Theorizing Early Literacy in the Public Library

IF 0.3 4区 管理学 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Trends Pub Date : 2022-01-15 DOI:10.1353/lib.2021.0023
Tess Prendergast, Karen Sharkey
{"title":"Theorizing Early Literacy in the Public Library","authors":"Tess Prendergast, Karen Sharkey","doi":"10.1353/lib.2021.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Early literacy resource provision represents a significant aspect of public library services for children and their families. However, research in this area of librarianship, although growing, has not kept pace. In this paper, two veteran children’s librarians, who are now both emerging early literacy scholars, collaborate on a reexamination of a small segment of existing data in order to demonstrate the affordances of returning to data with another theoretical lens, and doing what they refer to as an “alternate reading.” By tracing the findings that emerge from both of their theoretical lenses, specifically, Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological systems theory and Brandt and Clinton’s literacy-in-action, the authors demonstrate the strengths of such collaborations with their chosen theories. They show that using these two different theoretical lenses on the same data allows for other possible meanings to emerge and reveals other threads to follow. These alternate readings lead to deeper understandings of the data and point to other potential areas of research. In an under-studied field such as early literacy in libraries, the authors believe this dual-lens approach to data analysis may inspire other researchers to draw on disparate theories when studying early literacy in public libraries.","PeriodicalId":47175,"journal":{"name":"Library Trends","volume":"70 1","pages":"239 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Trends","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2021.0023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract:Early literacy resource provision represents a significant aspect of public library services for children and their families. However, research in this area of librarianship, although growing, has not kept pace. In this paper, two veteran children’s librarians, who are now both emerging early literacy scholars, collaborate on a reexamination of a small segment of existing data in order to demonstrate the affordances of returning to data with another theoretical lens, and doing what they refer to as an “alternate reading.” By tracing the findings that emerge from both of their theoretical lenses, specifically, Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological systems theory and Brandt and Clinton’s literacy-in-action, the authors demonstrate the strengths of such collaborations with their chosen theories. They show that using these two different theoretical lenses on the same data allows for other possible meanings to emerge and reveals other threads to follow. These alternate readings lead to deeper understandings of the data and point to other potential areas of research. In an under-studied field such as early literacy in libraries, the authors believe this dual-lens approach to data analysis may inspire other researchers to draw on disparate theories when studying early literacy in public libraries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共图书馆早期读写理论化
摘要:提供早期识字资源是公共图书馆为儿童及其家庭提供服务的一个重要方面。然而,图书馆学这一领域的研究虽然在增长,但并没有跟上步伐。在这篇论文中,两位经验丰富的儿童图书馆员,他们现在都是新兴的早期识字学者,合作重新审视了一小部分现有数据,以证明用另一个理论视角回归数据的可供性,并进行他们所说的“交替阅读”,特别是,Bronfenbrenner的生物生态系统理论以及Brandt和Clinton的识字实践,作者们用他们选择的理论展示了这种合作的优势。他们表明,在同一数据上使用这两种不同的理论视角可以产生其他可能的含义,并揭示其他线索。这些交替阅读可以加深对数据的理解,并指出其他潜在的研究领域。在图书馆早期识字等研究不足的领域,作者认为,这种双视角的数据分析方法可能会激励其他研究人员在研究公共图书馆早期识字时借鉴不同的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Surveys, their Kinds and Purposes
IF 56.9 1区 综合性期刊SciencePub Date : 1889-04-19 DOI: 10.1126/science.ns-13.324.307.b
Herbert G. Ogden
来源期刊
Library Trends
Library Trends INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Library Trends, issued quarterly and edited by F. W. Lancaster, explores critical trends in professional librarianship, including practical applications, thorough analyses, and literature reviews. Both practicing librarians and educators use Library Trends as an essential tool in their professional development and continuing education. Each issue is devoted to a single aspect of professional activity or interest. In-depth, thoughtful articles explore important facets of the issue topic. Every year, Library Trends provides breadth, covering a wide variety of themes, from special libraries to emerging technologies. An invaluable resource to practicing librarians and educators, the journal is an important tool that is utilized for professional development and continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Triceps brachii insertional footprint: Under-estimated complexity. Nightmare at MTP: Scar Ectopic. Navigating the Copyright Alternative in Small Claims Enforcement (CASE) Act in an Education and Library Environment Linda C. Smith: Fifty Years of Library and Information Science Education by Design Closing the Loop: Bridging Machine Learning (ML) Research and Library Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1