Decentralization and local pollution activities: New quasi evidence from China

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Economics of Transition and Institutional Change Pub Date : 2022-04-11 DOI:10.1111/ecot.12328
Yu Qi, Jinliang Yu
{"title":"Decentralization and local pollution activities: New quasi evidence from China","authors":"Yu Qi,&nbsp;Jinliang Yu","doi":"10.1111/ecot.12328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Traditional fiscal federalism theory holds that decentralization may improve the provision of public goods and services. However, the social welfare field with strong externalities may face different incentives and behavioural logics. This paper provides novel empirical evidence for the causal relationship between decentralization and local pollution. In this paper, we focussed on China's widely spread decentralization reform, which substantially expanded the economic and social management autonomy of county governments. Using the difference-in-differences method and a panel dataset from 1998 to 2007, we found that the reform would compel affected counties to loosen environmental regulation, adopt financial and fiscal policies that would actually support heavy-pollution industries' rapid economic growth. Overall, the reform led to a significant increase in local pollution, thus worsening the overall environmental quality. Moreover, cost-benefit analysis indicated that the reforms generated net gains in social welfare, but the substantial environmental costs cannot be ignored.</p>","PeriodicalId":40265,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","volume":"31 1","pages":"115-159"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transition and Institutional Change","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecot.12328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Traditional fiscal federalism theory holds that decentralization may improve the provision of public goods and services. However, the social welfare field with strong externalities may face different incentives and behavioural logics. This paper provides novel empirical evidence for the causal relationship between decentralization and local pollution. In this paper, we focussed on China's widely spread decentralization reform, which substantially expanded the economic and social management autonomy of county governments. Using the difference-in-differences method and a panel dataset from 1998 to 2007, we found that the reform would compel affected counties to loosen environmental regulation, adopt financial and fiscal policies that would actually support heavy-pollution industries' rapid economic growth. Overall, the reform led to a significant increase in local pollution, thus worsening the overall environmental quality. Moreover, cost-benefit analysis indicated that the reforms generated net gains in social welfare, but the substantial environmental costs cannot be ignored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分权与地方污染活动:来自中国的新准证据
传统的财政联邦制理论认为,分权可以改善公共产品和服务的提供。然而,具有较强外部性的社会福利领域可能面临不同的激励和行为逻辑。本文为地方分权与地方污染之间的因果关系提供了新的实证证据。在本文中,我们关注的是中国广泛推行的简政放权改革,这一改革大大扩大了县政府的经济和社会管理自主权。利用1998 - 2007年的面板数据集和差中差法,我们发现改革将迫使受影响的县放松环境监管,采取实际支持重污染行业经济快速增长的金融和财政政策。总体而言,改革导致当地污染显著增加,从而导致整体环境质量恶化。此外,成本效益分析表明,改革产生了社会福利的净收益,但巨大的环境成本不容忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
An experiment on the stability of business environment perceptions in a firm survey Issue Information Can the improvements in human capital quality mitigate the negative impact of ageing on growth? Evidence from selected EU countries Impact of economic crises on corporate‐banking relationship: Evidence from Korea The dynamics of product and labour market power: Evidence from Lithuania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1