Povidone-iodine: The “new-old” ally against COVID-19

Alex Castro-Gómez
{"title":"Povidone-iodine: The “new-old” ally against COVID-19","authors":"Alex Castro-Gómez","doi":"10.5554/22562087.E991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has infected over 95 million people worldwide and over 2 million in Colombia. The healthcare personnel (HCP) in our country account for more than 3,800 cases and 197 deaths until January 2021 (1). Being a highly contagious virus, it has changed medical practice and exposed HCP who are at risk of becoming victims with every patient they see. The primary routes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 are through respiratory droplets and contact with infected patients or any nearby surfaces or objects which the patient has used. Airborne transmission of the virus is possible when conducting aerosol generating procedures (2). Among HCP, those who are more exposed to aerosols are more vulnerable to get the disease: anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, internists and intensivists, as well as ENT doctors, ophthalmologists, maxillofacial surgeons, head and neck surgeons, dentists, gastroenterologists, pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, scrub nurses, nursing staff, inter alia. SARS-CoV-2 had a strong affinity for angiotensin II converting enzyme (ACE2) which is mainly present in the nasal and oral mucosae, where it initially replicates before invading the lung (3). The nasalpulmonary axis has been suggested as the route for the development of pneumonia in patients. The saliva is the primary reservoir, with a high viral load of COVID-19 (1.2x108 infectious copies /mL). The virus may be detected in the saliva in 91.7 % of the patients. A key factor to fight the disease is to reduce the viral load in the saliva and nasal secretions, in order to reduce the transmission of the disease; hence, the potential use of povidoneiodine has been suggested (3-5). Since 1800 iodine has been recognized as an effective bactericidal agent. Then povidone-iodine was discovered in 1955, as an ideal and less toxic alternative for surgical asepsis, with a gram-positive, gramnegative, spores, fungal, viral and protozoa germicidal effect. Among the oral antiseptic agents, it has the broadest spectrum to reduce any bacterial, viral or fungal load, and more effective virucidal action than chlorhexidine or benzalkonium chloride (6). Povidone-iodine disrupts the metabolic pathways in the cell wall of microorganisms causing irreversible damage. It is a potent virucidal agent, which inhibits neuraminidase and hemagglutinin, blocking the attachment of the virus to the cell receptors and preventing the release and spread of the virus from the infected cells. Its efficacy has been assessed in similar coronaviruses such as SARS and MERS (7). In vitro studies have shown that it also destroys SARS-CoV-2 when used for gargling or as mouth rinse at 0,23 %, for 15 seconds, reducing the viral activity by 99.99 %. Experimental models have shown that povidone-iodine at a concentration of 1,25 % does not alter the ciliary motility and is well tolerated by the nasal epithelium (8). Povidone-iodine has been well tolerated in the upper airway at a dose range between 1 % to 10 %, with no evidence of thyroid dysfunction, olfactory disorders or changes in mucociliary clearance, even with extended use (9). The lack of solid evidence has prevented WHO and FDA approval of povidone-iodine, specifically for use in SARS CoV-2. A recent Cochrane systematic review failed to find any evidence for the systematic adoption of this intervention; however, it highlights the relatively few publications on the topic (10). Considering the efficacy of povidone-iodine with similar viruses and its routine use for nasal and oral decontamination in surgery, several countries have developed protocols for its use. It may be considered a useful public health intervention and part of the personal protection strategy (11). For HCP, these protocols (Table 1) suggest the routine use of povidone-iodine as nasal drops","PeriodicalId":36529,"journal":{"name":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.E991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has infected over 95 million people worldwide and over 2 million in Colombia. The healthcare personnel (HCP) in our country account for more than 3,800 cases and 197 deaths until January 2021 (1). Being a highly contagious virus, it has changed medical practice and exposed HCP who are at risk of becoming victims with every patient they see. The primary routes of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 are through respiratory droplets and contact with infected patients or any nearby surfaces or objects which the patient has used. Airborne transmission of the virus is possible when conducting aerosol generating procedures (2). Among HCP, those who are more exposed to aerosols are more vulnerable to get the disease: anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, internists and intensivists, as well as ENT doctors, ophthalmologists, maxillofacial surgeons, head and neck surgeons, dentists, gastroenterologists, pulmonologists, respiratory therapists, scrub nurses, nursing staff, inter alia. SARS-CoV-2 had a strong affinity for angiotensin II converting enzyme (ACE2) which is mainly present in the nasal and oral mucosae, where it initially replicates before invading the lung (3). The nasalpulmonary axis has been suggested as the route for the development of pneumonia in patients. The saliva is the primary reservoir, with a high viral load of COVID-19 (1.2x108 infectious copies /mL). The virus may be detected in the saliva in 91.7 % of the patients. A key factor to fight the disease is to reduce the viral load in the saliva and nasal secretions, in order to reduce the transmission of the disease; hence, the potential use of povidoneiodine has been suggested (3-5). Since 1800 iodine has been recognized as an effective bactericidal agent. Then povidone-iodine was discovered in 1955, as an ideal and less toxic alternative for surgical asepsis, with a gram-positive, gramnegative, spores, fungal, viral and protozoa germicidal effect. Among the oral antiseptic agents, it has the broadest spectrum to reduce any bacterial, viral or fungal load, and more effective virucidal action than chlorhexidine or benzalkonium chloride (6). Povidone-iodine disrupts the metabolic pathways in the cell wall of microorganisms causing irreversible damage. It is a potent virucidal agent, which inhibits neuraminidase and hemagglutinin, blocking the attachment of the virus to the cell receptors and preventing the release and spread of the virus from the infected cells. Its efficacy has been assessed in similar coronaviruses such as SARS and MERS (7). In vitro studies have shown that it also destroys SARS-CoV-2 when used for gargling or as mouth rinse at 0,23 %, for 15 seconds, reducing the viral activity by 99.99 %. Experimental models have shown that povidone-iodine at a concentration of 1,25 % does not alter the ciliary motility and is well tolerated by the nasal epithelium (8). Povidone-iodine has been well tolerated in the upper airway at a dose range between 1 % to 10 %, with no evidence of thyroid dysfunction, olfactory disorders or changes in mucociliary clearance, even with extended use (9). The lack of solid evidence has prevented WHO and FDA approval of povidone-iodine, specifically for use in SARS CoV-2. A recent Cochrane systematic review failed to find any evidence for the systematic adoption of this intervention; however, it highlights the relatively few publications on the topic (10). Considering the efficacy of povidone-iodine with similar viruses and its routine use for nasal and oral decontamination in surgery, several countries have developed protocols for its use. It may be considered a useful public health intervention and part of the personal protection strategy (11). For HCP, these protocols (Table 1) suggest the routine use of povidone-iodine as nasal drops
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聚维酮碘:对抗新冠肺炎的“新生”盟友
严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型疫情已在全球感染了9500多万人,在哥伦比亚感染了200多万人。截至2021年1月,我国医护人员的病例超过3800例,死亡197例(1)。作为一种高度传染性的病毒,它改变了医疗实践,暴露了HCP,他们看到的每一个病人都有成为受害者的风险。严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型的主要传播途径是通过呼吸道飞沫和与感染患者或患者使用过的任何附近表面或物体的接触。当进行气溶胶产生程序时,病毒可能通过空气传播(2)。在HCP中,那些更容易接触气溶胶的人更容易感染这种疾病:麻醉师、急诊医生、内科医生和重症监护师,以及耳鼻喉科医生、眼科医生、颌面外科医生、头颈外科医生、牙医、胃肠科医生、肺科医生、呼吸治疗师、擦洗护士、护理人员等。严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型对血管紧张素II转换酶(ACE2)具有很强的亲和力,该酶主要存在于鼻腔和口腔粘膜中,在入侵肺部之前,它最初在那里复制(3)。鼻肺轴被认为是患者发展为肺炎的途径。唾液是主要的蓄水池,新冠肺炎的病毒载量很高(1.2×108感染拷贝数/毫升)。91.7%的患者唾液中可检测到该病毒。对抗疾病的一个关键因素是减少唾液和鼻腔分泌物中的病毒载量,以减少疾病的传播;因此,已经提出了聚维酮碘的潜在用途(3-5)。自1800年以来,碘被认为是一种有效的杀菌剂。1955年,聚维酮碘被发现,是一种理想的、毒性较小的外科无菌替代品,具有革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性、孢子、真菌、病毒和原生动物的杀菌效果。在口腔防腐剂中,它具有最广泛的减少细菌、病毒或真菌载量的作用,并且比氯己定或苯扎氯铵更有效的杀病毒作用(6)。聚维酮碘破坏微生物细胞壁的代谢途径,造成不可逆的损伤。它是一种强效的杀病毒剂,可抑制神经氨酸酶和血凝素,阻断病毒与细胞受体的结合,防止病毒从受感染细胞中释放和传播。它的疗效已在SARS和MERS等类似冠状病毒中进行了评估(7)。体外研究表明,当用于漱口或漱口时,其浓度为0.23%,持续15秒,也会破坏严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型,使病毒活性降低99.99%。实验模型表明,浓度为1.25%的聚维酮碘不会改变纤毛运动,并且鼻上皮耐受性良好(8)。聚维酮碘在上呼吸道的耐受性良好,剂量范围在1%至10%之间,即使长期使用,也没有甲状腺功能障碍、嗅觉障碍或粘液纤毛清除率变化的证据(9)。由于缺乏确凿证据,世界卫生组织和美国食品药品监督管理局无法批准聚维酮碘,特别是用于SARS CoV-2。最近的一项Cochrane系统综述没有发现任何证据表明系统地采用了这种干预措施;然而,它强调了关于这一主题的出版物相对较少(10)。考虑到聚维酮碘与类似病毒的疗效及其在外科手术中用于鼻腔和口腔净化的常规用途,几个国家已经制定了使用该药物的方案。它可以被认为是一种有用的公共卫生干预措施,也是个人保护战略的一部分(11)。对于HCP,这些方案(表1)建议常规使用聚维酮碘作为滴鼻剂
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology
Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The environmental responsibility of modern anesthesiology and perioperative care Características del paro cardiaco extrahospitalario atendido por operadores de ambulancias en Medellín. Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo de base poblacional Shortage of perioperative supplies and drugs: Theory and practical implications Respuesta hemodinámica a dosis subanestésicas de ketamina en dolor posoperatorio: revisión sistemática ChatGPT's learning and reasoning capacity in anesthesiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1