Formal models of opinion formation and their application to real data: evidence from online social networks

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Mathematical Sociology Pub Date : 2020-10-29 DOI:10.1080/0022250X.2020.1835894
I. Kozitsin
{"title":"Formal models of opinion formation and their application to real data: evidence from online social networks","authors":"I. Kozitsin","doi":"10.1080/0022250X.2020.1835894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, we analyze data on the opinion dynamics of 1,660,927 users of an online social network using formal models of opinion formation. We have observed that moderate users have a tendency to follow the average opinion of their online friends, which we interpret as a presence of bounded confidence. Further, we have discovered that the probability of moving toward the average opinion goes down if the difference between it and the user’s opinion is too large. Another interesting feature uncovered is that if a user’s opinion and the average opinion of their online friends are very similar, the influence also decreases.","PeriodicalId":50139,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology","volume":"46 1","pages":"120 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0022250X.2020.1835894","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2020.1835894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, we analyze data on the opinion dynamics of 1,660,927 users of an online social network using formal models of opinion formation. We have observed that moderate users have a tendency to follow the average opinion of their online friends, which we interpret as a presence of bounded confidence. Further, we have discovered that the probability of moving toward the average opinion goes down if the difference between it and the user’s opinion is too large. Another interesting feature uncovered is that if a user’s opinion and the average opinion of their online friends are very similar, the influence also decreases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意见形成的正式模型及其在真实数据中的应用:来自在线社交网络的证据
摘要本文采用意见形成的形式化模型,分析了在线社交网络上1,660,927名用户的意见动态数据。我们观察到,适度的用户倾向于跟随他们在线朋友的平均意见,我们将其解释为有限自信的存在。此外,我们发现,如果平均意见与用户意见之间的差异太大,则倾向于平均意见的概率会下降。另一个有趣的发现是,如果一个用户的观点与其在线朋友的平均观点非常相似,其影响力也会下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Sociology
Journal of Mathematical Sociology 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Mathematical Sociology is to publish models and mathematical techniques that would likely be useful to professional sociologists. The Journal also welcomes papers of mutual interest to social scientists and other social and behavioral scientists, as well as papers by non-social scientists that may encourage fruitful connections between sociology and other disciplines. Reviews of new or developing areas of mathematics and mathematical modeling that may have significant applications in sociology will also be considered. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology is published in association with the International Network for Social Network Analysis, the Japanese Association for Mathematical Sociology, the Mathematical Sociology Section of the American Sociological Association, and the Methodology Section of the American Sociological Association.
期刊最新文献
What Amphibians Can Teach Us About the Evolution of Parental Care. Can altruism lead to a willingness to take risks? Everybody herds, sometimes: cumulative advantage as a product of rational learning Hurdle-QAP models overcome dependency and sparsity in scientific collaboration count networks Latent class analysis of multigroup heterogeneity in propensity for academic dishonesty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1