Pharmacist-driven renal dose optimization practice—outcomes of a retrospective study in ambulatory care settings

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI:10.1093/jphsr/rmac020
Sainul Abideen Parakkal, Faisal Ahmed Hakeem, Hafees Madathil, H. S. Nemr, Fuad Hamed Ghamdi
{"title":"Pharmacist-driven renal dose optimization practice—outcomes of a retrospective study in ambulatory care settings","authors":"Sainul Abideen Parakkal, Faisal Ahmed Hakeem, Hafees Madathil, H. S. Nemr, Fuad Hamed Ghamdi","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmac020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Previous studies indicate a higher prevalence of inappropriate drug usage in patients with renal disease in ambulatory care settings and a higher rate of non-compliance with the renal dose adjustment protocol. This study aimed to investigate the number of renal dose adjustments recommended by pharmacists in ambulatory care settings, acceptance rate by the physicians and medications involved.\n \n \n \n This two-year retrospective study was conducted in an ambulatory care pharmacy in a Saudi Arabian tertiary care hospital. Based on the renal protocol at the study site, the pharmacists recommended dose adjustments for inappropriate medication orders, and the outcomes were documented electronically. A quantitative descriptive analysis of this practice was performed by retrieving the pharmacists’ documentation from electronic health records. Only protocol-compliant recommendations with proper documentation were included in the study.\n \n \n \n A total of 302 renal dose adjustments were recommended by pharmacists for 269 patients involving 47 medications, with an average of 1.12 recommendations per patient. The average monthly recommendation was 12.58 (median: 11; SD: 5.174; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 12 to 13.16). Of the 302 recommendations, 219 (72.52%) were accepted by the physician, and 71 (23.51%) were not. The most common medications accepted for renal dosage adjustment included levofloxacin (8.94%), metformin (5.29%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (5.29%), cetirizine (4.97%), diclofenac (4.64%), ciprofloxacin (3.97%) and nitrofurantoin (3.31%).\n \n \n \n The pharmacist’s renal dose recommendations have a high acceptance rate in ambulatory care. This study demonstrated that ambulatory care pharmacists play a substantial clinical role in reducing inappropriate drug use in patients with renal disease.\n","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmac020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies indicate a higher prevalence of inappropriate drug usage in patients with renal disease in ambulatory care settings and a higher rate of non-compliance with the renal dose adjustment protocol. This study aimed to investigate the number of renal dose adjustments recommended by pharmacists in ambulatory care settings, acceptance rate by the physicians and medications involved. This two-year retrospective study was conducted in an ambulatory care pharmacy in a Saudi Arabian tertiary care hospital. Based on the renal protocol at the study site, the pharmacists recommended dose adjustments for inappropriate medication orders, and the outcomes were documented electronically. A quantitative descriptive analysis of this practice was performed by retrieving the pharmacists’ documentation from electronic health records. Only protocol-compliant recommendations with proper documentation were included in the study. A total of 302 renal dose adjustments were recommended by pharmacists for 269 patients involving 47 medications, with an average of 1.12 recommendations per patient. The average monthly recommendation was 12.58 (median: 11; SD: 5.174; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 12 to 13.16). Of the 302 recommendations, 219 (72.52%) were accepted by the physician, and 71 (23.51%) were not. The most common medications accepted for renal dosage adjustment included levofloxacin (8.94%), metformin (5.29%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (5.29%), cetirizine (4.97%), diclofenac (4.64%), ciprofloxacin (3.97%) and nitrofurantoin (3.31%). The pharmacist’s renal dose recommendations have a high acceptance rate in ambulatory care. This study demonstrated that ambulatory care pharmacists play a substantial clinical role in reducing inappropriate drug use in patients with renal disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师驱动的肾脏剂量优化实践-门诊护理设置的回顾性研究结果
先前的研究表明,在门诊护理环境中,肾病患者不适当用药的发生率较高,不遵守肾脏剂量调整方案的比率较高。本研究旨在调查药剂师在门诊护理环境中建议的肾脏剂量调整次数、医生和相关药物的接受率。这项为期两年的回顾性研究是在沙特阿拉伯一家三级护理医院的门诊药房进行的。根据研究现场的肾脏方案,药剂师建议对不适当的医嘱进行剂量调整,并以电子方式记录结果。通过从电子健康记录中检索药剂师的文件,对这种做法进行了定量描述性分析。只有符合方案的建议和适当的文件才包括在研究中。药剂师为269名患者推荐了302次肾脏剂量调整,涉及47种药物,平均每位患者推荐1.12次。平均每月建议为12.58(中位数:11;标准差:5.174;95%置信区间(CI)为12至13.16)。在302条建议中,219条(72.52%)被医生接受,71条(23.51%)不被医生接受。接受的最常见的肾脏剂量调整药物包括左氧氟沙星(8.94%)、二甲双胍(5.29%)、阿莫西林-克拉维酸盐(52.9%)、西替利嗪(4.97%)、双氯芬酸(4.64%)、环丙沙星(3.97%)和呋喃妥因(3.31%)。药剂师的肾脏剂量建议在门诊护理中接受率很高。这项研究表明,门诊药剂师在减少肾病患者的不当药物使用方面发挥着重要的临床作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The revised patient attitudes to deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire: an investigation using a large anonymized database Evaluation of a structured pharmacist-led intervention on glycemic control in underprivileged diabetic patients: a randomized open-label trial Cross-sectional study of pharmacists’ knowledge and beliefs about human papillomavirus, its vaccines, and barriers related to vaccine administration Analysis of cancer drugs receiving FDA’s Accelerated Approval between 1992 and 2021 Navigating digital health: perspectives of Australian community pharmacists—a short communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1