{"title":"Developing a service evaluation index for Internet addiction through the Delphi method","authors":"Jongserl Chun, H. Lee","doi":"10.1080/14623730.2017.1345686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study was conducted to develop a service evaluation index for Internet addiction through expert consensus using the Delphi method in South Korea. The study contained three rounds: we drafted the index in the first round by reviewing the existing literature and seeking expert advice, and in rounds two and three, we consulted 12 experts via an online survey to gather their opinions on the appropriateness, clarity, and applicability of the drafted index. In rounds two and three, we collected more-detailed opinions based on the results of earlier rounds. Content validity was high, and it increased during the later rounds of the Delphi study. The Internet addiction service evaluation index that resulted comprised four categories: prevention, treatment, aftercare, and service outcomes. The prevention section contains 17 sub-indices, including preventive education, a screening test and intensive prevention programs, and service promotion. The treatment section contains 15 sub-indices that evaluate diagnosis, planning, and treatment services. The aftercare section uses two sub-indices to assess whether a systematic aftercare is provided. The service outcome section includes 19 sub-indices that evaluate service effectiveness, diagnosis of comorbid conditions, and risk factors. This index could effectively standardize services, facilitate operations, and promote objective evaluation within related service delivery systems.","PeriodicalId":45767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mental Health Promotion","volume":"19 1","pages":"224 - 238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14623730.2017.1345686","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mental Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623730.2017.1345686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Abstract This study was conducted to develop a service evaluation index for Internet addiction through expert consensus using the Delphi method in South Korea. The study contained three rounds: we drafted the index in the first round by reviewing the existing literature and seeking expert advice, and in rounds two and three, we consulted 12 experts via an online survey to gather their opinions on the appropriateness, clarity, and applicability of the drafted index. In rounds two and three, we collected more-detailed opinions based on the results of earlier rounds. Content validity was high, and it increased during the later rounds of the Delphi study. The Internet addiction service evaluation index that resulted comprised four categories: prevention, treatment, aftercare, and service outcomes. The prevention section contains 17 sub-indices, including preventive education, a screening test and intensive prevention programs, and service promotion. The treatment section contains 15 sub-indices that evaluate diagnosis, planning, and treatment services. The aftercare section uses two sub-indices to assess whether a systematic aftercare is provided. The service outcome section includes 19 sub-indices that evaluate service effectiveness, diagnosis of comorbid conditions, and risk factors. This index could effectively standardize services, facilitate operations, and promote objective evaluation within related service delivery systems.
期刊介绍:
This title has ceased (2018). The first journal of its kind in the field, IJMHP publishes materials of distinction, making it essential reading for those with a professional or personal interest in mental health promotion. IJMHP co-ordinates the dissemination of new research outcomes to all those involved in policy making and the implementation of mental health promotion and mental disorder prevention policies. This makes it indispensable to clinical/medical staff, health services researchers, managers, health promoters, educationalists, sociologists, health economists and practitioners from all branches of health and social care, publishing materials by and for all these communities. IJMHP is an official publication of the Clifford Beers Foundation, who work to promote mental health and prevent mental disorders through dissemination of knowledge, training partnerships and consultation. The journal is peer reviewed by an expert international board and acts as a comprehensive information resource designed to increase awareness, foster understanding and promote collaboration between the different disciplines engaged in this diverse activity of study.