Making the ‘invisible’ visible: transforming the detection of intimate partner violence

B. Khurana, S. Seltzer, I. Kohane, G. Boland
{"title":"Making the ‘invisible’ visible: transforming the detection of intimate partner violence","authors":"B. Khurana, S. Seltzer, I. Kohane, G. Boland","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 25 November 2018, the United Nations chillingly reported that the most dangerous place for women is inside their own homes. Each year more than half of female homicides are committed by current or former intimate partners or family members.1 Intimate partner violence (IPV), within the domestic violence spectrum, is defined as physical, sexual or emotional violence between partners or former partners.2 It is a serious public health concern with millions of people experiencing violence at the hands of an intimate partner. WHO recognizes IPV as a global issue, prevalent at epidemic proportions in every society, socioeconomic and educational group. According to the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, one in four women and one in nine men in USA have reported severe form of physical violence by an intimate partner during their lifetime.3 Despite the high prevalence and urgency of this critical public health issue, IPV continues to be profoundly underdiagnosed and is considered a persistent hidden epidemic. In addition to physical injuries, IPV has both short-term and long-term negative health consequences including asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, diabetes, poor reproductive health, chronic pain syndrome and mental health problems.4 With victims of IPV seeking medical care more often, healthcare providers can play a vital role in reducing the devastating impact of IPV by representing a trusting source of divulging abuse. The major obstacle to its early detection and intervention is victim under-reporting of physical violence to healthcare providers. Screening for IPV can be an effective tool for detecting and preventing future violence. However, several barriers limit the use and success of these screening programs. Due to shame, privacy, economic dependency, fear of retaliation, legal factors or lack of trust of providers, a patient may not self-report and even fabricate the history of her injury.5 …","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"29 1","pages":"241 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009905","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

On 25 November 2018, the United Nations chillingly reported that the most dangerous place for women is inside their own homes. Each year more than half of female homicides are committed by current or former intimate partners or family members.1 Intimate partner violence (IPV), within the domestic violence spectrum, is defined as physical, sexual or emotional violence between partners or former partners.2 It is a serious public health concern with millions of people experiencing violence at the hands of an intimate partner. WHO recognizes IPV as a global issue, prevalent at epidemic proportions in every society, socioeconomic and educational group. According to the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, one in four women and one in nine men in USA have reported severe form of physical violence by an intimate partner during their lifetime.3 Despite the high prevalence and urgency of this critical public health issue, IPV continues to be profoundly underdiagnosed and is considered a persistent hidden epidemic. In addition to physical injuries, IPV has both short-term and long-term negative health consequences including asthma, irritable bowel syndrome, diabetes, poor reproductive health, chronic pain syndrome and mental health problems.4 With victims of IPV seeking medical care more often, healthcare providers can play a vital role in reducing the devastating impact of IPV by representing a trusting source of divulging abuse. The major obstacle to its early detection and intervention is victim under-reporting of physical violence to healthcare providers. Screening for IPV can be an effective tool for detecting and preventing future violence. However, several barriers limit the use and success of these screening programs. Due to shame, privacy, economic dependency, fear of retaliation, legal factors or lack of trust of providers, a patient may not self-report and even fabricate the history of her injury.5 …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让“看不见的”可见:改变亲密伴侣暴力的检测
2018年11月25日,联合国发布了一份令人不寒而栗的报告,称女性最危险的地方是在自己的家中。每年有一半以上的女性凶杀案是由现任或前任亲密伴侣或家庭成员犯下的亲密伴侣暴力(IPV),在家庭暴力范围内,被定义为伴侣或前伴侣之间的身体、性或情感暴力数百万人遭受亲密伴侣的暴力,这是一个严重的公共卫生问题。世卫组织认识到,IPV是一个全球性问题,在每个社会、社会经济和教育群体中以流行病的形式普遍存在。根据全国亲密伴侣和性暴力调查,美国四分之一的女性和九分之一的男性报告在其一生中遭受过亲密伴侣的严重身体暴力尽管这一重大公共卫生问题的发病率很高,而且很紧迫,但IPV的诊断仍然严重不足,被认为是一种持续存在的隐性流行病。除了身体伤害外,IPV还会对健康造成短期和长期的负面影响,包括哮喘、肠易激综合征、糖尿病、生殖健康状况不佳、慢性疼痛综合征和精神健康问题随着IPV受害者更频繁地寻求医疗护理,医疗保健提供者可以作为泄露滥用行为的可信来源,在减少IPV的破坏性影响方面发挥至关重要的作用。早期发现和干预的主要障碍是受害者向医疗保健提供者少报身体暴力。IPV筛查可成为发现和预防未来暴力的有效工具。然而,一些障碍限制了这些筛查项目的使用和成功。由于羞耻感、隐私、经济依赖、害怕报复、法律因素或缺乏对提供者的信任,患者可能不会自我报告,甚至捏造自己的受伤史。5……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of telephone triage for predicting adverse outcomes in suspected COVID-19: an observational cohort study. Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. Addressing social determinants of health in primary care: a quasi-experimental study using unannounced standardised patients to evaluate the impact of audit/feedback on physicians' rates of identifying and responding to social needs. Reporting on implementation trials with null findings: the need for concurrent process evaluation reporting. Antibiotic documentation: death by a thousand clicks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1