{"title":"The Long-Lasting Influence of Ideological Prejudices: The Case of Ye Lingfeng (1905-1975), a Misunderstood Writer and Intellectual in Modern China","authors":"S. Stafutti","doi":"10.13135/1825-263X/3618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through the works and some biographical issues of Ye Lingfeng (1905-1975), one of the writers of the so-called Shanghai School ( haipai , 海派), this paper aims to offer some hints of the multi-folded bunch of prejudices which the history of modern Chinese literature is intertwined with. To reach this goal, the following issues will be taken into consideration: 1. an analysis of Ye Lingfeng’s early production, before his moving from mainland China to Hongkong – with particular reference to The Dream of a Virgin Chunude meng , (处女的梦, Chunude meng), in comparison with Ding Ling (丁玲) Miss Sophia’s Diary ( Shafei nushi de rij, 莎菲女士的日记); to which a much bigger success arose; 2. a general description of the complicated issues which led inflicting on him the very unfair label of being a “traitor”, moving from his clash with Lu Xun in the late The twenties and early Thirties to his “collaboration” with the Nationalist Party during the first period of his staying in Hong Kong; 3. an overview of his literary works in order to highlight his way to connect traditional and modern literary tradition, which – if prejudices were not working - could provide some suggestions to the core issue of the relationship between “classic” (feudal?) literature and the literature of New China.","PeriodicalId":37635,"journal":{"name":"Kervan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kervan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/1825-263X/3618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Through the works and some biographical issues of Ye Lingfeng (1905-1975), one of the writers of the so-called Shanghai School ( haipai , 海派), this paper aims to offer some hints of the multi-folded bunch of prejudices which the history of modern Chinese literature is intertwined with. To reach this goal, the following issues will be taken into consideration: 1. an analysis of Ye Lingfeng’s early production, before his moving from mainland China to Hongkong – with particular reference to The Dream of a Virgin Chunude meng , (处女的梦, Chunude meng), in comparison with Ding Ling (丁玲) Miss Sophia’s Diary ( Shafei nushi de rij, 莎菲女士的日记); to which a much bigger success arose; 2. a general description of the complicated issues which led inflicting on him the very unfair label of being a “traitor”, moving from his clash with Lu Xun in the late The twenties and early Thirties to his “collaboration” with the Nationalist Party during the first period of his staying in Hong Kong; 3. an overview of his literary works in order to highlight his way to connect traditional and modern literary tradition, which – if prejudices were not working - could provide some suggestions to the core issue of the relationship between “classic” (feudal?) literature and the literature of New China.
通过所谓海派作家之一叶灵凤(1905-1975)的作品和一些传记问题海派), 本文旨在为中国现代文学史上交织在一起的多重偏见提供一些启示。为了实现这一目标,将考虑以下问题:1。叶灵凤从大陆移居香港前的早期作品分析——特别是《童梦》(处女的梦,孟)与丁玲的比较(丁玲)《索菲亚小姐日记》(Shafei nushi de rij莎菲女士的日记);取得了更大的成功;2、从二十、三十年代末与鲁迅的冲突,到他在香港的第一个时期与国民党的“合作”,这些复杂的问题给他贴上了非常不公平的“汉奸”的标签;3.概述他的文学作品,以突出他将传统文学传统与现代文学传统联系起来的方式,如果偏见不起作用的话,这可以为“古典”(封建?)文学与新中国文学关系的核心问题提供一些建议。
KervanArts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍:
The journal has three main aims. First of all, it aims at encouraging interdisciplinary research on Asia and Africa, maintaining high research standards. Second, by providing a global forum for Asian and African scholars, it promotes dialogue between the global academic community and civil society, emphasizing patterns and tendencies that go beyond national borders and are globally relevant. The third aim for a specialized academic journal is to widen the opportunities for publishing worthy scholarly studies, to stimulate debate, to create an ideal agora where ideas and research results can be compared and contrasted. Another challenge is to combine a scientific approach and the interest for cultural debate, artistic production, biographic narrative, etcetera. This journal wants to be original (even hybrid) also in its structure, where academic rigor should not hinder access to the vitality of experience and of artistic and cultural production.