Inpatient admission management using multiple criteria decision-making methods

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Operations Research for Health Care Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orhc.2018.10.001
M. Chalgham , I. Khatrouch , M. Masmoudi , O. Chakroun Walha , A. Dammak
{"title":"Inpatient admission management using multiple criteria decision-making methods","authors":"M. Chalgham ,&nbsp;I. Khatrouch ,&nbsp;M. Masmoudi ,&nbsp;O. Chakroun Walha ,&nbsp;A. Dammak","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2018.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding is a </span>public health issue associated with harmful effects simultaneously on patients and ED staff. Despite increased policies and efforts to manage this issue, it continues to rise in many EDs all over the world. ED overcrowding is not caused only by the high number of incoming patients and resources shortage, the most affecting factor leading to such problem is the inpatient boarding. In fact, the patient has to wait too long for an available hospital bed. This paper suggests a new approach to improve the inpatient flow using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. The aim is to make a rational choice of the appropriate department in the ward to which the inpatient can be assigned even if the department related to its pathology is already crowded. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based Delphi is used to collect data. Then, the AHP method is used to determine the weights of criteria that have an impact on the assignment decision. Finally, Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) II, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) II are applied separately to rank the possible inpatient departments in ward in decreasing order of suitability to patient’s pathology. The provided approach is tested to the ED of Habib Bourguiba University hospital of Sfax, Tunisia where the aggregation of AHP-Delphi and TOPSIS is considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2018.10.001","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692317301856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding is a public health issue associated with harmful effects simultaneously on patients and ED staff. Despite increased policies and efforts to manage this issue, it continues to rise in many EDs all over the world. ED overcrowding is not caused only by the high number of incoming patients and resources shortage, the most affecting factor leading to such problem is the inpatient boarding. In fact, the patient has to wait too long for an available hospital bed. This paper suggests a new approach to improve the inpatient flow using Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. The aim is to make a rational choice of the appropriate department in the ward to which the inpatient can be assigned even if the department related to its pathology is already crowded. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based Delphi is used to collect data. Then, the AHP method is used to determine the weights of criteria that have an impact on the assignment decision. Finally, Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) II, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) II are applied separately to rank the possible inpatient departments in ward in decreasing order of suitability to patient’s pathology. The provided approach is tested to the ED of Habib Bourguiba University hospital of Sfax, Tunisia where the aggregation of AHP-Delphi and TOPSIS is considered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院病人住院管理采用多准则决策方法
急诊科(ED)过度拥挤是一个公共卫生问题,同时对患者和急诊室工作人员产生有害影响。尽管加强了管理这一问题的政策和努力,但它在世界各地的许多急诊室中继续上升。造成急诊科过度拥挤的原因不仅仅是入院病人过多和资源短缺,最主要的影响因素是住院病人的入住。事实上,病人要等很长时间才能得到一张可用的病床。本文提出了一种利用多准则决策(MCDM)方法改善住院流程的新方法。这样做的目的是在与病人病理相关的科室已经拥挤的情况下,合理选择住院病人可以分配到的科室。采用基于德尔菲的层次分析法(AHP)进行数据收集。然后,采用层次分析法确定对分配决策有影响的准则的权重。最后,分别应用消除与选择表达现实法(ELECTRE) II、与理想溶液相似排序偏好法(TOPSIS)和富集评价偏好排序组织法(PROMETHEE) II,对病房内可能的住院科室按照患者病理适合程度的递减顺序进行排序。本文对突尼斯Sfax的Habib Bourguiba大学医院的急诊进行了测试,其中考虑了AHP-Delphi和TOPSIS的聚集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preference-based allocation of patients to nursing homes Balancing continuity of care and home care schedule costs using blueprint routes Outpatient appointment systems: A new heuristic with patient classification A modeling framework for evaluating proactive and reactive nurse rostering strategies — A case study from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1