That's Not a Wolf: English Misconceptions and the Fate of New England's Indigenous Dogs

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1353/wmq.2022.0031
Strother E. Roberts
{"title":"That's Not a Wolf: English Misconceptions and the Fate of New England's Indigenous Dogs","authors":"Strother E. Roberts","doi":"10.1353/wmq.2022.0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Early modern English explorers and settlers in New England and elsewhere routinely mistook indigenous American dogs for wolves. This repeated misidentification arose in part from aspects of indigenous dog morphology, but it also served to denigrate Native American cultures by denying their possession of domesticated animals. Modern environmental historians have unconsciously reproduced these prejudices against indigenous dogs without critically assessing their accuracy or their function as part of the rhetoric of colonialism. Indigenous dogs have been presented as incompletely domesticated, \"semiwild\" creatures when in reality they were just as domesticated as their European cousins. Indigenous dogs were the most numerous nonhuman large predators in early New England, but their misidentification as wolves has caused them to be largely overlooked in the historical record. Their population plummeted over the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as the Native communities to which they belonged suffered from introduced disease and English aggression. English efforts both to protect livestock through a war on wolves and to control loose dogs increased pressure on dogs of indigenous heritage. In the end, the English cultural prejudice against wolfish-looking dogs that erased indigenous dogs from the historical record largely erased living indigenous dogs from the New England landscape.","PeriodicalId":51566,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wmq.2022.0031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Early modern English explorers and settlers in New England and elsewhere routinely mistook indigenous American dogs for wolves. This repeated misidentification arose in part from aspects of indigenous dog morphology, but it also served to denigrate Native American cultures by denying their possession of domesticated animals. Modern environmental historians have unconsciously reproduced these prejudices against indigenous dogs without critically assessing their accuracy or their function as part of the rhetoric of colonialism. Indigenous dogs have been presented as incompletely domesticated, "semiwild" creatures when in reality they were just as domesticated as their European cousins. Indigenous dogs were the most numerous nonhuman large predators in early New England, but their misidentification as wolves has caused them to be largely overlooked in the historical record. Their population plummeted over the course of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as the Native communities to which they belonged suffered from introduced disease and English aggression. English efforts both to protect livestock through a war on wolves and to control loose dogs increased pressure on dogs of indigenous heritage. In the end, the English cultural prejudice against wolfish-looking dogs that erased indigenous dogs from the historical record largely erased living indigenous dogs from the New England landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
那不是狼:英国人的误解和新英格兰土着狗的命运
摘要:在新英格兰和其他地方的早期现代英国探险家和定居者经常把美洲土著狗误认为狼。这种反复的误认在一定程度上源于土著狗的形态,但它也通过否认美洲原住民拥有驯养动物来诋毁他们的文化。现代环境历史学家无意识地再现了这些对土著狗的偏见,而没有批判性地评估它们的准确性或作为殖民主义言论的一部分的功能。土著狗被认为是不完全驯化的“半野生”生物,而事实上,它们和欧洲表亲一样被驯化。在新英格兰早期,土著狗是数量最多的非人类大型食肉动物,但它们被误认为狼,导致它们在历史记录中基本上被忽视了。在17世纪和18世纪,由于他们所属的土著社区遭受了外来疾病和英国人的侵略,他们的人口急剧下降。英国通过对狼的战争来保护牲畜和控制流浪狗的努力增加了对土著犬的压力。最终,英国人对长得像狼的狗的文化偏见将土著狗从历史记录中抹去,这在很大程度上将活着的土著狗从新英格兰景观中抹去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Cultivating Empire: Capitalism, Philanthropy, and the Negotiation of American Imperialism in Indian Country by Lori J. Daggar (review) The Great Power of Native Women Editor's Note: "Methods and Practices" Historical Care and the (Re)Writing of Sexual Violence in the Colonial Americas To Her Credit: Women, Finance, and the Law in Eighteenth-Century New England Cities by Sara T. Damiano (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1