Civic participation digitalisation: limitations in the digital divides field

M. Gruzdeva
{"title":"Civic participation digitalisation: limitations in the digital divides field","authors":"M. Gruzdeva","doi":"10.26425/2658-347x-2022-5-1-15-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Russian public discourse, digitalisation is recognised as a new global trend, which creates an environment with extensive communication possibilities and leads to the civic participation traditional practices reformatting to online. In this regard, it is relevant to study the opportunities, risks and necessary conditions for these transformations. The aim of the article is to identify the civic participation digitalisation limitations of the population, lying in the digital differences field. Settlement, age, gender, educational and income factors of Internet accessibility, its use purposes and digital skills availability for Russian regions, including the Vologda Region as a typical region are considered. To solve the research problems, sociological methods, secondary data analysis, the system-structural and cross-tabulation analysis method were used. The results of the study conducted have made it possible to identify characteristics according to which certain population groups have a high, medium or low potential for civil society digital inclusion in terms of technical accessibility, knowledge and the Internet experience and digital services. The online citizenship format is most likely to be attractive to young and middle-aged people, working and living in cities, with secondary vocational or higher education. At the research time, no significant gender impact and self-reported income on the digital divides was identified. However, current trends consideration in digitalisation and prolonging the older people active lives makes it possible to argue that potential participants groups in civic participation in an online format will expand in the future. The study results can be considered when planning the civil society development, taking into account current trends, developing tools to motivate different socio-demographic population groups to civic engagement online.","PeriodicalId":52710,"journal":{"name":"Tsifrovaia sotsiologiia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tsifrovaia sotsiologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347x-2022-5-1-15-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Russian public discourse, digitalisation is recognised as a new global trend, which creates an environment with extensive communication possibilities and leads to the civic participation traditional practices reformatting to online. In this regard, it is relevant to study the opportunities, risks and necessary conditions for these transformations. The aim of the article is to identify the civic participation digitalisation limitations of the population, lying in the digital differences field. Settlement, age, gender, educational and income factors of Internet accessibility, its use purposes and digital skills availability for Russian regions, including the Vologda Region as a typical region are considered. To solve the research problems, sociological methods, secondary data analysis, the system-structural and cross-tabulation analysis method were used. The results of the study conducted have made it possible to identify characteristics according to which certain population groups have a high, medium or low potential for civil society digital inclusion in terms of technical accessibility, knowledge and the Internet experience and digital services. The online citizenship format is most likely to be attractive to young and middle-aged people, working and living in cities, with secondary vocational or higher education. At the research time, no significant gender impact and self-reported income on the digital divides was identified. However, current trends consideration in digitalisation and prolonging the older people active lives makes it possible to argue that potential participants groups in civic participation in an online format will expand in the future. The study results can be considered when planning the civil society development, taking into account current trends, developing tools to motivate different socio-demographic population groups to civic engagement online.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公民参与数字化:数字鸿沟领域的局限性
在俄罗斯的公共话语中,数字化被认为是一种新的全球趋势,它创造了一个具有广泛沟通可能性的环境,并导致公民参与的传统做法重新格式化为在线。在这方面,研究这些转变的机会、风险和必要条件是有意义的。本文的目的是在数字差异领域中识别公民参与数字化的局限性。考虑了俄罗斯地区(包括作为典型地区的沃洛格达地区)互联网可及性的定居、年龄、性别、教育和收入因素、其使用目的和数字技能可用性。为了解决研究中存在的问题,本文采用了社会学方法、二手资料分析、系统结构分析和交叉制表分析等方法。所进行的研究结果使人们能够确定在技术可及性、知识和互联网体验以及数字服务方面,某些人口群体在民间社会数字包容方面具有高、中或低潜力的特征。网上公民身份的形式最有可能吸引在城市工作和生活、受过中等职业或高等教育的年轻人和中年人。在研究期间,没有发现显著的性别影响和自我报告的收入对数字鸿沟的影响。然而,考虑到目前数字化和延长老年人积极生活的趋势,我们有可能认为,未来以在线形式参与公民参与的潜在参与者群体将会扩大。研究结果可以在规划公民社会发展时加以考虑,考虑到当前的趋势,开发工具来激励不同的社会人口群体在线公民参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
From quantitative measurement to understanding public demand: Exploring non-survey methods in applied regional research Social risks of internet activity of virtual communities Ethnonational discourse of migrants in social networks on the example of Tajik and Kyrgyz virtual communities on VK Problem of spreading fake information in the Internet space analysis Changing content plan structure of companies operating in Russia and represented on VK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1