When Asking “What” and “How” Helps You Win: Mimicry of Interrogative Terms Facilitates Successful Online Negotiations

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 MANAGEMENT Negotiation and Conflict Management Research Pub Date : 2020-05-26 DOI:10.1111/ncmr.12179
K. Muir, A. Joinson, Emily Collins, R. Cotterill, Nigel Dewdney
{"title":"When Asking “What” and “How” Helps You Win: Mimicry of Interrogative Terms Facilitates Successful Online Negotiations","authors":"K. Muir, A. Joinson, Emily Collins, R. Cotterill, Nigel Dewdney","doi":"10.1111/ncmr.12179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strategic word mimicry during negotiations facilitates better outcomes. We explore mimicry of specific word categories and perceptions of rapport, trust, and liking as underlying mechanisms. Dyads took part in an online negotiation exercise in which word mimicry was manipulated: Participants were instructed to mimic each other’s words (both-mimic), one participant mimicked the other (half-mimic), or neither participant mimicked (neither-mimic). When given a simple instruction to mimic their partner, participants mimicked both the style (personal pronouns, adverbs, linguistic style, interrogative terms) and the content (affiliation terms, power terms, and assents) of their partner’s messages. Mimicry was associated with greater joint and individual points gain and perceptions of rapport from the mimicked partner. Further, mimicry of inter-rogative terms (e.g., how, why) mediated positive effects of mimicry upon negotiation outcomes, suggesting the coordination of question asking between negotiators is an important strategy to create beneficial interactions and add value in negotiations.","PeriodicalId":45732,"journal":{"name":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/ncmr.12179","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Negotiation and Conflict Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Strategic word mimicry during negotiations facilitates better outcomes. We explore mimicry of specific word categories and perceptions of rapport, trust, and liking as underlying mechanisms. Dyads took part in an online negotiation exercise in which word mimicry was manipulated: Participants were instructed to mimic each other’s words (both-mimic), one participant mimicked the other (half-mimic), or neither participant mimicked (neither-mimic). When given a simple instruction to mimic their partner, participants mimicked both the style (personal pronouns, adverbs, linguistic style, interrogative terms) and the content (affiliation terms, power terms, and assents) of their partner’s messages. Mimicry was associated with greater joint and individual points gain and perceptions of rapport from the mimicked partner. Further, mimicry of inter-rogative terms (e.g., how, why) mediated positive effects of mimicry upon negotiation outcomes, suggesting the coordination of question asking between negotiators is an important strategy to create beneficial interactions and add value in negotiations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当询问“什么”和“如何”帮助你获胜时:模仿疑问词有助于成功的在线谈判
在谈判过程中,策略性的言语模仿有助于取得更好的结果。我们探索模仿特定的词类别和感知融洽,信任,和喜欢作为潜在的机制。二人组参加了一项在线谈判练习,其中操纵了单词模仿:参与者被指示模仿对方的单词(两个都模仿),一个参与者模仿另一个(半模仿),或者两个参与者都不模仿(两个都不模仿)。当给参与者一个简单的指令来模仿他们的伴侣时,参与者模仿他们伴侣信息的风格(人称代词、副词、语言风格、疑问句)和内容(从属术语、权力术语和同意)。模仿与更大的联合和个人得分以及从被模仿的伴侣那里获得的融洽感有关。此外,质疑术语的模仿(例如,如何、为什么)介导了模仿对谈判结果的积极影响,这表明谈判者之间的问题提问协调是在谈判中创造有益互动和增加价值的重要策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Value from Control: Subjective Valuations of Negotiations by Principals and Agents Why are Women Less Likely to Negotiate? The Influence of Expectancy Considerations and Contextual Framing on Gender Differences in the Initiation of Negotiation There is No Away: Where Do People Go When They Avoid an Interpersonal Conflict? Valuing Cooperation and Constructive Controversy: A Tribute to David W. Johnson Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1