Big Data Analytics and Machine Learning in Supply Chain 4.0: A Literature Review

IF 0.9 Q4 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Stats Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.3390/stats6020038
Elena Barzizza, Nicolò Biasetton, R. Ceccato, L. Salmaso
{"title":"Big Data Analytics and Machine Learning in Supply Chain 4.0: A Literature Review","authors":"Elena Barzizza, Nicolò Biasetton, R. Ceccato, L. Salmaso","doi":"10.3390/stats6020038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Owing to the development of the technologies of Industry 4.0, recent years have witnessed the emergence of a new concept of supply chain management, namely Supply Chain 4.0 (SC 4.0). Huge investments in information technology have enabled manufacturers to trace the intangible flow of information, but instruments are required to take advantage of the available data sources: big data analytics (BDA) and machine learning (ML) represent important tools for this task. Use of advanced technologies can improve supply chain performances and support reaching strategic goals, but their implementation is challenging in supply chain management. The aim of this study was to understand the main benefits, challenges, and areas of application of BDA and ML in SC 4.0 as well as to understand the BDA and ML techniques most commonly used in the field, with a particular focus on nonparametric techniques. To this end, we carried out a literature review. From our analysis, we identified three main gaps, namely, the need for appropriate analytical tools to manage challenging data configurations; the need for a more reliable link with practice; the need for instruments to select the most suitable BDA or ML techniques. As a solution, we suggest and comment on two viable solutions: nonparametric statistics, and sentiment analysis and clustering.","PeriodicalId":93142,"journal":{"name":"Stats","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stats","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/stats6020038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Owing to the development of the technologies of Industry 4.0, recent years have witnessed the emergence of a new concept of supply chain management, namely Supply Chain 4.0 (SC 4.0). Huge investments in information technology have enabled manufacturers to trace the intangible flow of information, but instruments are required to take advantage of the available data sources: big data analytics (BDA) and machine learning (ML) represent important tools for this task. Use of advanced technologies can improve supply chain performances and support reaching strategic goals, but their implementation is challenging in supply chain management. The aim of this study was to understand the main benefits, challenges, and areas of application of BDA and ML in SC 4.0 as well as to understand the BDA and ML techniques most commonly used in the field, with a particular focus on nonparametric techniques. To this end, we carried out a literature review. From our analysis, we identified three main gaps, namely, the need for appropriate analytical tools to manage challenging data configurations; the need for a more reliable link with practice; the need for instruments to select the most suitable BDA or ML techniques. As a solution, we suggest and comment on two viable solutions: nonparametric statistics, and sentiment analysis and clustering.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链4.0中的大数据分析和机器学习:文献综述
由于工业4.0技术的发展,近年来出现了供应链管理的新概念,即供应链4.0 (SC 4.0)。对信息技术的巨大投资使制造商能够追踪无形的信息流,但需要工具来利用可用的数据源:大数据分析(BDA)和机器学习(ML)是完成这项任务的重要工具。先进技术的使用可以改善供应链绩效并支持实现战略目标,但它们的实施在供应链管理中具有挑战性。本研究的目的是了解SC 4.0中BDA和ML的主要优点、挑战和应用领域,以及了解该领域最常用的BDA和ML技术,特别关注非参数技术。为此,我们进行了文献综述。从我们的分析中,我们确定了三个主要差距,即需要适当的分析工具来管理具有挑战性的数据配置;需要与实践建立更可靠的联系;需要仪器来选择最合适的BDA或ML技术。作为解决方案,我们提出并评论了两个可行的解决方案:非参数统计,情感分析和聚类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating Risk Factors for Racial Disparity in E-Cigarette Use with PATH Study. Precise Tensor Product Smoothing via Spectral Splines Predicting Random Walks and a Data-Splitting Prediction Region The Mediating Impact of Innovation Types in the Relationship between Innovation Use Theory and Market Performance Jump-Robust Realized-GARCH-MIDAS-X Estimators for Bitcoin and Ethereum Volatility Indices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1