Tracing the usage of the term ‘culture of reading’ in South Africa: A review of national government discourse (2000–2019)

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa Pub Date : 2021-09-29 DOI:10.4102/rw.v12i1.314
Claire Biesman-Simons
{"title":"Tracing the usage of the term ‘culture of reading’ in South Africa: A review of national government discourse (2000–2019)","authors":"Claire Biesman-Simons","doi":"10.4102/rw.v12i1.314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: South Africa’s long-standing reading crisis is well recognised. At various stages since 2000, national government has presented the inculcation of a culture of reading as a solution to this crisis.Objectives: This article critically interrogated the term ‘culture of reading’ as used in national government discourse with reference to basic education. By tracing the patterns of use of the term since 2000, it aimed to show the shifts and continuities in the government’s understanding of the term ‘culture of reading’ and how this has shaped the reading landscape.Method: Drawn from a corpus of 331 texts, a sample of 58 texts produced by national government was analysed. Employing discourse and thematic analysis, key themes were extrapolated and their relation to reading within South Africa was explored.Results: The government’s call for a culture of reading occurs predominantly in response to poor literacy results and at launches of campaigns and strategies focused on addressing these results. This occurs repeatedly without clear delineation of the term or justification for recycling failed initiatives. Instead, the term acts as a rhetorical tool to obfuscate the unsuccessful implementation of reading programmes.Conclusion: The government’s failure to clarify what constitutes a culture of reading prohibits a clear picture of its understanding of the term. The frequency with which ‘culture of reading’ is promoted indicates a failure to consider alternative approaches to addressing the reading crisis.Contribution: This article highlights the need for government to re-evaluate its response to the reading crisis, taking cognisance of the South African context.","PeriodicalId":42041,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing-Journal of the Reading Association of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v12i1.314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: South Africa’s long-standing reading crisis is well recognised. At various stages since 2000, national government has presented the inculcation of a culture of reading as a solution to this crisis.Objectives: This article critically interrogated the term ‘culture of reading’ as used in national government discourse with reference to basic education. By tracing the patterns of use of the term since 2000, it aimed to show the shifts and continuities in the government’s understanding of the term ‘culture of reading’ and how this has shaped the reading landscape.Method: Drawn from a corpus of 331 texts, a sample of 58 texts produced by national government was analysed. Employing discourse and thematic analysis, key themes were extrapolated and their relation to reading within South Africa was explored.Results: The government’s call for a culture of reading occurs predominantly in response to poor literacy results and at launches of campaigns and strategies focused on addressing these results. This occurs repeatedly without clear delineation of the term or justification for recycling failed initiatives. Instead, the term acts as a rhetorical tool to obfuscate the unsuccessful implementation of reading programmes.Conclusion: The government’s failure to clarify what constitutes a culture of reading prohibits a clear picture of its understanding of the term. The frequency with which ‘culture of reading’ is promoted indicates a failure to consider alternative approaches to addressing the reading crisis.Contribution: This article highlights the need for government to re-evaluate its response to the reading crisis, taking cognisance of the South African context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
追踪“阅读文化”一词在南非的使用:国家政府话语综述(2000-2009)
背景:南非长期存在的阅读危机得到了广泛认可。自2000年以来,在各个阶段,国家政府都提出了灌输阅读文化来解决这场危机。目的:本文批判性地质疑了国家政府话语中关于基础教育的“阅读文化”一词。通过追踪自2000年以来该术语的使用模式,它旨在展示政府对“阅读文化”一词的理解的转变和持续性,以及这是如何塑造阅读景观的。方法:从331篇文献中抽取58篇国家政府文献进行分析。通过话语和主题分析,推断了关键主题,并探讨了它们与南非阅读的关系。结果:政府对阅读文化的呼吁主要是针对识字率低的结果,以及针对这些结果发起的运动和战略。这种情况反复发生,没有明确界定回收失败举措的术语或理由。相反,这个词充当了一种修辞工具,混淆了阅读计划的不成功实施。结论:政府未能澄清什么是阅读文化,这阻碍了它对这个词的清晰理解。“阅读文化”的推广频率表明,未能考虑解决阅读危机的替代方法。贡献:这篇文章强调了政府有必要重新评估其对阅读危机的反应,并认识到南非的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intermediate Phase learner performance in English: A quantitative analysis What are we really teaching? The implications of including phonics instruction in Group Guided Reading Using role play and explicit strategy instruction to improve first-year students’ academic reading proficiency Tracing the usage of the term ‘culture of reading’ in South Africa: A review of national government discourse (2000–2019) Improving higher-order comprehension skills of Grade 3 learners in a second language at a quintile 2 school, in Cape Town, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1