Social and personal control, legitimacy of authorities, and social cohesion as protective factors of anti-sociality in adolescents

IF 0.2 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Revista CES Psicologia Pub Date : 2022-09-16 DOI:10.21615/cesp.5901
Martha Frías Armenta, Nadia Sarai Corral Frías, Martha Esther Serrano Arias
{"title":"Social and personal control, legitimacy of authorities, and social cohesion as protective factors of anti-sociality in adolescents","authors":"Martha Frías Armenta, Nadia Sarai Corral Frías, Martha Esther Serrano Arias","doi":"10.21615/cesp.5901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law can shape individual and social behavior in different ways including through perceived control and legitimacy of authorities. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether legitimacy of authorities, social and personal control, and social cohesion influence antisocial behaviors in juvenile offenders. The study, included a sample of two hundred juvenile offenders in Mexico, used structural equation modeling to test the relationship between the perception of just treatment by police and judges (i.e., legitimacy) and social and personal control and outcomes of antisocial behaviors and tendencies (self-report and probability of antisocial behavior as well as reports of peer antisocial behavior). Results indicate legitimacy of authorities and personal control had a negative effect while social control showed a positive effect on these behaviors. Social cohesion had a positive effect on social control. Our results suggest that legitimacy of authorities and personal control act as protective factors against antisocial behaviors whereas, contrary to the expected results, social control may be a risk factor. This research highlights the importance of preventative protective efforts in juvenile offenders such as just treatment and development of personal control rather than the use of punitive processes. In this sense, it is important to consider alternatives for judicial involvement and punishment such as community programs as well as cognitive and emotional prevention and intervention efforts to reduce antisocial behaviors. Programs such as the Reasoning and Rehabilitation Program, other cognitive skill interventions as well as developmental prevention programs have shown efficacy.","PeriodicalId":42351,"journal":{"name":"Revista CES Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CES Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21615/cesp.5901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Law can shape individual and social behavior in different ways including through perceived control and legitimacy of authorities. The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether legitimacy of authorities, social and personal control, and social cohesion influence antisocial behaviors in juvenile offenders. The study, included a sample of two hundred juvenile offenders in Mexico, used structural equation modeling to test the relationship between the perception of just treatment by police and judges (i.e., legitimacy) and social and personal control and outcomes of antisocial behaviors and tendencies (self-report and probability of antisocial behavior as well as reports of peer antisocial behavior). Results indicate legitimacy of authorities and personal control had a negative effect while social control showed a positive effect on these behaviors. Social cohesion had a positive effect on social control. Our results suggest that legitimacy of authorities and personal control act as protective factors against antisocial behaviors whereas, contrary to the expected results, social control may be a risk factor. This research highlights the importance of preventative protective efforts in juvenile offenders such as just treatment and development of personal control rather than the use of punitive processes. In this sense, it is important to consider alternatives for judicial involvement and punishment such as community programs as well as cognitive and emotional prevention and intervention efforts to reduce antisocial behaviors. Programs such as the Reasoning and Rehabilitation Program, other cognitive skill interventions as well as developmental prevention programs have shown efficacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会和个人控制、权威的合法性和社会凝聚力是青少年反社会的保护因素
法律可以以不同的方式塑造个人和社会行为,包括通过感知到的权力控制和合法性。本研究的主要目的是调查当局的合法性、社会和个人控制以及社会凝聚力是否会影响青少年罪犯的反社会行为。这项研究包括墨西哥200名青少年罪犯的样本,使用结构方程模型来测试警察和法官对公正待遇的看法(即合法性)与社会和个人控制以及反社会行为和倾向的结果(反社会行为的自我报告和概率以及同伴反社会行为的报告)之间的关系。研究结果表明,权力的合法性和个人控制对这些行为有负面影响,而社会控制则对这些行为产生积极影响。社会凝聚力对社会控制有积极影响。我们的研究结果表明,当局的合法性和个人控制是对抗反社会行为的保护因素,而与预期结果相反,社会控制可能是一个风险因素。这项研究强调了对青少年罪犯进行预防性保护的重要性,例如公正的治疗和发展个人控制,而不是使用惩罚程序。从这个意义上说,重要的是考虑司法参与和惩罚的替代方案,如社区计划,以及认知和情绪预防和干预措施,以减少反社会行为。推理和康复计划、其他认知技能干预以及发展预防计划等项目已显示出效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista CES Psicologia
Revista CES Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Estudio psicométrico de la escala de Afecto Positivo y Negativo para niños y adolescentes (PANAS-N) en población mexicana Satisfaction with life and related sociodemographic variables among bereaved adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study Positive Youth Development in Colombia: Reflections on a Cross-cultural Collaboration Investigación en psicología positiva y su impacto en la comprensión de las capacidades humanas ¿Todos los grupos felices son productivos? Interacción entre el afecto positivo grupal y el desempeño laboral grupal: estudio exploratorio
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1