Is board-tie among rivals harmful to customers? Evidence from banks’ project-financing consortium

IF 0.9 4区 管理学 Q4 BUSINESS South African Journal of Business Management Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.3573
S. K. Lee, Sunki Lee
{"title":"Is board-tie among rivals harmful to customers? Evidence from banks’ project-financing consortium","authors":"S. K. Lee, Sunki Lee","doi":"10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.3573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Are board ties among competitors harmful to customers? The prevalent assumption on board ties among competitors is that they harm customer benefits. This study examines the mechanism by which board ties with competitors result in an outcome conducive to customers.Design/methodology/approach: Based on a sample of 79 savings banks in South Korea, we investigate the extent of banks’ board ties with other banks and their engagement in a project financing (PF) consortium from 2014 to 2020. The generalised least square was adopted to test the hypotheses. We also performed several supplemental analyses to further support our results.Findings/results: Savings banks with greater board ties with rivals provided more financial opportunities to their customers by forming PF consortia more actively with other banks. Furthermore, the positive impact of board ties on banks’ participation in a PF consortium increases, especially when the proportion of external shareholders is smaller or when savings banks are family firms.Practical implications: Outside directors can not only play the role of monitoring the management but also serve as assistants who can help banks provide financial services (or products) that banks could not provide individually.Originality/value: While prior studies have clearly recognised the negative impacts on customers of board-friendship ties among rivals, little attention has been paid to the potential mechanism by which board ties among competing firms can benefit customers. This study challenges the dominant assumption by demonstrating that savings banks with greater board ties with other banks provide more financial opportunities to their economically weak customers.Contribution: Finally, this study contributes to the family business literature by providing insight into how the unique characteristics of family firms in strategic choices make outside directors contribute as assistants than supervisors.","PeriodicalId":45649,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Business Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.3573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Are board ties among competitors harmful to customers? The prevalent assumption on board ties among competitors is that they harm customer benefits. This study examines the mechanism by which board ties with competitors result in an outcome conducive to customers.Design/methodology/approach: Based on a sample of 79 savings banks in South Korea, we investigate the extent of banks’ board ties with other banks and their engagement in a project financing (PF) consortium from 2014 to 2020. The generalised least square was adopted to test the hypotheses. We also performed several supplemental analyses to further support our results.Findings/results: Savings banks with greater board ties with rivals provided more financial opportunities to their customers by forming PF consortia more actively with other banks. Furthermore, the positive impact of board ties on banks’ participation in a PF consortium increases, especially when the proportion of external shareholders is smaller or when savings banks are family firms.Practical implications: Outside directors can not only play the role of monitoring the management but also serve as assistants who can help banks provide financial services (or products) that banks could not provide individually.Originality/value: While prior studies have clearly recognised the negative impacts on customers of board-friendship ties among rivals, little attention has been paid to the potential mechanism by which board ties among competing firms can benefit customers. This study challenges the dominant assumption by demonstrating that savings banks with greater board ties with other banks provide more financial opportunities to their economically weak customers.Contribution: Finally, this study contributes to the family business literature by providing insight into how the unique characteristics of family firms in strategic choices make outside directors contribute as assistants than supervisors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争对手之间的董事会平局对客户有害吗?来自银行项目融资财团的证据
目的:竞争对手之间的董事会关系对客户有害吗?关于竞争对手之间董事会关系的普遍假设是,它们损害了客户利益。本研究考察了董事会与竞争对手的关系产生有利于客户的结果的机制。设计/方法/方法:基于韩国79家储蓄银行的样本,我们调查了银行董事会与其他银行的联系程度以及他们在2014年至2020年期间参与项目融资(PF)财团的程度。采用广义最小二乘法对假设进行检验。我们还进行了一些补充分析来进一步支持我们的结果。发现/结果:与竞争对手董事会联系更紧密的储蓄银行通过更积极地与其他银行组成PF联盟,为其客户提供了更多的金融机会。此外,董事会关系对银行参与PF财团的积极影响增加,特别是当外部股东比例较小或储蓄银行是家族企业时。实践启示:外部董事不仅可以起到监督管理层的作用,还可以起到协助银行提供银行个人无法提供的金融服务(或产品)的作用。原创性/价值:虽然先前的研究已经清楚地认识到竞争对手之间的董事会友谊关系对客户的负面影响,但很少关注竞争公司之间的董事会关系可以使客户受益的潜在机制。这项研究通过证明与其他银行有更大董事会联系的储蓄银行为其经济实力较弱的客户提供更多的金融机会,挑战了主流假设。贡献:最后,本研究对家族企业文献的贡献在于洞察家族企业在战略选择方面的独特特征如何使外部董事作为助手而不是监督者做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Business Management publishes articles that have real significance for management theory and practice. The content of the journal falls into two categories: managerial theory and management practice: -Management theory is devoted to reporting new methodological developments, whether analytical or philosophical. In general, papers should, in addition to developing a new theory, include some discussion of applications, either historical or potential. Both state-of-the-art surveys and papers discussing new developments are appropriate for this category. -Management practice concerns the methodology involved in applying scientific knowledge. It focusses on the problems of developing and converting management theory to practice while considering behavioural and economic realities. Papers should reflect the mutual interest of managers and management scientists in the exercise of the management function. Appropriate papers may include examples of implementations that generalise experience rather than specific incidents and facts, and principles of model development and adaptation that underline successful application of particular aspects of management theory. The relevance of the paper to the professional manager should be highlighted as far as possible.
期刊最新文献
Exploring financial literacy education strategies based on small- and micro-enterprise business practices SMEs perception related to their trade credit management effectiveness The antecedents of patient experience of aesthetic clinic and its impact on revisit intention Surveying the reputation-regulation interface in the SABI industry: Perspectives of private banking customers Positive delay? The influence of perceived stress on active procrastination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1