The potential of misdiagnosis of high IQ youth by practicing mental health professionals: A mixed methods study

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL High Ability Studies Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/13598139.2019.1661223
James C. Bishop, Anne N. Rinn
{"title":"The potential of misdiagnosis of high IQ youth by practicing mental health professionals: A mixed methods study","authors":"James C. Bishop, Anne N. Rinn","doi":"10.1080/13598139.2019.1661223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The difficulty of distinguishing between genuine disorder and characteristics that can be attributed to high IQ increases the likelihood of diagnostic error by mental health practitioners. This mixed methods study explores the possibility of misdiagnosis of high IQ youth by mental health professionals. Participants were private practice mental health professionals (n = 330) who were presented with case study vignettes illustrating high IQ youth exhibiting characteristics associated with their population. Participants then completed a questionnaire and provided an assessment of the hypothetical client. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was utilized to develop a decision tree to predict the likelihood of a diagnosis of disorder being rendered for high IQ youth experiencing behavioral or emotional issues related to their intelligence. We also examined the stated rationale of the participants in arriving at their clinical judgments to determine what themes and commonalities emerged. The study found that, regardless of whether high IQ is suggested as a possible explanation of the presenting issues of a high IQ youth, mental health clinicians still leaned toward some type of diagnosis of disorder (82.9% without suggestion of high IQ vs. 78.4% with suggestion, difference 4.5%). The results of this study provide much-needed empirical exploration of the concern for misdiagnosis of high IQ youth and inform clinical practice and education.","PeriodicalId":46343,"journal":{"name":"High Ability Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"213 - 243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13598139.2019.1661223","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Ability Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1661223","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT The difficulty of distinguishing between genuine disorder and characteristics that can be attributed to high IQ increases the likelihood of diagnostic error by mental health practitioners. This mixed methods study explores the possibility of misdiagnosis of high IQ youth by mental health professionals. Participants were private practice mental health professionals (n = 330) who were presented with case study vignettes illustrating high IQ youth exhibiting characteristics associated with their population. Participants then completed a questionnaire and provided an assessment of the hypothetical client. Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was utilized to develop a decision tree to predict the likelihood of a diagnosis of disorder being rendered for high IQ youth experiencing behavioral or emotional issues related to their intelligence. We also examined the stated rationale of the participants in arriving at their clinical judgments to determine what themes and commonalities emerged. The study found that, regardless of whether high IQ is suggested as a possible explanation of the presenting issues of a high IQ youth, mental health clinicians still leaned toward some type of diagnosis of disorder (82.9% without suggestion of high IQ vs. 78.4% with suggestion, difference 4.5%). The results of this study provide much-needed empirical exploration of the concern for misdiagnosis of high IQ youth and inform clinical practice and education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
执业心理健康专业人员对高智商青年误诊的可能性:一项混合方法研究
摘要区分真正的障碍和可归因于高智商的特征的困难增加了心理健康从业者诊断错误的可能性。这项混合方法研究探讨了心理健康专业人员对高智商青年的误诊可能性。参与者是私人执业的心理健康专业人员(n=330),他们收到了案例研究小插曲,展示了高智商青年表现出与其人群相关的特征。然后,参与者完成了一份问卷,并对假设客户进行了评估。分类和回归树(CART)分析用于开发决策树,以预测经历与其智力相关的行为或情绪问题的高智商青年被诊断为障碍的可能性。我们还检查了参与者在做出临床判断时所陈述的基本原理,以确定出现了哪些主题和共性。研究发现,无论高智商是否被认为是高智商青年表现问题的可能解释,心理健康临床医生仍然倾向于某种类型的疾病诊断(82.9%没有高智商的建议,78.4%有建议,差异4.5%)。本研究的结果为关注高智商青年的误诊提供了急需的实证探索,并为临床实践和教育提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: High Ability Studies provides a forum for scholars in a variety of disciplines associated with the development of human abilities to their highest level. It is a medium for the promotion of high ability, whether through the communication of scientific research, theory, or the exchange of practical experience and ideas. The contents of this journal are unique in reflecting concerns and recent developments in this area from childhood and across the whole life span in a variety of contexts. Far from being restricted to the traditional focus on high-level cognitive development, it also presents investigations into all other areas of human endeavour, including sport, technology, the arts, business, management and social relations.
期刊最新文献
Self-regulated learning while solving mathematical problems among mathematically gifted and talented students’ The relations of social competence and mental well-being by perception of giftedness in gifted students Is it time to retire ‘talent’ from discussions of athlete development? Exploring mental representations of prospective teachers about gifted education using associative group analysis College students with high abilities in liberal arts disciplines: Examining the effect of spirituality in bolstering self-regulated learning, affect balance, peer relationships, and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1