Practice-Crosscutting Concept pairs of the NGSS and ways of knowing in the Earth & Space Sciences

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Geoscience Education Pub Date : 2022-10-17 DOI:10.1080/10899995.2022.2126652
N. Price
{"title":"Practice-Crosscutting Concept pairs of the NGSS and ways of knowing in the Earth & Space Sciences","authors":"N. Price","doi":"10.1080/10899995.2022.2126652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The epistemic components of science are included in instruction through the three-dimensional learning of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Students use the Science & Engineering Practices to engage the Disciplinary Core Ideas through the perspective of the Crosscutting Concepts. The NGSS focus on the epistemic aspects that all sciences share, but the domain-specific epistemic aspects, referred to here as ways of knowing, are still important to include in science education because they require different pedagogical methods. In this paper, I show how curriculum developers can incorporate the ways of knowing of the Earth & Space Sciences into their units through the choice of Practices and Crosscutting Concepts in the lesson-specific learning performance statements. I start by identifying the most common Practice-Crosscutting Concept pairs of the Earth & Space Sciences performance expectations and comparing them to the literature on the ways of knowing in the geosciences. The performance expectations represent the multiple modes of inquiry and systems thinking characteristic of the Earth & Space Sciences. Yet, they don’t effectively represent other aspects of the Earth & Space Sciences, like visualization, spatial reasoning, deep time, and large size and spatial scales. I then encourage curriculum developers to move beyond the example of the performance expectations by providing suggested Practice and Crosscutting Concept pairs and groupings that can be used by curriculum developers to communicate these other aspects. I also include example unit outlines to show what the suggestions might look like in application.","PeriodicalId":35858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geoscience Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geoscience Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2022.2126652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The epistemic components of science are included in instruction through the three-dimensional learning of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Students use the Science & Engineering Practices to engage the Disciplinary Core Ideas through the perspective of the Crosscutting Concepts. The NGSS focus on the epistemic aspects that all sciences share, but the domain-specific epistemic aspects, referred to here as ways of knowing, are still important to include in science education because they require different pedagogical methods. In this paper, I show how curriculum developers can incorporate the ways of knowing of the Earth & Space Sciences into their units through the choice of Practices and Crosscutting Concepts in the lesson-specific learning performance statements. I start by identifying the most common Practice-Crosscutting Concept pairs of the Earth & Space Sciences performance expectations and comparing them to the literature on the ways of knowing in the geosciences. The performance expectations represent the multiple modes of inquiry and systems thinking characteristic of the Earth & Space Sciences. Yet, they don’t effectively represent other aspects of the Earth & Space Sciences, like visualization, spatial reasoning, deep time, and large size and spatial scales. I then encourage curriculum developers to move beyond the example of the performance expectations by providing suggested Practice and Crosscutting Concept pairs and groupings that can be used by curriculum developers to communicate these other aspects. I also include example unit outlines to show what the suggestions might look like in application.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在地球和空间科学中实践NGSS的交叉概念对和认识方式
摘要通过对下一代科学标准(NGSS)的三维学习,将科学的认识成分纳入教学中。学生利用科学与工程实践,通过交叉概念的视角,参与学科核心思想。NGSS专注于所有科学共享的认知方面,但特定领域的认知方面(此处称为认知方式)仍然很重要,需要纳入科学教育,因为它们需要不同的教学方法。在这篇论文中,我展示了课程开发人员如何通过在特定课程的学习表现陈述中选择实践和交叉概念,将了解地球与空间科学的方法融入到他们的单元中。首先,我确定了地球与空间科学绩效预期中最常见的实践交叉概念对,并将其与地球科学中关于认识方式的文献进行了比较。绩效期望代表了地球与空间科学的多种探究模式和系统思维特征。然而,它们并不能有效地代表地球与空间科学的其他方面,如可视化、空间推理、深度时间以及大尺寸和空间尺度。然后,我鼓励课程开发人员超越绩效期望的例子,提供建议的实践和交叉概念配对和分组,课程开发人员可以使用这些配对和分组来交流这些其他方面。我还包括了示例单元大纲,以显示在应用程序中可能出现的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geoscience Education
Journal of Geoscience Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geoscience Education (JGE) is a peer-reviewed publication for geoscience education research, and serves as an international forum for research concerning the pedagogy, assessment, and philosophy of teaching and learning about the geosciences and related domains. JGE is a publication of the National Association of Geoscience Teachers, a non-profit, member-driven organization that supports a diverse, inclusive, and thriving community of educators and education researchers to improve teaching and learning about the Earth.
期刊最新文献
Impact of a place-based educational approach on student and community members’ experiences and learning within a post-secondary GIS course Student and public perceptions of stormwater runoff and its impact on public health in a Southern California coastal community The Food-Energy-Water Nexus: Assessing undergraduate students’ decision making about complex socio-hydrologic issues supported by Hydroviz A case study of HyFlex in GIS classes at the University of Illinois Patterns in student self-reported situational interest in online introductory geoscience labs during COVID
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1