Physical Properties of Pulp and Paper: A Comparison of Forming Procedures

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY Forest Products Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.13073/fpj-d-23-00007
Yingju Miao, Siyu Xiang, Yingfen Wei, Xiaohui Long, J. Qiu, Yingchun Miao
{"title":"Physical Properties of Pulp and Paper: A Comparison of Forming Procedures","authors":"Yingju Miao, Siyu Xiang, Yingfen Wei, Xiaohui Long, J. Qiu, Yingchun Miao","doi":"10.13073/fpj-d-23-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this work, we used the conventional wet papermaking process and the solution casting procedure to make paper sheets and optimized the relative content of eucalyptus and Simao pine pulps using the mechanical properties of the paper sheet as the evaluation index. The chemical composition, water retention value, zeta potential, carboxyl content, and drainage behavior of the pulp created using the optimal mass ratio for each method were measured, and the resulting paper sheets were characterized via Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms. We found that for a ratio of eucalyptus to Simao pine pulps of 94:6 using the wet papermaking process, the mechanical properties of sheets took their optimal values, and the tear, tensile, and burst indexes and the folding endurance were equal to 4.43 mN·m2·g−1, 27.47 N·m·g−1, 1.13 kPa·m2·g−1, and 11.38 times, respectively, whereas the ratio leading to the best possible mechanical performance in the solution casting process was 88:12, and the corresponding paper sheets had tear, tensile, and burst indexes and the folding endurance of 11.73 mN·m2·g−1, 23.03 N·m·g−1, 0.68 kPa·m2·g−1, and 25.50 times, respectively. The cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents of the pulp treated by the solution casting method were lower by 1.88, 3.11, and 2.67 percent, respectively, compared to that obtained via the wet papermaking process. However, the water retention value, zeta potential, and carboxyl content of the pulp obtained via solution casting were higher by 50.31, 123.41, and 50.15, percent, respectively, compared to that obtained via the wet papermaking process. The drainage time obtained via the solution casting method was one-fifth of that obtained via the wet forming process. The paper sheet prepared via the solution casting method was found to exhibit weaker hydrogen bonding, a decreased level of crystallinity (26.64% lower), and an increased compactness and N2 gas adsorption capacity (19.55% and 66.7% higher, respectively) compared to the sheet obtained via the wet papermaking process. This work shows that the physical properties of the paper prepared via the two processes considered here, using their respective optimal weight ratios of the different types of pulp, have their own advantages.","PeriodicalId":12387,"journal":{"name":"Forest Products Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Products Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13073/fpj-d-23-00007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, we used the conventional wet papermaking process and the solution casting procedure to make paper sheets and optimized the relative content of eucalyptus and Simao pine pulps using the mechanical properties of the paper sheet as the evaluation index. The chemical composition, water retention value, zeta potential, carboxyl content, and drainage behavior of the pulp created using the optimal mass ratio for each method were measured, and the resulting paper sheets were characterized via Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms. We found that for a ratio of eucalyptus to Simao pine pulps of 94:6 using the wet papermaking process, the mechanical properties of sheets took their optimal values, and the tear, tensile, and burst indexes and the folding endurance were equal to 4.43 mN·m2·g−1, 27.47 N·m·g−1, 1.13 kPa·m2·g−1, and 11.38 times, respectively, whereas the ratio leading to the best possible mechanical performance in the solution casting process was 88:12, and the corresponding paper sheets had tear, tensile, and burst indexes and the folding endurance of 11.73 mN·m2·g−1, 23.03 N·m·g−1, 0.68 kPa·m2·g−1, and 25.50 times, respectively. The cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin contents of the pulp treated by the solution casting method were lower by 1.88, 3.11, and 2.67 percent, respectively, compared to that obtained via the wet papermaking process. However, the water retention value, zeta potential, and carboxyl content of the pulp obtained via solution casting were higher by 50.31, 123.41, and 50.15, percent, respectively, compared to that obtained via the wet papermaking process. The drainage time obtained via the solution casting method was one-fifth of that obtained via the wet forming process. The paper sheet prepared via the solution casting method was found to exhibit weaker hydrogen bonding, a decreased level of crystallinity (26.64% lower), and an increased compactness and N2 gas adsorption capacity (19.55% and 66.7% higher, respectively) compared to the sheet obtained via the wet papermaking process. This work shows that the physical properties of the paper prepared via the two processes considered here, using their respective optimal weight ratios of the different types of pulp, have their own advantages.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纸浆和纸张的物理性能:成型过程的比较
本文采用常规湿法造纸工艺和溶液浇铸工艺制备纸张,并以纸张的力学性能为评价指标,优化了桉树和思茅松纸浆的相对含量。测量了使用每种方法的最佳质量比产生的纸浆的化学组成、保水值、ζ电位、羧基含量和排水行为,并通过傅里叶变换红外光谱、X射线衍射、扫描电子显微镜和氮吸附/脱附等温线对所得纸张进行了表征。我们发现,当桉树与思茅松浆的比例为94:6时,采用湿法造纸工艺,片材的力学性能达到了最佳值,撕裂、拉伸、爆裂指数和耐折性分别为4.43mN·m2·g−1、27.47N·m·g−2、1.13kPa·m2·g-1和11.38倍,而在溶液浇铸过程中获得最佳机械性能的比率为88:12,相应的纸张的撕裂、拉伸和爆裂指数以及耐折性分别为11.73mN·m2·g−1、23.03N·m·g−2、0.68kPa·m2·g-1和25.50倍。与通过湿法造纸工艺获得的纸浆相比,通过溶液浇铸法处理的纸浆的纤维素、半纤维素和木质素含量分别降低1.88%、3.11和2.67%。然而,与通过湿法造纸工艺获得的纸浆相比,通过溶液浇铸获得的纸浆的保水值、ζ电位和羧基含量分别高出50.31%、123.41%和50.15%。通过溶液浇铸法获得的排水时间是通过湿法成型法获得的时间的五分之一。与通过湿法造纸工艺获得的纸张相比,发现通过溶液浇铸法制备的纸张表现出较弱的氢键、降低的结晶度(降低26.64%)以及增加的致密性和N2气体吸附能力(分别提高19.55%和66.7%)。这项工作表明,通过本文所考虑的两种工艺,使用不同类型纸浆各自的最佳重量比,制备的纸张的物理性能各有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Products Journal
Forest Products Journal 工程技术-材料科学:纸与木材
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Products Journal (FPJ) is the source of information for industry leaders, researchers, teachers, students, and everyone interested in today''s forest products industry. The Forest Products Journal is well respected for publishing high-quality peer-reviewed technical research findings at the applied or practical level that reflect the current state of wood science and technology. Articles suitable as Technical Notes are brief notes (generally 1,200 words or less) that describe new or improved equipment or techniques; report on findings produced as by-products of major studies; or outline progress to date on long-term projects.
期刊最新文献
Validating LORCAT, the Log Recovery Analysis Tool Chinese Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Certified Wood Products Design and Evaluation of a Shear Analogy Tool for Custom Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Panels Made from Various Wood Species Use and Future Development of Optical Measurement Technology in the Study of Wood Surface Roughness CiteSpace-Based Scientometric Analysis (2003 through 2022) Impact of Growth Characteristics on Properties of 2 by 8 Southern Yellow Pine Structural Lumber
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1