A New-Institutional Analysis of Inclusion Policy Enactment in Teacher Education: A Case from Ontario

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Pub Date : 2021-03-11 DOI:10.7202/1075670AR
Ayman Massouti
{"title":"A New-Institutional Analysis of Inclusion Policy Enactment in Teacher Education: A Case from Ontario","authors":"Ayman Massouti","doi":"10.7202/1075670AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative single case study aimed to examine the logics of one teacher education program towards preparing pre-service teachers for inclusive teaching from the perspectives of the program’s coordinators. In particular, the study aimed to understand the practices of these coordinators and how these practices are influenced by inclusive education and teacher education policies. This examination would reveal how education policies are enacted in this particular case. New-Institutionalism (NI) theory (DiMaggio & Powell, 1991) constituted the theoretical framework that guided the methodology as well as the analysis of the findings. The study revealed that the coordinators’ understanding and practices around the existing inclusion and teacher education policies emerge from their own experiences in this particular program, intermingled with their beliefs about how inclusion should be enacted in teacher education and schools. Key findings included coordinators developing inclusive mindsets among pre-service teachers, negotiating their logics towards inclusion through modeling inclusive teaching practices in the university classroom, and engaging them in critical discussions around inclusion policy practice in schools, and coordinators calling for a curriculum policy change. Recommendations for future teacher education programming in response to the evolving inclusive education are offered.","PeriodicalId":43834,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1075670AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This qualitative single case study aimed to examine the logics of one teacher education program towards preparing pre-service teachers for inclusive teaching from the perspectives of the program’s coordinators. In particular, the study aimed to understand the practices of these coordinators and how these practices are influenced by inclusive education and teacher education policies. This examination would reveal how education policies are enacted in this particular case. New-Institutionalism (NI) theory (DiMaggio & Powell, 1991) constituted the theoretical framework that guided the methodology as well as the analysis of the findings. The study revealed that the coordinators’ understanding and practices around the existing inclusion and teacher education policies emerge from their own experiences in this particular program, intermingled with their beliefs about how inclusion should be enacted in teacher education and schools. Key findings included coordinators developing inclusive mindsets among pre-service teachers, negotiating their logics towards inclusion through modeling inclusive teaching practices in the university classroom, and engaging them in critical discussions around inclusion policy practice in schools, and coordinators calling for a curriculum policy change. Recommendations for future teacher education programming in response to the evolving inclusive education are offered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师教育包容性政策制定的新制度分析——以安大略省为例
这项定性的单一案例研究旨在从项目协调员的角度考察一个教师教育项目为职前教师进行包容性教学做好准备的逻辑。特别是,该研究旨在了解这些协调员的做法,以及这些做法如何受到包容性教育和教师教育政策的影响。这项研究将揭示在这种特殊情况下教育政策是如何制定的。新制度主义(NI)理论(DiMaggio&Powell,1991)构成了指导方法论和研究结果分析的理论框架。研究表明,协调员对现有包容性和教师教育政策的理解和实践源于他们在这一特定项目中的亲身经历,与他们对如何在教师教育和学校中实施包容性的信念交织在一起。关键发现包括协调员在职前教师中培养包容性心态,通过在大学课堂上模拟包容性教学实践来协商他们的包容性逻辑,并让他们参与围绕学校包容性政策实践的批判性讨论,以及协调员呼吁改变课程政策。针对不断发展的包容性教育,提出了未来教师教育规划的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Examining the Virtual Leadership of Leaders in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study Educational Politics and Policy Change in Neoliberal Times: An Argumentative Discourse Analysis Flourishing School Leadership: Perspectives of Canada’s Outstanding Principals Academic Women’s Labour During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature Les diplômés d’immersion française et leurs motivations liées au choix de la langue dans la poursuite des études postsecondaires
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1