Age reporting for the oldest old in the Brazilian COVID-19 vaccination database: What can we learn from it?

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY Demographic Research Pub Date : 2023-05-19 DOI:10.4054/demres.2023.48.28
C. Turra, F. Fernandes, Júlia Almeida Calazans, M. Nepomuceno
{"title":"Age reporting for the oldest old in the Brazilian COVID-19 vaccination database: What can we learn from it?","authors":"C. Turra, F. Fernandes, Júlia Almeida Calazans, M. Nepomuceno","doi":"10.4054/demres.2023.48.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Age misreporting affects population estimates at older ages. In Brazil, every citizen must be registered and show an identity document to vaccinate against COVID-19. This requirement to present proof of age provides a unique opportunity for measuring the oldest-old population using novel administrative data.OBJECTIVES To offer critically assessed estimates of the Brazilian population aged 80 and older based on data from the vaccination registration system (VRS). To uncover discrepancies between the number of vaccinated oldest-old people and the projections used to estimate target populations for COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS We calculate data quality indicators based on data from the VRS - namely, 100+/80+ and 90+/80+ population proportions, sex ratios, and the Myers blended index - and compare them to those based on data on target populations from Brazilian censuses and demographic projections, and from Sweden - a country with high-quality data. We also estimate vaccination coverage ratios using population projections adjusted to excess deaths as the denominators.RESULTS Requiring documentation reduces age heaping, age exaggeration, and sex ratios marginally. However, it cannot solve the problem of the misreporting of birth dates due to the absence of long-standing birth registration systems in Brazil, particularly in the northern and central regions. In addition, we find a mismatch between the projected populations and numbers of vaccinated people across regions.CONCLUSIONS Despite improvements in data quality in Brazil, we are still not confident about the accuracy of age reporting among the oldest old in the less advantaged Brazilian regions. The postponement of the 2020 census reduced the ability of authorities to define the target populations for vaccinations against COVID-19 and other diseases.CONTRIBUTIONS This is the first study to compare population estimates for the oldest old in administrative data and census data in Brazil. Age misreporting resulted in discrepancies that may have compromised the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign.","PeriodicalId":48242,"journal":{"name":"Demographic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demographic Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2023.48.28","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Age misreporting affects population estimates at older ages. In Brazil, every citizen must be registered and show an identity document to vaccinate against COVID-19. This requirement to present proof of age provides a unique opportunity for measuring the oldest-old population using novel administrative data.OBJECTIVES To offer critically assessed estimates of the Brazilian population aged 80 and older based on data from the vaccination registration system (VRS). To uncover discrepancies between the number of vaccinated oldest-old people and the projections used to estimate target populations for COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS We calculate data quality indicators based on data from the VRS - namely, 100+/80+ and 90+/80+ population proportions, sex ratios, and the Myers blended index - and compare them to those based on data on target populations from Brazilian censuses and demographic projections, and from Sweden - a country with high-quality data. We also estimate vaccination coverage ratios using population projections adjusted to excess deaths as the denominators.RESULTS Requiring documentation reduces age heaping, age exaggeration, and sex ratios marginally. However, it cannot solve the problem of the misreporting of birth dates due to the absence of long-standing birth registration systems in Brazil, particularly in the northern and central regions. In addition, we find a mismatch between the projected populations and numbers of vaccinated people across regions.CONCLUSIONS Despite improvements in data quality in Brazil, we are still not confident about the accuracy of age reporting among the oldest old in the less advantaged Brazilian regions. The postponement of the 2020 census reduced the ability of authorities to define the target populations for vaccinations against COVID-19 and other diseases.CONTRIBUTIONS This is the first study to compare population estimates for the oldest old in administrative data and census data in Brazil. Age misreporting resulted in discrepancies that may have compromised the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西COVID-19疫苗接种数据库中最高龄老人的年龄报告:我们可以从中学到什么?
背景年龄误报影响老年人口估计。在巴西,每位公民都必须登记并出示身份证件才能接种COVID-19疫苗。提供年龄证明的这一要求为使用新的行政数据测量最高龄人口提供了一个独特的机会。目的:根据疫苗接种登记系统(VRS)的数据,对巴西80岁及以上人口进行严格评估。揭示接种疫苗的老年人口数量与用于估计COVID-19疫苗接种目标人群的预测之间的差异。方法我们根据VRS的数据计算数据质量指标,即100+/80+和90+/80+人口比例、性别比例和Myers混合指数,并将其与基于巴西人口普查和人口预测的目标人群数据以及瑞典的数据进行比较。瑞典是一个拥有高质量数据的国家。我们还使用以超额死亡调整后的人口预测作为分母来估计疫苗接种覆盖率。结果:要求提供文件可以略微减少年龄堆积、年龄夸大和性别比。然而,由于巴西,特别是在北部和中部地区缺乏长期存在的出生登记系统,它无法解决谎报出生日期的问题。此外,我们发现预计人口与各地区接种疫苗人数之间存在不匹配。结论:尽管巴西的数据质量有所改善,但我们仍然对巴西贫困地区老年人年龄报告的准确性缺乏信心。2020年人口普查的推迟降低了当局确定COVID-19和其他疾病疫苗接种目标人群的能力。这是第一个比较巴西行政数据和人口普查数据中最高龄人口估计的研究。年龄误报导致的差异可能损害了COVID-19疫苗接种运动的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Demographic Research
Demographic Research DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Demographic Research is a free, online, open access, peer-reviewed journal of the population sciences published by the Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research in Rostock, Germany. The journal pioneers an expedited review system. Contributions can generally be published within one month after final acceptance.
期刊最新文献
How do environmental stressors influence migration? A meta-regression analysis of environmental migration literature Lives saved, lives lost, and under-reported COVID-19 deaths: Excess and non-excess mortality in relation to cause-specific mortality during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden Bayesian implementation of Rogers–Castro model migration schedules: An alternative technique for parameter estimation The formal demography of kinship V: Kin loss, bereavement, and causes of death Programmatic access to open statistical data for population studies: The SDMX standard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1