The Lighting of the BECONs

D. Borsboom, T. Blanken, F. Dablander, Frenk van Harreveld, C. Tanis, P. Van Mieghem
{"title":"The Lighting of the BECONs","authors":"D. Borsboom, T. Blanken, F. Dablander, Frenk van Harreveld, C. Tanis, P. Van Mieghem","doi":"10.35566/jbds/v2n1/p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe imposition of lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 outbreak has underscored the importance of human behavior in mitigating virus transmission. The scientific study of interventions designed to change behavior (e.g., to promote physical distancing) requires measures of effectiveness that are fast, that can be assessed through experiments, and that can be investigated without actual virus transmission. This paper presents a methodological approach designed to deliver such indicators. We show how behavioral data, obtainable through wearable assessment devices or camera footage, can be used to assess the effect of interventions in experimental research; in addition, the approach can be extended to longitudinal data involving contact tracing apps. Our methodology operates by constructing a contact network: a representation that encodes which individuals have been in physical proximity long enough to transmit the virus. Because behavioral interventions alter the contact network, a comparison of contact networks before and after the intervention can provide information on the effectiveness of the intervention. We coin indicators based on this idea Behavioral Contact Network (BECON) indicators. We examine the performance of three indicators: the Density BECON, based on differences in network density; the Spectral BECON, based on differences in the eigenvector of the adjacency matrix; and the ASPL BECON, based on differences in average shortest path lengths. Using simulations, we show that all three indicators can effectively track the effect of behavioral interventions. Even in conditions with significant amounts of noise, BECON indicators can reliably identify and order effect sizes of interventions. The present paper invites further study of the method as well as practical implementations to test the validity of BECON indicators in real data. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":93575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of behavioral data science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of behavioral data science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35566/jbds/v2n1/p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The imposition of lockdowns in response to the COVID-19 outbreak has underscored the importance of human behavior in mitigating virus transmission. The scientific study of interventions designed to change behavior (e.g., to promote physical distancing) requires measures of effectiveness that are fast, that can be assessed through experiments, and that can be investigated without actual virus transmission. This paper presents a methodological approach designed to deliver such indicators. We show how behavioral data, obtainable through wearable assessment devices or camera footage, can be used to assess the effect of interventions in experimental research; in addition, the approach can be extended to longitudinal data involving contact tracing apps. Our methodology operates by constructing a contact network: a representation that encodes which individuals have been in physical proximity long enough to transmit the virus. Because behavioral interventions alter the contact network, a comparison of contact networks before and after the intervention can provide information on the effectiveness of the intervention. We coin indicators based on this idea Behavioral Contact Network (BECON) indicators. We examine the performance of three indicators: the Density BECON, based on differences in network density; the Spectral BECON, based on differences in the eigenvector of the adjacency matrix; and the ASPL BECON, based on differences in average shortest path lengths. Using simulations, we show that all three indicators can effectively track the effect of behavioral interventions. Even in conditions with significant amounts of noise, BECON indicators can reliably identify and order effect sizes of interventions. The present paper invites further study of the method as well as practical implementations to test the validity of BECON indicators in real data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灯塔的照明
为应对COVID-19疫情而实施的封锁凸显了人类行为对减轻病毒传播的重要性。对旨在改变行为(例如促进保持身体距离)的干预措施进行科学研究,需要采取快速、可通过实验进行评估、可在没有实际病毒传播的情况下进行调查的有效性措施。本文提出了一种旨在提供此类指标的方法学方法。我们展示了如何通过可穿戴评估设备或摄像机镜头获取行为数据,以评估实验研究中干预措施的效果;此外,该方法还可以扩展到涉及接触追踪应用程序的纵向数据。我们的方法是通过构建一个接触网络来运作的:这是一个代表,它编码了哪些人在物理上接近的时间足够长,可以传播病毒。由于行为干预改变了接触网络,比较干预前后的接触网络可以提供干预有效性的信息。我们基于这个想法创造了行为接触网络(BECON)指标。我们考察了三个指标的性能:基于网络密度差异的密度BECON;基于邻接矩阵特征向量差异的谱BECON;以及基于平均最短路径长度差异的ASPL BECON。通过模拟,我们发现这三个指标都可以有效地跟踪行为干预的效果。即使在有大量噪声的条件下,BECON指标也可以可靠地识别和排序干预措施的效果大小。本文邀请进一步研究该方法以及在实际数据中检验BECON指标有效性的实际实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rephrasing the Lengthy and Involved Proof of Kristof’s Theorem: A Tutorial with Some New Findings Stability and Spread: Transition Metrics that are Robust to Time Interval Misspecification A Novel Approach for Identifying Unobserved Heterogeneity in Longitudinal Growth Trajectories Using Natural Cubic Smoothing Splines A Proof-of-Concept Study Demonstrating How FITBIR Datasets Can be Harmonized to Examine Posttraumatic Stress Disorder-Traumatic Brain Injury Associations Loss Aversion Distribution: The Science Behind Loss Aversion Exhibited by Sellers of Perishable Good
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1