Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials protocol amendments

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Research Results in Pharmacology Pub Date : 2023-04-27 DOI:10.18413/rrpharmacology.9.10021
A. Eleskina, O. Filippova, Nathalia V. Pyatigorskaya
{"title":"Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials protocol amendments","authors":"A. Eleskina, O. Filippova, Nathalia V. Pyatigorskaya","doi":"10.18413/rrpharmacology.9.10021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic situation had a great impact on all spheres of people’s lives. It also affected clinical trials as Sponsors, sites and investigators faced a number of problems, such as systematic IMP taking, adherence to protocol visits, efficacy evaluations, laboratory procedures, and analyses.\nMaterials and Methods: The amendments issued in 2020 were compared with the amendments issued in the previous three years 2017-2019. The literature about COVID-19 and its impact on clinical trials were analyzed. Clinical trial protocol amendments published in 2020 were studied to evaluate pandemic influence on ongoing clinical studies. Statistical processing of the results was carried out using the correlation analysis.\nResults:  The highest quantity of amendments was released in 2020 –14 (36%). Fewer amendments came out in 2019 – 13 (33%), in 2018 – 9 (23%), and the fewest amendments were issued in 2017 – 3 (8%).\n Conclusion: The existing system of clinical trial protocol creation is dependable and adequate. It allows reacting flexibly to unexpected challenges, like COVID-19, fully complying with the prescribed procedures and carefully observing participants’ safety and well-being. That is why the current pandemic did not affect the number of protocol amendments.\nGraphical Abstract\n","PeriodicalId":21030,"journal":{"name":"Research Results in Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Results in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18413/rrpharmacology.9.10021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic situation had a great impact on all spheres of people’s lives. It also affected clinical trials as Sponsors, sites and investigators faced a number of problems, such as systematic IMP taking, adherence to protocol visits, efficacy evaluations, laboratory procedures, and analyses. Materials and Methods: The amendments issued in 2020 were compared with the amendments issued in the previous three years 2017-2019. The literature about COVID-19 and its impact on clinical trials were analyzed. Clinical trial protocol amendments published in 2020 were studied to evaluate pandemic influence on ongoing clinical studies. Statistical processing of the results was carried out using the correlation analysis. Results:  The highest quantity of amendments was released in 2020 –14 (36%). Fewer amendments came out in 2019 – 13 (33%), in 2018 – 9 (23%), and the fewest amendments were issued in 2017 – 3 (8%).  Conclusion: The existing system of clinical trial protocol creation is dependable and adequate. It allows reacting flexibly to unexpected challenges, like COVID-19, fully complying with the prescribed procedures and carefully observing participants’ safety and well-being. That is why the current pandemic did not affect the number of protocol amendments. Graphical Abstract
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎对临床试验方案修订的影响
简介:新冠肺炎疫情对人们生活的各个领域都产生了巨大影响。它还影响了临床试验,因为申办方、研究地点和研究人员面临着许多问题,如系统性IMP服用、方案访问的依从性、疗效评估、实验室程序和分析。材料和方法:将2020年发布的修正案与2017-2019年前三年发布的修订案进行了比较。分析了有关新冠肺炎的文献及其对临床试验的影响。研究了2020年发布的临床试验方案修正案,以评估疫情对正在进行的临床研究的影响。使用相关分析对结果进行统计处理。结果:2020-2014年发布的修正案数量最高(36%)。2019-13年(33%)、2018-9年(23%)发布的修正案较少,2017-3年(8%)发布的修订案最少。结论:现有的临床试验方案创建系统是可靠和充分的。它允许灵活应对意外挑战,如新冠肺炎,完全遵守规定的程序,并仔细观察参与者的安全和健康状况。这就是为什么当前的疫情没有影响议定书修正案的数量。图形摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Results in Pharmacology
Research Results in Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Исследование влияния полипренолов пихты сибирской на обучаемость и память мышей с экспериментальной моделью болезни Альцгеймера Chemoproteomic analysis of the promising candidate molecule of the indole derivative with lab code SV-1010 and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs An effective way for targeting EGFR-mediated carcinogenesis: an in vitro study Protective effects of thymogen analogues, modified by D-alanine, in hydrazine liver damage Assessment of VEGF and TNF-alpha levels in patients with an unexpectedly poor and suboptimal response during the treatment of infertility using ART methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1