n=39)。AD组由患有极轻度(CDR=0.5,n=12)、轻度(CDR=1,n=12,和中度(CDR=2,n=1)痴呆的受试者组成,他们通过使用修订的NINCDS-ARDRA标准被诊断为痴呆。正常对照组(NC)由39名认知正常的志愿者组成。三个研究组在性别、年龄和教育水平方面各不相同。NCs比AD(t[337374]=3.265,p=0.002)和MCI(t[30800]=4.306,p=0.001)受试者更年轻。NCs也比AD(t[554975]=-3.419,p=0.001。MoCA检测AD受试者的灵敏度为100%,MCI受试者检测灵敏度为100%。特异性为79.5%。MoCA的截止分数为24,这是本研究中的最佳阈值,它不仅对检测AD和MCI受试者具有高灵敏度(96%)和高特异度(89%),而且还提供了高特异性(97%)。MoCA在检测AD和MCA受试者时具有高灵敏度和特异性,截止分数为24/30。芬兰版的MoCA是评估认知能力下降的一种可行的筛查工具。根据我们的研究,MoCA的最佳截止分数是24/30。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
42.90%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF REHABILITATION OFFERED ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT THERAPEUTIC PROTOCOLS IN REDUCING CHRONIC FRONTAL SYNDROME IN PATIENTS 10-YEARS FOLLOWING NEUROSURGERY FOR POST-TRAUMATIC INTRACEREBRAL HEMATOMA Empathy as a determinant of perceived stress and styles of coping with stress in medical, law and psychology students NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF COVID-19: CURRENT APPROACH AND CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FACTORS ASSOCIATED TO BURN-OUT AMONG IBN SINA HOSPITAL PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in terms of psychosomatic effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1