Governance challenges of flood-prone delta cities: Integrating flood risk management and climate change in spatial planning

IF 5 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Progress in Planning Pub Date : 2017-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.progress.2015.11.001
Maria Francesch-Huidobro , Marcin Dabrowski , Yuting Tai , Faith Chan , Dominic Stead
{"title":"Governance challenges of flood-prone delta cities: Integrating flood risk management and climate change in spatial planning","authors":"Maria Francesch-Huidobro ,&nbsp;Marcin Dabrowski ,&nbsp;Yuting Tai ,&nbsp;Faith Chan ,&nbsp;Dominic Stead","doi":"10.1016/j.progress.2015.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Delta cities are increasingly exposed to the risks of climate change, particularly to flooding. As a consequence, a variety of new spatial development visions, strategies, plans and programmes are being developed by city governments in delta regions to address these risks and challenges. Based on a general conceptual framework, this paper examines the nature of visions, strategies, plans and programmes in the delta cities of Hong Kong, Guangzhou and Rotterdam which are highly exposed to flooding and connected through a network of epistemic communities. The paper follows two main lines of inquiry. First, it examines the terms, concepts, and dominant institutional characteristics associated with the development of these visions, strategies, plans and programmes as a way of constructing a conceptual framework for understanding and explaining their connectivity. Second, it explores how and why cities’ spatial plans and governance dynamics are shaping climate adaptation responses. The systematic development of conceptual frameworks and in-depth analyses of varied, representative case studies is needed as their findings have important implications for vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in terms of policy options and cities as the optimal level for adaptation. The paper finds that dominant institutional characteristics critically affect the steering capacity of organisations/agencies (including their coordination capacity) to address climate-related risks. The findings have important implications for vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in cities, in general and delta cities, in particular.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47399,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Planning","volume":"114 ","pages":"Pages 1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.progress.2015.11.001","citationCount":"73","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Planning","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305900615000628","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 73

Abstract

Delta cities are increasingly exposed to the risks of climate change, particularly to flooding. As a consequence, a variety of new spatial development visions, strategies, plans and programmes are being developed by city governments in delta regions to address these risks and challenges. Based on a general conceptual framework, this paper examines the nature of visions, strategies, plans and programmes in the delta cities of Hong Kong, Guangzhou and Rotterdam which are highly exposed to flooding and connected through a network of epistemic communities. The paper follows two main lines of inquiry. First, it examines the terms, concepts, and dominant institutional characteristics associated with the development of these visions, strategies, plans and programmes as a way of constructing a conceptual framework for understanding and explaining their connectivity. Second, it explores how and why cities’ spatial plans and governance dynamics are shaping climate adaptation responses. The systematic development of conceptual frameworks and in-depth analyses of varied, representative case studies is needed as their findings have important implications for vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in terms of policy options and cities as the optimal level for adaptation. The paper finds that dominant institutional characteristics critically affect the steering capacity of organisations/agencies (including their coordination capacity) to address climate-related risks. The findings have important implications for vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in cities, in general and delta cities, in particular.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洪水易发三角洲城市的治理挑战:在空间规划中整合洪水风险管理和气候变化
三角洲城市越来越多地面临气候变化的风险,尤其是洪水。因此,三角洲地区的城市政府正在制定各种新的空间发展愿景、战略、计划和方案,以应对这些风险和挑战。基于一般概念框架,本文研究了香港、广州和鹿特丹三角洲城市的愿景、战略、计划和方案的本质,这些城市高度暴露于洪水并通过认知社区网络连接起来。本文遵循两条主要的研究思路。首先,它考察了与这些愿景、战略、计划和方案的发展相关的术语、概念和主要制度特征,作为构建理解和解释它们之间联系的概念框架的一种方式。其次,探讨了城市空间规划和治理动态如何以及为何影响气候适应响应。系统地发展概念框架和深入分析各种有代表性的案例研究是必要的,因为它们的研究结果对气候变化的脆弱性和适应具有重要意义,就政策选择和城市作为适应的最佳水平而言。本文发现,占主导地位的制度特征严重影响组织/机构应对气候相关风险的指导能力(包括协调能力)。这些发现对城市(特别是三角洲城市)的气候变化脆弱性和适应具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
1.60%
发文量
26
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Planning is a multidisciplinary journal of research monographs offering a convenient and rapid outlet for extended papers in the field of spatial and environmental planning. Each issue comprises a single monograph of between 25,000 and 35,000 words. The journal is fully peer reviewed, has a global readership, and has been in publication since 1972.
期刊最新文献
Mapping urban health policies: A scoping review of environmental, behavioural and socioeconomic determinants of health Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Immigrants, slums, and housing policy: The spatial dispersal of the Ethiopian population in Israel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1