Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in Children

Raihan Uddin, A. Jabbar, Shafiqur Rahman, Maooz Khan
{"title":"Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in Children","authors":"Raihan Uddin, A. Jabbar, Shafiqur Rahman, Maooz Khan","doi":"10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The LMA-ProSeal is a new laryngeal mask airway with a rear cuff and drainage tube that allows a higher seal pressure than the LMA-Classic for the same intra-cuff pressure and it permits drainage of gastric secretions and access to the alimentary tract. Objective: This study compared the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children for ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure and maintenance of airway. Materials and method: This comparative study was done during the period of January 2015 to December 2015 in BIRDEM Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Forty ASA 1-2 children undergoing circumcision, herniotomy and orchiopexy were included. The patients were randomly assigned to size 2.5 LMA-ProSeal or 2.5 LMA-Classic groups for airway management. We assessed success rates at first attempt of insertion, airway sealing pressure, maintenance of airway and postoperative complications. Results: There was no statistical difference between two groups for the success rates at first attempt of insertion and maintenance of airway but sealing pressure was significantly high in the LMA-ProSeal group. Regarding postoperative complication like injury to lip-teeth-tongue, blood staining and cough or laryngospasm were also not significant. Conclusion: We concluded that ease of insertion, maintenance of airway and risk of injury are similar between the LMA-ProSeal and the LMA-Classic in children. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2018 6(1): 18-21","PeriodicalId":53280,"journal":{"name":"Delta Medical College Journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"18-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35963","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delta Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/DMCJ.V6I1.35963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The LMA-ProSeal is a new laryngeal mask airway with a rear cuff and drainage tube that allows a higher seal pressure than the LMA-Classic for the same intra-cuff pressure and it permits drainage of gastric secretions and access to the alimentary tract. Objective: This study compared the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children for ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure and maintenance of airway. Materials and method: This comparative study was done during the period of January 2015 to December 2015 in BIRDEM Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Forty ASA 1-2 children undergoing circumcision, herniotomy and orchiopexy were included. The patients were randomly assigned to size 2.5 LMA-ProSeal or 2.5 LMA-Classic groups for airway management. We assessed success rates at first attempt of insertion, airway sealing pressure, maintenance of airway and postoperative complications. Results: There was no statistical difference between two groups for the success rates at first attempt of insertion and maintenance of airway but sealing pressure was significantly high in the LMA-ProSeal group. Regarding postoperative complication like injury to lip-teeth-tongue, blood staining and cough or laryngospasm were also not significant. Conclusion: We concluded that ease of insertion, maintenance of airway and risk of injury are similar between the LMA-ProSeal and the LMA-Classic in children. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2018 6(1): 18-21
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童LMA-ProSeal与LMA-Classic的比较
背景:LMA ProSeal是一种新型喉罩气道,具有后袖带和引流管,在相同的袖带内压力下,其密封压力比LMA Classic更高,并且可以排出胃分泌物并进入消化道。目的:本研究比较了LMA ProSeal和LMA Classic在儿童中的易插入性、气道密封压力和气道维护方面的作用。材料和方法:本比较研究于2015年1月至2015年12月在孟加拉国达卡的BIRDEM医院进行。40名ASA 1-2儿童接受了包皮环切术、疝修补术和睾丸切除术。患者被随机分配到尺寸为2.5 LMA ProSeal或2.5 LMA Classic组进行气道管理。我们评估了首次插入的成功率、气道密封压力、气道维持和术后并发症。结果:两组首次尝试插入和维持气道的成功率没有统计学差异,但LMA ProSeal组的密封压力显著较高。术后并发症如唇、牙、舌损伤、血染、咳嗽或喉痉挛也不显著。结论:我们得出的结论是,在儿童中,LMA ProSeal和LMA Classic的插入、气道维持和损伤风险相似。德尔塔医学杂志2018年1月6(1):18-21
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment Related Factors Associated with Non-adherence to Anti-Tuberculosis Treatment Role of Adding Topical Metronidazole in the Treatment of Acute Anal Fissure The Role of Transvaginal Ultrasonography in the Evaluation of Postmenopausal Bleeding Comparative Efficacy of Seed Extract of Tamarindus indica and Vitamin E on the Liver Weight of Long Evan’s Rats Intoxicated with Paracetamol Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1