Barriers to reading in higher education: Rethinking reading support

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa Pub Date : 2019-09-30 DOI:10.4102/rw.v10i1.241
Kristien Andrianatos
{"title":"Barriers to reading in higher education: Rethinking reading support","authors":"Kristien Andrianatos","doi":"10.4102/rw.v10i1.241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Reading is a functional academic literacy ability needed by students in higher education. In the South African context, inadequate reading ability is one of the reasons for high undergraduate attrition rates. It seems that role players within this sector are of the opinion that students have reading ‘problems’ that need to be ‘fixed’, often by generic reading courses. This article differs from the perception of reading ‘problems’, as reading is viewed from a lifespan developmental perspective. According to this perspective undergraduate students do not have reading ‘problems’ but experience reading barriers hindering their reading development and in effect their academic literacy. Objectives: This study aimed to uncover some of these barriers by means of an empirical study conducted at the North-West University (NWU). Method: The setting of this study was the Potchefstroom campus of the NWU. A qualitative methodology was chosen whereby 14 individual interviews and 7 focus group interviews were used. The purpose of these interviews was to better understand lecturers’ and students’ perceptions about the variables of the reading process, namely the reading ability of the reader, the text to be read, the task, and the socio-cultural context. Results: Lecturers and students perceived a number of reading barriers within each variable, namely students’ non-compliance and lack of abilities, elements of the textbook and availability of lecturer notes, the format of the task, throughput pressures, and lecturers’ assumptions. Conclusion: Knowledge of these barriers and knowledge of the interconnectedness of the reading process could enable role players to collaboratively rethink undergraduate reading support, in which the lecturer has a crucial role to play.","PeriodicalId":42041,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/rw.v10i1.241","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v10i1.241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Reading is a functional academic literacy ability needed by students in higher education. In the South African context, inadequate reading ability is one of the reasons for high undergraduate attrition rates. It seems that role players within this sector are of the opinion that students have reading ‘problems’ that need to be ‘fixed’, often by generic reading courses. This article differs from the perception of reading ‘problems’, as reading is viewed from a lifespan developmental perspective. According to this perspective undergraduate students do not have reading ‘problems’ but experience reading barriers hindering their reading development and in effect their academic literacy. Objectives: This study aimed to uncover some of these barriers by means of an empirical study conducted at the North-West University (NWU). Method: The setting of this study was the Potchefstroom campus of the NWU. A qualitative methodology was chosen whereby 14 individual interviews and 7 focus group interviews were used. The purpose of these interviews was to better understand lecturers’ and students’ perceptions about the variables of the reading process, namely the reading ability of the reader, the text to be read, the task, and the socio-cultural context. Results: Lecturers and students perceived a number of reading barriers within each variable, namely students’ non-compliance and lack of abilities, elements of the textbook and availability of lecturer notes, the format of the task, throughput pressures, and lecturers’ assumptions. Conclusion: Knowledge of these barriers and knowledge of the interconnectedness of the reading process could enable role players to collaboratively rethink undergraduate reading support, in which the lecturer has a crucial role to play.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育中阅读障碍:重新思考阅读支持
背景:阅读是高等教育学生所需要的一种功能性学术素养能力。在南非,阅读能力不足是大学生高流失率的原因之一。这一领域的角色参与者似乎认为,学生们有阅读“问题”,需要通过一般的阅读课程来“解决”。这篇文章不同于阅读“问题”的看法,因为阅读是从生命发展的角度来看的。根据这一观点,大学生并没有阅读“问题”,但他们的阅读障碍阻碍了他们的阅读发展,实际上影响了他们的学术素养。目的:本研究旨在通过在西北大学(NWU)进行的一项实证研究来揭示其中的一些障碍。方法:本研究的背景是NWU的Potchefstroom校区。选择了定性方法,其中使用了14个个人访谈和7个焦点小组访谈。这些访谈的目的是为了更好地了解教师和学生对阅读过程变量的看法,即读者的阅读能力、要阅读的文本、任务和社会文化背景。结果:教师和学生在每个变量中都感知到一些阅读障碍,即学生的不服从和缺乏能力、教科书的要素和讲师笔记的可用性、任务的格式、吞吐量压力和讲师的假设。结论:对这些障碍的了解和对阅读过程的相互联系的了解可以使角色参与者协同重新思考本科阅读支持,其中讲师扮演着至关重要的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intermediate Phase learner performance in English: A quantitative analysis What are we really teaching? The implications of including phonics instruction in Group Guided Reading Using role play and explicit strategy instruction to improve first-year students’ academic reading proficiency Tracing the usage of the term ‘culture of reading’ in South Africa: A review of national government discourse (2000–2019) Improving higher-order comprehension skills of Grade 3 learners in a second language at a quintile 2 school, in Cape Town, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1