Soil sampling depth impact on phosphorus yield response prediction in winter wheat

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agricultural & Environmental Letters Pub Date : 2022-03-02 DOI:10.1002/ael2.20067
Vaughn Reed, Bronc Finch, Joao Souza, Patrick Watkins, Brian Arnall
{"title":"Soil sampling depth impact on phosphorus yield response prediction in winter wheat","authors":"Vaughn Reed,&nbsp;Bronc Finch,&nbsp;Joao Souza,&nbsp;Patrick Watkins,&nbsp;Brian Arnall","doi":"10.1002/ael2.20067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Nutrient stratification of no-till managed soil can affect soil test analysis levels of plant-available phosphorus (P). Research has suggested sampling to different depths due to soil acidity, but little work has been conducted to investigate any change to sampling recommendations for immobile nutrients. The objective of this study was to determine the soil sampling depth that had the greatest relationship with yield response to fertilizer-P. The depths sampled in this study were 0–5, 0–10, 0–15, 10–30, 5–10, 5–15, 10–15, and 15–30 cm. The results indicated that the top 15 cm of a soil profile had the greatest amount of Mehlich 3 extractable P (M3P) available and that the 5-to-10 and 5-to-15-cm depths had the highest correlation with relative yield. Soil depths outside of the proposed root zone of winter wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) (15–30 cm) had the lowest correlation with yield response.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.20067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.20067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nutrient stratification of no-till managed soil can affect soil test analysis levels of plant-available phosphorus (P). Research has suggested sampling to different depths due to soil acidity, but little work has been conducted to investigate any change to sampling recommendations for immobile nutrients. The objective of this study was to determine the soil sampling depth that had the greatest relationship with yield response to fertilizer-P. The depths sampled in this study were 0–5, 0–10, 0–15, 10–30, 5–10, 5–15, 10–15, and 15–30 cm. The results indicated that the top 15 cm of a soil profile had the greatest amount of Mehlich 3 extractable P (M3P) available and that the 5-to-10 and 5-to-15-cm depths had the highest correlation with relative yield. Soil depths outside of the proposed root zone of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (15–30 cm) had the lowest correlation with yield response.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤取样深度对冬小麦磷产量响应预测的影响
免耕管理土壤的养分分层会影响植物有效磷(P)的土壤测试分析水平。研究表明,由于土壤酸度的不同,采样深度不同,但很少有研究对固定养分采样建议的任何变化进行调查。本研究的目的是确定土壤取样深度与肥磷产量响应关系最大。本次研究取样深度为0-5、0-10、0-15、10-30、5-10、5-15、10-15和15-30 cm。结果表明,土壤剖面顶部15 cm的Mehlich 3可提取磷(M3P)含量最高,5 ~ 10 cm和5 ~ 15 cm深度与相对产量的相关性最高。冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)拟根区以外土壤深度(15 ~ 30 cm)与产量响应的相关性最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
The influence of climate on varietal similarities across countries Our connections to soil health through simile When are you measuring soil β-glucosidase activities in cropping systems? Soil organic matter characteristics of four soil types under different conservation strategies across Hubei Province A tool for integrating agrometeorological observation data for digital agriculture: A Minnesota case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1