Process-Based Emission Modelling for Sustainability Assessment in Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Comparative Study

Q4 Environmental Science Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management Pub Date : 2022-05-01 DOI:10.5276/jswtm/2022.182
Michael-Agwuoke, Macbeda Uche, Jacqueline L. Whalley, L. Chile, P. Sallis
{"title":"Process-Based Emission Modelling for Sustainability Assessment in Municipal Solid Waste Management: A Comparative Study","authors":"Michael-Agwuoke, Macbeda Uche, Jacqueline L. Whalley, L. Chile, P. Sallis","doi":"10.5276/jswtm/2022.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developments in Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) systems depend on socio-cultural, political, economic, and environmental issues. The ability to assess and evaluate the level and nature of these relationships plays a critical role in measuring the performance level vis-à-vis\n sustainability of waste management systems. The current criteria adopted for assessing waste management performance do not capture an accurate and comprehensive representation of MSWM scenarios from collection to disposal. Hence the methodologies do not accurately measure the level of impacts\n resulting from waste management systems or, indirectly, the environmental, economic, social, and cultural costs of MSWM. This research develops a waste management performance assessment protocol that captures all relevant components of waste management processes. The methodology is based on\n emission as the indicator of choice for assessing the performance of a city-wide or regional waste management system. The study developed a framework, Comprehensive Emission Quantification Model (CEQ-Model), for measuring the sustainability of the MSWM system hinged on process-based emission\n modelling. This framework incorporated aspects of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines and Life Cycle Thinking (LCT), framed using carefully selected MSWM scenarios in New Zealand. In a ranked cumulative emission quantification assessment of four Territorial Authorities\n (TA), the research determined the performance level of each TA relative to others. Auckland Council, with a total emission of 4.272x1012 KgCO2-e generated from disposing of 2,425,022 tonnes of waste, was the most unsustainable territory, followed by Rotorua District with\n total emission of 6.666x10 10 KgCO2-e from 45,000 tonnes of waste, and Waikato District with emission of 5.380x10 10 KgCO2-e from 29,796 tonnes. In comparison, the most sustainable TA is Opotiki District with total emission of 2.314x10 9 KgCO2-e from 1,450\n tonnes of waste, giving emission per tonne of waste per year as 1.762 GgCO2-e, 1.806 GgCO2-e, 1.6 GgCO2-e, and 1.481 GgCO2-e for Auckland Council, Waikato District, Opotiki District, and Rotorua District respectively.","PeriodicalId":35783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5276/jswtm/2022.182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Developments in Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) systems depend on socio-cultural, political, economic, and environmental issues. The ability to assess and evaluate the level and nature of these relationships plays a critical role in measuring the performance level vis-à-vis sustainability of waste management systems. The current criteria adopted for assessing waste management performance do not capture an accurate and comprehensive representation of MSWM scenarios from collection to disposal. Hence the methodologies do not accurately measure the level of impacts resulting from waste management systems or, indirectly, the environmental, economic, social, and cultural costs of MSWM. This research develops a waste management performance assessment protocol that captures all relevant components of waste management processes. The methodology is based on emission as the indicator of choice for assessing the performance of a city-wide or regional waste management system. The study developed a framework, Comprehensive Emission Quantification Model (CEQ-Model), for measuring the sustainability of the MSWM system hinged on process-based emission modelling. This framework incorporated aspects of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines and Life Cycle Thinking (LCT), framed using carefully selected MSWM scenarios in New Zealand. In a ranked cumulative emission quantification assessment of four Territorial Authorities (TA), the research determined the performance level of each TA relative to others. Auckland Council, with a total emission of 4.272x1012 KgCO2-e generated from disposing of 2,425,022 tonnes of waste, was the most unsustainable territory, followed by Rotorua District with total emission of 6.666x10 10 KgCO2-e from 45,000 tonnes of waste, and Waikato District with emission of 5.380x10 10 KgCO2-e from 29,796 tonnes. In comparison, the most sustainable TA is Opotiki District with total emission of 2.314x10 9 KgCO2-e from 1,450 tonnes of waste, giving emission per tonne of waste per year as 1.762 GgCO2-e, 1.806 GgCO2-e, 1.6 GgCO2-e, and 1.481 GgCO2-e for Auckland Council, Waikato District, Opotiki District, and Rotorua District respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于过程的城市固体废物管理可持续性评价排放模型的比较研究
城市固体废物管理系统的发展取决于社会文化、政治、经济和环境问题。评估和评估这些关系的水平和性质的能力在衡量废物管理系统相对于可持续性的绩效水平方面发挥着关键作用。目前用于评估废物管理绩效的标准没有准确、全面地反映从收集到处置的MSWM情景。因此,这些方法无法准确衡量废物管理系统造成的影响程度,也无法间接衡量MSWM的环境、经济、社会和文化成本。这项研究开发了一个废物管理绩效评估协议,该协议涵盖了废物管理过程的所有相关组成部分。该方法基于排放作为评估全市或区域废物管理系统绩效的首选指标。该研究开发了一个框架,即综合排放量化模型(CEQ模型),用于衡量基于过程的排放建模的MSWM系统的可持续性。该框架纳入了政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)指南和生命周期思维(LCT)的各个方面,并使用新西兰精心选择的MSWM情景构建。在对四个地区当局(TA)进行的累积排放量化排名评估中,该研究确定了每个TA相对于其他TA的绩效水平。奥克兰市议会处理2425022吨废物产生的总排放量为4.272x1012千克二氧化碳当量,是最不可持续的地区,其次是罗托鲁瓦区,45000吨废物的总排放总量为6.666x10 10千克二氧化碳当量;怀卡托区,29796吨废物的排放量为5.380x10 10克二氧化碳当量。相比之下,最可持续的TA是奥波蒂基区,1450吨废物的总排放量为2.314x109千克二氧化碳当量,奥克兰市议会、怀卡托区、奥波蒂奇区和罗托鲁瓦区每年每吨废物的排放量分别为1.762千克二氧化碳当量、1.806克二氧化碳当量、1.6克二氧化碳当量和1.481克二氧化碳当量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management
Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management Environmental Science-Waste Management and Disposal
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management is an international peer-reviewed journal covering landfill, recycling, waste-to-energy, waste reduction, policy and economics, composting, waste collection and transfer, municipal waste, industrial waste, residual waste and other waste management and technology subjects. The Journal is published quarterly (February, May, August, November) by the Widener University School of Engineering. It is supported by a distinguished international editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Roles of Public Financing to Address Urban Faecal Sludge Management (FSM) Services in Bangladesh: a Study of Dhaka And Faridpur Cities Removal of Nickel (II) Ion from an Aqueous Solution Using Red Brick as an Adsorbent Assessment of Solid Waste Management Practices and Role of Community Participation in Mettu Town, Ethiopia 'Clean Food': A Model for Safe and Sustainable Agriculture Towards Accomplishment of Circular Economy Improving Solid Waste Management Practices in Primary Schools in Ibadan, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1